Core Points - The case involves a minor, Xiao Tong, who made excessive purchases from a store operated by A Wei, a member of a fan support team for a celebrity, totaling over 60,000 yuan [1] - The court ruled that the contract between Xiao Tong and A Wei was invalid due to Xiao Tong's status as a minor and the lack of consent from her legal guardian [1] - The ruling highlights the responsibility of guardians to monitor minors' online activities and the obligation of service providers to protect minors' rights [2] Summary by Sections - **Legal Context**: The court found that Xiao Tong, being only 14 years old, lacked the legal capacity to engage in the transactions without parental consent, rendering the contract invalid [1] - **Regulatory Framework**: The case references a 2021 directive from the Central Cyberspace Administration of China that prohibits minors from engaging in support and consumption activities related to celebrities [1] - **Responsibility and Liability**: The court determined that A Wei, as the service provider, bore primary responsibility for the invalid contract due to encouraging minors to engage in irrational spending, while Xiao Tong's guardian also had some fault for not adequately supervising her online activities [2] - **Financial Outcome**: The court ordered A Wei to refund approximately 43,600 yuan to Xiao Tong, reflecting a shared responsibility for the situation [2] - **Recommendations**: The ruling emphasizes the need for guardians to closely monitor minors' online spending and for entertainment companies to adhere to legal standards to protect minors [2]