当前，人工智能(AI)技术驱动的新产业（300832）形态和经营模式不断涌现，AI技术的独特性能以及对 民事主体权利的影响，需要高度重视。6月12日，最高人民法院发布利用网络、信息技术侵害人格权典 型案例，其中有两起案例涉及利用AI技术侵权的问题。 未经许可利用AI处理使用他人声音，应承担人格权侵权责任 在"殷某某诉甲公司、乙公司等人格权纠纷案"中，殷某某曾为甲公司录制录音制品。甲公司将该录音制 品的音频提供给乙公司使用。乙公司以该音频为素材进行AI处理后形成软件产品，该产品使任意文字 内容都能以殷某某的声音展现出来。乙公司对外出售该产品。丙公司购买该软件产品后，又包装成自有 软件产品提供给用户使用。殷某某发现，一些短视频平台用户发布的视频中使用的是基于自己声音制作 的配音。经查，上述视频中的配音来源于丙公司的软件产品。殷某某并未授权上述任何公司将自己的声 音或音频作AI处理。随后，殷某某诉至法院，请求判令乙公司、丙公司立即停止侵权、赔礼道歉，以 上三个公司连带赔偿损失共计60万元。 审理法院认为，殷某某声音权益及于涉案AI声音。自然人声音具有独特性、唯一性、稳定性，能够给 他人形成或引起一般人产生与该自然人 ...

Group 1 - A software operating company developed and operated a "face-swapping" software using AI technology without authorization, leading to a court ruling that the company infringed on portrait rights and was ordered to apologize and compensate 3,000 yuan [1][2] - The case highlights the legal protection of natural persons' portrait rights, stating that unauthorized use of someone's image for commercial purposes constitutes an infringement [1][2] - The court's decision emphasizes that the company must bear civil liability for using another person's portrait for profit without consent, reinforcing the need for compliance with laws regarding personal rights [2] Group 2 - The Supreme Court noted the rapid development of information technology and AI, which brings both opportunities and challenges, including the risk of unregulated technological advancement [2] - The increasing prevalence of such software could expand the scope and degree of personal portrait rights violations, necessitating vigilance in the development and application of AI technologies [2] - The ruling serves as a reminder for stakeholders in the AI industry to adhere to legal regulations and respect personal rights when developing and applying new technologies [2]

Core Viewpoint - The rapid development of new technologies, particularly AI, necessitates a robust legal framework to protect individual rights and ensure the responsible use of these technologies in society [1][2][4]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Protection of Rights - The implementation of the Civil Code and Criminal Law Amendment (Nine) addresses the need for a comprehensive system to protect personal rights, including privacy and reputation [1][2]. - The courts are actively applying legal provisions to strengthen the protection of personality rights in cases involving the infringement of rights through the use of network and information technology [1][3]. Group 2: Case Summaries and Implications - Case 1 highlights that unauthorized publication of bounty advertisements for criminal information can constitute defamation, emphasizing the need for legitimate purposes in such advertisements [5][6]. - Case 2 demonstrates that unauthorized AI processing of an individual's voice constitutes an infringement of personality rights, reinforcing the legal protection of voice as a personal right [9][10][11]. - Case 3 illustrates that using someone's likeness for "face-swapping" without consent is a violation of portrait rights, stressing the importance of consent in the use of personal images [12][13][14]. - Case 4 shows that inciting online harassment through social media can infringe on an individual's reputation, highlighting the responsibility of account holders to manage their accounts legally [15][16][17]. - Case 5 indicates that the illegal sale of personal facial information can lead to criminal charges, underlining the legal consequences of violating personal information rights [18][20][21]. - Case 6 reveals that illegally controlling home surveillance systems constitutes a serious violation of privacy and information security, emphasizing the need for stringent legal measures against such actions [22][23][24].