Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of transforming scientific and technological achievements from universities into practical productivity to foster new quality productivity [6][7] - The establishment of regional technology transfer centers aims to facilitate the conversion of academic innovations into market-ready products [7][10] - Various regions are implementing separate management systems for job-related scientific achievements, granting universities and research institutions more autonomy in managing their technological assets [10][12] Group 2 - A significant barrier to technology transfer is the complex asset management procedures and unclear ownership rights, which discourage researchers from pursuing commercialization [8][9] - The need for a robust incentive mechanism for researchers is highlighted, suggesting that technology transfer should be integrated into performance evaluations and promotions [11][12] - There is a mismatch between the outputs of academic research and the needs of enterprises, indicating a need for better alignment between research and market demands [12][13] Group 3 - The establishment of pilot programs to clarify intellectual property rights has shown promise in attracting significant investment for technology commercialization [9][10] - The lack of mid-stage testing platforms hinders the transition from laboratory research to market-ready products, necessitating increased support for these facilities [15][16] - Government initiatives are underway to promote the development of mid-stage testing service platforms, with specific targets set for the number of platforms by 2028 [17] Group 4 - The shortage of specialized talent in technology transfer is a critical issue, with calls for the development of a professional workforce capable of bridging the gap between research and industry [19][20] - Collaborative efforts between universities and external technology transfer platforms are essential for enhancing the effectiveness of technology commercialization [22][23] - Recommendations include establishing clear career paths and compensation structures for technology transfer professionals to attract and retain talent in this field [22][23]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of transforming scientific and technological achievements from universities into real productivity, highlighting the role of higher education institutions in driving industrial innovation [7][8] - It discusses the establishment of regional technology transfer centers, such as the one in Jiangsu, to facilitate the conversion of academic research into practical applications [8][9] - The article identifies key challenges in technology transfer, including complex asset management procedures and unclear ownership rights, which discourage researchers from pursuing commercialization [9][11] Group 2 - The need for a clear incentive mechanism for researchers is highlighted, suggesting that performance evaluations should include technology transfer achievements to motivate participation [12][14] - The article points out a mismatch between academic outputs and market needs, indicating that many patents lack commercial viability due to insufficient market research [13][14] - Experts recommend strengthening the role of enterprises in innovation and creating collaborative networks between academia and industry to better align research with market demands [15] Group 3 - The article discusses the critical phase of pilot testing in technology transfer, noting that many innovations fail to progress due to a lack of funding and support during this stage [17][18] - It mentions the establishment of pilot service platforms by local governments to enhance the efficiency of technology transfer and support the commercialization of research [18][20] - The importance of application scenarios for research outcomes is emphasized, with examples of successful collaborations between universities and local businesses to find suitable markets for new technologies [19][20] Group 4 - The article highlights the shortage of specialized personnel in technology transfer, which limits the effective commercialization of research [20][21] - It suggests the need for professional training programs to develop a skilled workforce capable of bridging the gap between research and industry [23][24] - Recommendations include creating clear career paths and compensation structures for technology transfer professionals to attract talent to this field [24]