在硬件设施方面，公司实力雄厚，自有及租赁车辆 300 辆，涵盖大中小型全封闭、半封闭厢式货车、仓栅车、半挂车、高栏车、特种吊装作业车等多种车 型，货物运输可直达全国各地，并与全国各大城市中转站建立了稳定合作关系，为货物安全准时送达提供坚实保障；在仓储服务上，公司在昆明市区周边布 局多个仓储基地，提供包装、分拣、中转、装卸、运输等一站式服务，且采用现代化管理模式，确保仓储效率与安全。 日前，全国第 40 批 A 级物流企业名单正式公布，云南保龙国际物流有限公司凭借在硬件设施、信息化水平、人员素质、服务质量、管理体系等维度的综合 实力，顺利通过《物流企业分类与评估指标》（GB/T 19680-2013）国家标准审核，成功入选榜单，获评国家 3A 级物流企业称号。 据了解，云南保龙国际物流有限公司成立于 2014 年 6 月，注册资金达人民币伍仟万元整，经过十余年深耕发展，已成长为一家业务多元、服务完善的综合 性物流企业。公司主营业务涵盖成品烟叶仓储保管、装卸、运输、劳务派遣等核心板块，同时拓展了道路货物运输（不含危险货物）、食品销售等许可项 目，以及国际国内货物运输代理、报关报检、普通货物仓储、包装服务、物资销售 ...

Core Viewpoint - The logistics trust crisis in the cross-border e-commerce sector has been highlighted by the sudden disappearance of Shenzhen-based Tianhui Supply Chain, affecting numerous companies and revealing systemic risks in the industry [3][9][34]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Tianhui Supply Chain, a logistics service provider, suddenly went missing in August 2024, leaving several million yuan in prepayments unaccounted for and multiple shipments to the U.S. without updates [1][2][6]. - The company had been a reliable partner for many businesses in the cross-border e-commerce logistics sector, but its abrupt disappearance has led to significant financial losses for over 46 companies, with debts exceeding 1.6 billion yuan [7][33]. - The incident has triggered a broader discussion about the lack of regulatory oversight and the prevalence of low-cost, high-risk business practices in the logistics industry [4][9]. Group 2: Industry Context - The cross-border e-commerce sector in China has seen explosive growth, with the total import and export volume reaching 2.63 trillion yuan in 2024, more than doubling since 2018 [11]. - However, the rapid expansion has led to a significant increase in the number of logistics companies, resulting in a competitive environment characterized by low pricing strategies that can jeopardize financial stability [14][16]. - In 2023, 44,600 logistics companies were deregistered, marking a 10.4% increase from 2022, indicating a trend of industry consolidation and heightened operational risks [14][16]. Group 3: Fraud Mechanism - Tianhui employed a "killing pig" scam strategy, initially attracting clients with significantly lower prices than the market average, then creating a façade of reliability through successful small shipments [22][24]. - The company collected advance payments while delaying payments to upstream service providers, creating a cash flow pool that ultimately collapsed when it ceased operations [25][28]. - The lack of clear contractual obligations and the mixing of funds across various accounts complicated the legal recourse for affected companies, making it difficult to trace and recover lost funds [26][50]. Group 4: Legal and Regulatory Challenges - The legal framework surrounding the logistics industry is weak, with many contracts lacking clear compensation standards, making it challenging for victims to assert their rights [44][50]. - Despite being legally registered, Tianhui's status as a "surviving" company complicates efforts to freeze assets or initiate legal actions, as many companies struggle to provide the necessary evidence for claims [46][49]. - The incident underscores the urgent need for improved compliance and regulatory measures within the logistics sector to protect businesses from similar fraudulent activities in the future [55][56].