Core Viewpoint - The case involves a significant fraud scheme where a former school principal, Tong Min, deceived 29 individuals into investing over 50 million yuan, with a substantial portion of the funds misappropriated for online gaming expenditures [1][2]. Group 1: Case Background - The trial on July 8 involved 29 plaintiffs suing Tong Min's father, Tong Mou Rong, and companies including Tencent's payment arm and NetEase for the return of funds lost to fraud [1]. - Tong Min, who previously served as a principal, misled investors about various educational projects to secure investments, which were later found to be used for gaming [1]. Group 2: Financial Details - The total amount involved in the fraud exceeded 50 million yuan, with over 30 million yuan specifically identified as being used for in-game purchases in the game "Datang Wushuang" [2]. - Between August 2017 and May 2021, Tong Min reportedly recharged over 7 million yuan through 11 real-name accounts with NetEase [2]. - An audit revealed that from August 2015 to May 2021, Tong Min transferred a net amount of approximately 25.78 million yuan to game agents, all of which was used for gaming recharges [2]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - During the second trial, the plaintiffs withdrew their claims against Tencent's payment company, focusing instead on recovering funds from NetEase [1]. - The defense from NetEase claimed discrepancies in the amounts involved, leading the plaintiffs' lawyers to suggest potential money laundering activities and request a halt to proceedings for further investigation [2].

Core Points - The case involves a former school principal, Tong Min, who allegedly defrauded nearly 50 million yuan, primarily through online gaming [1][2] - Following her suicide in May 2021, the police closed the case, but 29 victims have since filed a lawsuit against her father and two companies [1][2] - The majority of the defrauded funds, approximately 30 million yuan, were reportedly used for in-game purchases in the online game "Datang Wushuang" [1][2] Summary by Sections Legal Proceedings - The second trial for the case began on July 8, 2023, at the Sichuan Luzhou Intermediate People's Court, with a full courtroom present [1] - The victims, mostly friends and family of Tong Min, are seeking justice after the police's initial closure of the case [2] Financial Details - Allegations state that Tong Min's fraudulent activities involved over 50 million yuan, with 30 million yuan specifically linked to gaming expenditures [1][2] - From August 2017 to May 2021, she reportedly recharged over 7 million yuan to the gaming company, which has led to claims of potential money laundering [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a high-profile court case involving 29 plaintiffs who allege that Tong Min, the deceased daughter of Tong Mou Rong, defrauded them of over 50 million yuan through investment scams related to educational projects and misappropriated funds for online gaming [3][4]. Group 1: Case Background - The first-instance court dismissed the claims of the 29 plaintiffs, leading them to appeal the decision [3]. - Tong Min, who was a principal of a well-known private school in Luzhou, deceived her family and friends into investing in non-existent projects, resulting in significant financial losses for the victims [3][4]. - After being implicated in a contract fraud case, Tong Min committed suicide in May 2021, leading to the case being closed [3]. Group 2: Financial Details - The total amount involved in the case exceeds 50 million yuan, with over 30 million yuan specifically identified as being used for in-game purchases in the online game "Datang Wushuang" [4][6]. - From August 2017 to May 2021, Tong Min reportedly recharged over 7 million yuan through 11 real-name accounts with the gaming company [5]. - An audit revealed that between August 2015 and May 2021, Tong Min transferred a net amount of approximately 25.78 million yuan to game agents, all of which was used for game recharges [6]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - During the second-instance trial, the plaintiffs withdrew their claims against the payment technology company, focusing instead on recovering funds from the gaming company [4]. - The defense attorney for the gaming company claimed discrepancies in the financial amounts presented, prompting the plaintiffs' attorney to suggest potential money laundering activities and request a suspension of the trial for further investigation [7].