智驾魔盒

Search documents
醉酒司机深夜无人驾驶 "智驾神器”滥用风险引关注
Jing Ji Guan Cha Wang· 2025-09-27 22:54
一位酒驾司机借助"智驾神器",在深夜开启"无人驾驶"模式,车辆自己开了20分钟后,停在路中央启动"报警"模式,司机则在副驾上酣睡不醒。这一匪夷所 思的事件,日前在杭州上演。 9月26日,浙江杭州"临平检察"公众号发布了一起案件信息,新华社公众号在27日上午转发了该内容:9月13日凌晨2时许,浙江杭州,一辆打着双闪灯的小 客车停在了道路中央,阻拦后方车辆通行。过路群众发现异常前来查看,发现该车辆主驾驶位空着,仅有副驾驶座上躺着一名男子,车内中控台还显示 着"报警"提示,随即报了警。 警方调阅监控画面发现,上述小客车的车主王某某在醉酒状态下,借助在方向盘上加装"智驾神器","蒙骗"了智驾警报系统,让车辆违规无人驾驶。 这一事件将智能辅助驾驶被"滥用"的风险,具象化地呈现在公众视线中。记者在网购平台上了解到,随着智能辅助驾驶技术的升级和普及,"智驾神器"也开 始从简易的配重式配件,升级为更隐秘的插入式方向盘电子配件,甚至能做到数百公里无接管。 醉驾司机的骇人操作 综合"临平检察"和"绍兴网"披露的信息,上述案件中的小客车车主王某某在9月12日晚聚餐期间喝了白酒和啤酒,9月13日凌晨1点17分,王某某驾车上路并 开启 ...
男子酒后躺在副驾驶睡觉,用“智驾神器”开车20分钟!法院判了→
新浪财经· 2025-09-27 06:35
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a case in Hangzhou where a man was convicted of dangerous driving after using an "intelligent driving device" while intoxicated, leading to a 20-minute period of the vehicle operating without a driver in the main seat [2][4][10]. Group 1: Incident Details - On September 13, a car was found stopped in the middle of the road with the driver absent from the main seat, prompting bystanders to call the police [3]. - The vehicle's owner, identified as Wang, had moved from the driver's seat to the passenger seat while the car was in motion, with the vehicle operating for 20 minutes without a driver [4][8]. - Wang's blood alcohol content was measured at 114.5 mg/100ml, indicating he was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the incident [4]. Group 2: Technology and Regulations - The vehicle involved was equipped with a Level 2 intelligent driving assistance system, which requires the driver to remain engaged and ready to take control [6][10]. - Wang used a device known as "intelligent driving gadget" to trick the system into believing he was still in control, allowing the vehicle to operate autonomously [10][12]. - According to national standards, Level 2 automation requires the driver to supervise the system and be ready to intervene, which Wang failed to do [10]. Group 3: Legal Consequences - The court found Wang guilty of dangerous driving, resulting in a sentence of one month and fifteen days of detention, along with a fine of 4,000 yuan [10]. - The case underscores the legal responsibilities associated with the use of intelligent driving technologies, emphasizing that both manufacturers and users may face legal repercussions [18]. Group 4: Market Implications - The article notes that such "intelligent driving gadgets" are readily available for purchase online, raising concerns about their impact on road safety [12][13]. - The local prosecutor's office plans to enhance regulatory measures and public awareness regarding the safe use of intelligent driving technologies [17].