Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the catastrophic fire at Hong Kong's Hong Fu Garden, highlighting the unique challenges of high-rise building fires and the need for improved fire safety regulations and practices globally [4][6][12]. Group 1: Fire Incident Analysis - Experts agree that the fire at Hong Fu Garden was unprecedented, with seven high-rise buildings igniting simultaneously, indicating a lack of preparedness among firefighters [5][7]. - The fire resulted in 128 fatalities and around 200 individuals unaccounted for, raising questions about the materials used in construction and the effectiveness of fire alarms [7][10]. - The fire's rapid spread was attributed to combustible materials like bamboo scaffolding and foam sealants, which facilitated vertical and horizontal fire propagation [9][10][12]. Group 2: Fire Safety Regulations - Historical fire incidents, such as the 1996 Hong Kong Gala Tower fire and the 2017 Grenfell Tower fire in London, have led to the establishment of new safety standards, emphasizing the need for continuous improvement in fire safety regulations [6][15]. - Current regulations in Hong Kong are stringent, yet the classification of bamboo scaffolding as a temporary structure creates loopholes in fire safety oversight [15][16]. - Experts suggest that integrating scaffolding regulations into building codes could enhance overall fire safety and prevent future tragedies [16][20]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - The article emphasizes the importance of proactive fire safety management, including early detection systems and regular maintenance of fire safety equipment [20][21]. - It is suggested that the government should phase out bamboo scaffolding in favor of safer alternatives to mitigate fire risks [16][20]. - The need for a collaborative approach among property owners, tenants, management companies, and contractors is highlighted to ensure effective implementation of fire safety measures [19][20].

Core Viewpoint - The tragic fire at Hong Kong's Hong Fu Court serves as a severe warning for the mainland real estate market, highlighting potential common issues and risks associated with aging high-rise buildings [1][11]. Group 1: Fire Incident and Causes - The fire was exacerbated by the use of polyurethane foam, which acted as a rapid fire spreader, indicating significant safety vulnerabilities in older high-rise buildings [1][10]. - Many residents reported that their windows were glued shut with foam, creating a major safety hazard during the fire [4]. Group 2: Aging High-Rise Issues - A large number of high-rise residential buildings in mainland China, constructed between the 1990s and 2010s, are now facing similar aging issues, including deteriorating exterior insulation, waterproofing failures, and structural problems [3][6]. - The reliance on inexpensive and quick fixes, such as foam, instead of comprehensive repairs, reflects a broader trend of prioritizing cost over safety in building maintenance [3][6]. Group 3: Material Concerns - The use of foam boards, particularly EPS (expanded polystyrene), in exterior insulation poses significant fire risks, especially when exposed to flames during renovations or maintenance [10]. - Although rock wool boards, introduced as a safer alternative, have been adopted since 2017, compliance with safety standards remains questionable, and many buildings still utilize older materials [7][8]. Group 4: Systemic Issues in Property Management - Property management often opts for superficial repairs rather than thorough maintenance, leading to a reliance on foam as a temporary solution for persistent issues [6]. - The misallocation of maintenance funds and the lack of financial resources hinder the ability to address the systemic problems associated with aging high-rises [6][11]. Group 5: Future Implications - The ongoing safety issues in aging high-rise buildings will persist unless addressed, with the Hong Fu Court incident potentially being just the beginning of a larger trend if no action is taken [11].

2025.11. 27 群组中有人发帖称自己在去年就向劳工处反应过消防隐患问题，得到答复是"根据现时劳工处所执行 适用于建筑地盘的安全条例中，并没有涵盖关于棚网或任何物料的阻燃标准。此外，根据本处人员对 该地盘视察所得，该维修工程并不需要在竹棚架上进行热工序、使用明火或易燃物品等等，而地盘内 亦有提供合适的灭火设施。因此，棚网发生火灾的风险相对为低。而本处亦已经提醒有关的承建商， 必须做好地盘内的防火措施以防止火灾发生。本处会继续密切监察上述工作地点的安全情况，以确保 工人的工作安全及健康。" 火灾发生后，外墙保护网的阻燃问题的话题在社群被广泛讨论。社区群组图片显示，维修所用密目式 安全立网由山东某化纤绳网有限公司提供，由滨州市检验检测中心出具检验报告。 第一财经联系该绳网公司，对方称并不认识工程承建商宏业建筑工程有限公司。 根据宏福苑业主立案法团信息，宏业建筑工程有限公司通告，会为施工外墙进行保护措施，包括使用 发泡胶完整将单位外墙玻璃遮盖，会在棚架之工作台加设帆布于棚网位置及铺设平台木板等。 本文字数：1326，阅读时长大约2分钟 作者 | 第一财经 蔡真 香港警方和消防部门27日凌晨召开记者会宣布，大埔 ...

保安局局长称，针对起火大厦外墙保护网等不寻常情况，会循刑事方向调查。 香港警方和消防部门27日凌晨召开记者会宣布，大埔屋邨宏福苑火灾目前已造成44人遇难，45人受伤。警方已拘捕3名涉嫌误杀 的男子。香港警方展开调查，发现建筑物外墙有保护网、防水帆布、塑料布，疑未符合防火标准，另有一座未波及的大厦每层电 梯大堂窗外都有发泡胶包封，易燃且可能加速火势蔓延，不排除发泡胶是迅速蔓延的原因。第一财经联系到该外墙保护网的生产 厂家，对方称并不认识该工程承建商。 警方发现一工程公司负责安装上述相关材料，相信该工程公司负责人严重疏忽，导致火势迅速蔓延，造成重大伤亡。警方拘捕的 3人为工程公司负责人，包括2名董事、1名工程顾问，年龄介于52岁至68岁。 起火的住宅是宏福苑，香港中原地产官网显示，宏福苑楼龄已有42年，位于大埔市中心大埔公路元洲仔3821号，共有8座。 根据香港政府强制验楼计划，楼龄达30年或以上的私人楼宇（不超过3层高的住用楼宇除外）的业主，须在接获屋宇署送达法定 通知后，委任一名注册检验人员就楼宇的公用部分、外牆及伸出物或招牌进行订明检验并监督检验后认为需要进行的订明修葺工 程。如须进行订明修葺，有关业主须委 ...