宜通世纪（SZ300310）斥资10亿元跨界并购过来的标的，如今走到了破产终结的结局，而宜通世纪仅获得83万元的破产财产分配。 2月2日晚间，宜通世纪发布公告称，其曾经的全资子公司深圳市倍泰健康测量分析技术有限公司（以下简称"倍泰健康"）破产程序终结。 这起曾被寄予厚望、旨在跨界智慧医疗的收购，最终演变为一场"噩梦"。从2018年倍泰健康"爆雷"开始，宜通世纪不仅要因其业绩崩盘计提巨额商誉减 值，还惹了一身的麻烦。 不过，虽然倍泰健康的破产程序在法律上终结，但这起天价并购案留下的"后遗症"尚未完全平息。2025年11月，宜通世纪透露，公司因股权转让合同纠纷 起诉倍泰健康原股东一案，被发回重审。 倍泰健康破产程序终结 公司仅获83万元分配款 宜通世纪最新公告显示，公司近日收到广东省深圳市中级人民法院出具的《民事裁定书》，其债务人倍泰健康被法院裁定终结破产程序。 公告显示，倍泰健康的破产清算申请于2023年11月13日被法院受理，倍泰健康于2026年1月26日被法院裁定宣告破产。 据倍泰健康的《破产财产分配方案》，宜通世纪作为债权人，可获得分配的破产财产金额约83万元。宜通世纪在公告中表示，该事项预计将对公司利润 ...

本文来自微信公众号"大象新闻" 2026年1月15日清晨，河北霸州一处坟前，张坤宇和家人捧着一份刑事判决书，轻轻放在墓碑前。"被告 人张宝财无罪"八个字，终于告慰了这位病逝狱中14年的老人。此时，距离张宝财被判刑已近20年。 商机变迷局：老企业家卷入诈骗漩涡 1942年生于河北霸州南孟镇南孟村的张宝财，是当地小有名气的五金商人。1990年代末，他揣着积蓄赴 京拓业，想扩大经营规模、转变发展模式。张宝财注册了一家公司：北京中资创业经贸有限公司（以下 简称中资创业公司），之后还通过北京市西城区一家正规"信息部"花3000元买下商机。 顺着信息，张宝财认识了自称澳大利亚天圣国际商贸财团有限公司（以下简称天圣财团）中国项目工作 部的负责人孙双（孙玉飞）。之后，孙双称天圣财团于2001年与加拿大慰诺（华营进出口集团）总公司 签订了一份工程总量为660万套、价值85800万美元的隔离栅栏供货合同。2026年1月30日，张宝财孙子 张坤宇表示："爷爷以名下中资创业公司的名义与孙双签订合同，承接了220万套隔离栅栏项目。" 之后，张宝财按孙双要求对外发包业务给生产商。"孙双通过我爷爷招收了包括柳某池等在内的3个生产 商，生产 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case involves Zhang and He, who fraudulently claimed to have the ability to process housing indicators for affordable housing in Sanya, defrauding over a hundred victims of more than 13 million yuan in total [1][3]. Group 1: Fraud Scheme Details - Zhang and He collected fees ranging from 60,000 to 400,000 yuan from potential homebuyers under the pretense of securing affordable housing indicators [1]. - They forged contracts and receipts related to the Sanya affordable housing program, misleading victims into believing they were legitimate [1][2]. - The fraud occurred between the second half of 2019 and January 2023, exploiting victims' desire for low-cost housing [1]. Group 2: Legal Consequences - Zhang was sentenced to 11 years and 10 months in prison, along with a fine of 200,000 yuan, while He received a 6-year sentence and a fine of 50,000 yuan for their roles in the fraud [1][3]. - The court found that Zhang defrauded victims of 10.6384 million yuan, while He was involved in defrauding 2.54 million yuan, classifying their actions as particularly egregious [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Financial Regulatory Administration and the Ministry of Public Security have intensified collaboration to combat illegal financial activities, particularly in the "black and gray" sectors, achieving positive results through the publication of typical cases [1][18]. Group 1: Case Summaries - **Case 1**: An investment company and its members engaged in illegal lending under the guise of "buying houses on behalf of others," lending a total of 56.39 million yuan at an actual annual interest rate exceeding 36% from 2022 to 2023 [1][19][20]. - **Case 2**: A perpetrator fabricated business materials to defraud six financial institutions, obtaining over 102 million yuan in unsecured operating loans, with 57 million yuan in overdue principal at the time of investigation [4][22][24]. - **Case 3**: A group recruited individuals without genuine purchasing ability to apply for auto loans, resulting in a total loan amount of 7.344 million yuan, with a bank loss of 6.765 million yuan [8][25][27]. - **Case 4**: A fraud ring misled insurance clients into short-term cancellations of policies, leading to a total investment of over 17.63 million yuan and a loss of 5.84 million yuan for the insurance company [11][29][31]. - **Case 5**: Individuals illegally purchased personal information of insurance policyholders, leading to a profit of 68,749 yuan from the illegal sale of 67,207 personal records [14][32][35]. Group 2: Enforcement Actions - The police initiated investigations into these cases, with significant penalties imposed, including prison sentences ranging from two to over twelve years for various defendants involved in these financial crimes [2][6][19][23][30]. - The judicial outcomes reflect a commitment to severe punishment for financial crimes, reinforcing the legal framework against such activities and ensuring the protection of the financial ecosystem [7][24][28][31]. Group 3: Implications and Recommendations - The crackdown on illegal intermediaries is crucial for the effective implementation of macroeconomic policies, particularly in supporting small and micro enterprises [3][20]. - Strengthening collaboration between financial regulatory bodies and law enforcement is essential for comprehensive risk management and prevention of financial crimes [7][24][35]. - Continuous education and awareness campaigns are recommended to inform consumers about their rights and the risks associated with financial products, thereby enhancing the integrity of the financial market [16][35].

Core Viewpoint - Tian Di Online (002995.SZ) experienced a decline of 3.78%, closing at 19.34 yuan, with a market capitalization of less than 3.5 billion yuan due to a contract fraud incident involving its subsidiary [1] Group 1: Company Developments - The company announced that its subsidiary, Quan Shi Share, signed three promotional service cooperation contracts to provide marketing planning and execution services [1] - During the execution of these contracts, it was discovered that a project liaison from the client, Xie Sifan, was suspected of contract fraud involving an amount of 55.0853 million yuan [1] - Quan Shi Share has reported the case to the authorities, and the case has been accepted for investigation [1] Group 2: Financial Impact - The company has managed to recover 15.8693 million yuan of the defrauded amount [1] - The progress and outcome of the case remain uncertain, which may impact the company's financial standing [1]

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The company has reported a case of contract fraud involving a total amount of 55.0853 million yuan, which has been reported to the police and is currently under investigation [1]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The company's subsidiary, Beijing Quanshi Sharing Technology Co., Ltd., signed three promotional service cooperation contracts in July and August 2025 [1]. - During the execution of these marketing services, the company discovered that a project liaison from the client, Xie Saifan, and his accomplices were suspected of fraud [1]. - The company has filed a report with the Chaoyang Branch of the Beijing Public Security Bureau, and the case has been accepted with a registration number [1]. Group 2: Management Response - The management has established a special task force to investigate the incident, manage aftermath, and control risks, successfully recovering 15.8693 million yuan so far [2]. - The company plans to enhance internal control management, focusing on partner qualification reviews, contract approvals, performance supervision, and payment approval processes to identify and rectify potential risks [2]. - The company will cooperate with the police investigation and take measures to recover losses while ensuring compliance with legal disclosure obligations [2].

Core Viewpoint - The announcement reveals that Tian Di Online's subsidiary, Quan Shi Sharing, has signed three promotional service cooperation contracts with clients, but has encountered a case of suspected contract fraud involving a project liaison and accomplices, amounting to 55.0853 million yuan [1] Group 1 - Tian Di Online's subsidiary, Quan Shi Sharing, signed three contracts for marketing planning and execution services scheduled for July and August 2025 [1] - The fraud case involves a project liaison named Xie Saifan and associates, with a total suspected fraud amount of 55.0853 million yuan [1]

Core Viewpoint - Tian Di Online (002995) reported an incident involving its subsidiary, Beijing Quanshi Sharing Technology Co., which discovered a contract fraud case amounting to 55.0853 million yuan [1] Group 1: Incident Details - The subsidiary signed three promotional service cooperation contracts in July and August 2025 [1] - The fraud was perpetrated by project liaison personnel, Xie Saifan, and accomplices [1] - The company has reported the case to the Chaoyang District Public Security Bureau in Beijing, which has accepted the case [1] Group 2: Financial Impact and Response - The company stated that this incident is an isolated occurrence and will not significantly impact normal operations [1] - A special task force has been established to investigate the incident, manage aftermath, and control risks [1] - The company has recovered 15.8693 million yuan of the defrauded amount [1] Group 3: Future Measures - The company plans to enhance internal control management and conduct thorough risk assessments regarding partner qualifications, contract approvals, and payment processes [1] - There will be a focus on strengthening internal controls, improving process execution supervision, and raising overall risk awareness among employees [1]

Core Viewpoint - Tian Di Online (002995.SZ) announced that its subsidiary, Quan Shi Share, signed three promotional service cooperation contracts with clients, but discovered a contract fraud involving an amount of 55.0853 million yuan [1] Group 1: Contract and Fraud Details - Quan Shi Share is contracted to provide marketing planning and execution services [1] - The fraud was allegedly committed by project liaison personnel, Xie Saifan, and accomplices [1] - The involved amount in the fraud is reported to be 55.0853 million yuan [1] Group 2: Legal and Recovery Actions - Quan Shi Share has reported the case to the Chaoyang Branch of Beijing Public Security Bureau and received a case acceptance receipt on January 14, 2026 [1] - The company has established a special task force to investigate the incident, manage aftermath, and control risks [1] - As of now, the company has recovered 15.8693 million yuan [1]

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the issue of contract fraud in the liquor distribution industry, emphasizing the need for better regulatory practices and risk management in transactions involving large sums of money [2][3]. Group 1: Case Summary - A liquor dealer, Mao, lost over 1.49 million yuan due to fraudulent transactions with Wang, who promised to supply liquor but failed to deliver [2]. - Wang was sentenced to eight years in prison and fined 50,000 yuan for contract fraud after it was revealed he used the funds for gambling [2][3]. - The investigation revealed Wang's financial instability and his intent to illegally possess the funds, supported by evidence of his gambling activities in Macau [3]. Group 2: Industry Implications - The case exposed vulnerabilities in the liquor purchasing industry, particularly the reliance on verbal agreements and lack of financial safeguards [3][4]. - Following the case, the local prosecutor's office initiated a series of legal awareness campaigns to educate merchants about the risks of oral contracts and the importance of third-party fund management [4]. - Positive changes have been observed in the local liquor market, with merchants now verifying counterparties' qualifications and adopting third-party fund management practices before large transactions [4].