Group 1 - The Supreme People's Procuratorate released 10 typical cases of ecological environment prosecution, highlighting the focus, difficulties, and key points in judicial protection of the ecological environment [1] - In a notable case, 24 individuals and 8 companies were involved in illegally discharging 23,125 tons of hazardous waste into the Yangtze River, causing ecological damage valued at over 106 million yuan [1] - The procuratorial authority in Wuhu City implemented a comprehensive accountability system, holding all parties responsible for the illegal waste discharge, including criminal and civil public interest lawsuits [1] Group 2 - In another case, two management personnel from a key polluting enterprise in Chongqing were sentenced for interfering with automatic monitoring data collection, which occurred 1,560 times over more than 20,000 minutes [2] - The Hubei Province's Xianing City Procuratorate initiated administrative public interest litigation to address various ecological issues in the Axe Head Lake area, promoting inter-departmental collaboration for long-term governance [2] - The Zhejiang Province's Huzhou City South Xun District Procuratorate utilized big data legal supervision models to identify widespread issues in industries like furniture manufacturing and textile dyeing, pushing for regulatory compliance and technological upgrades [2] Group 3 - Judicial authorities are exploring ways to restore damaged ecological resources while handling cases, as seen in Hunan Province where over 260 acres of illegally damaged forest land were addressed through administrative public interest litigation [3] - The procuratorial body issued recommendations to forestry departments to ensure compliance and effective ecological restoration, leading to the development of replanting and greening plans [3]

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Procuratorate disclosed cases of companies illegally discharging hazardous waste into the Yangtze River, resulting in over 100 million yuan in ecological damage [1] - From 2018 to March 2023, 24 individuals and 8 companies, including Anhui Certain Technology Co., were involved in the illegal discharge of 23,125 tons of hazardous waste into the Yangtze River [1] - The ecological damage caused by these actions was assessed at over 106 million yuan [1] Group 2 - The court proceedings initiated by the Wuhu City Procuratorate included civil public interest lawsuits against the involved parties, seeking a total of over 116.97 million yuan in ecological restoration and punitive damages [2] - Anhui Certain Technology Co. proposed a technical modification to offset part of the ecological damage compensation, with a maximum offset amount confirmed at 30.13 million yuan, which is 34% of the total compensation [2] - The remaining compensation will be paid in installments over three years [2] Group 3 - The Wuhu City Court sentenced the defendants, including Huang and others, to prison terms ranging from 1 year and 2 months to 6 years and 6 months, along with fines ranging from 10,000 to 300,000 yuan [3] - Anhui Certain Technology Co. and other defendants were fined between 20,000 and 600,000 yuan for environmental pollution [3] - A total of 674,000 yuan in damage compensation agreements were reached with five companies and five individuals, which have been fully executed [3]