low 日 4 眼下，智能驾驶普及率正不断提升，而用户始终坚守法规红线，才是安全驾驶的根本。 近日，央视曝光了可以"托管方向盘"的"智驾神器"，通过安装在方向盘上的一个小装置，欺骗车辆辅助驾驶系统实现"脱手驾驶"。有关专家指出，这不 仅严重威胁道路交通安全，更触碰了法律红线，还将扰乱智能网联汽车产业的健康发展秩序。 "智驾神器"就是"凶器" 所谓"智驾神器"，打着"方向盘装饰环"、"电容辅助环" 、"通用车把套"、"长途驾驶好帮手"、"缓解驾驶疲劳"等旗号，可以安装在方向盘上，当车辆开 启辅助驾驶功能时，能让车辆辅助驾驶系统误认为驾驶员双手始终在方向盘上，从而实现"双手脱手不报警"。 央视曝光案例显示，加装"智驾神器"的车辆在测试中闯红灯、撞栅栏、毁气囊，多项安全机制完全失效，可造成车毁人亡及危及路上车辆、人员、设施 等安全的严重后果。 测试表明，安装了"智驾神器"的车辆，在行驶到路口时，对红灯信号熟视无睹，径直冲过路口，完全无视交通规则和其他车辆行人的安全。当遇到前方 突然出现的栅栏类障碍物时，车辆没有任何减速或避让的动作，直接撞了上去，车头瞬间变形，安全气囊也因巨大的冲击力瞬间弹出。如果这是在真实的道 路 ...

央视曝光智 0:00 驾神器成夺命陷阱 商家知法犯法销售致命智驾神器 ...

当智能驾驶成为车企核心的卖点，一种被称为"智驾神器"的灰色产品正悄然在电商平台流通。 它们看似只是简简单单的方向盘"装饰环""助力球"等，却能让汽车辅助驾驶系统的"脱手检测"功能沦为 摆设，成为危害道路安全的"凶器"。 调查发现，这些"装饰贴"实际上是欺骗车辆辅助驾驶系统的"智驾神器"，核心功能为"智驾免提示"，即 在驾驶者双手离开方向盘时，车辆不会触发报警，实现所谓的"全程免接管"自动驾驶体验。 据央视财经12月7日报道，当前市场上一些不法商家利用监管漏洞，推出所谓的"智驾神器"。这些产品 被宣传为"智驾免提示"，即在驾驶者双手离开方向盘时，车辆不会触发报警，提供虚假的自动驾驶体 验。 9月13日凌晨，杭州市临平区南苑街道发生一起交通事故，一辆汽车离奇停在道路中央，副驾驶男子昏 睡不醒，过路群众紧急报警。经调查，该男子从主驾驶挪到副驾驶后，车辆在"无人驾驶"的状态下行驶 了20分钟，酒精检测结果114.5毫克/100毫升。 该车辆能够实现"无人驾驶"，是因为车主加装了所谓的"智驾神器"，最终该男子因危险驾驶罪获刑拘役 一个半月，并处罚金4000元。 "智驾神器"不仅让驾驶员产生错误的安全感，放松警惕，更直接 ...

来源：@中国经济周刊微博 【#央视曝光智驾神器成夺命陷阱# 】记者在一些电商平台发现，一些不法商家钻监管漏洞，推出些所 谓"方向盘装饰贴"，实为欺骗车辆辅助驾驶系统的"智驾神器"，当驾驶者双手离开方向盘时，车辆不会 触发报警，从而实现"全程免接管"的虚假自动驾驶体验。有商家告诉记者，这款产品研发门槛极低、使 用存在诸多风险，每次车辆重启后，需要重新安装。此外，"智驾神器"连接线易缠绕方向盘影响操控， 而"芯片模块"的安装更需拆卸方向盘气囊和内部结构。商家明确告诉记者，使用"智驾神器"时手脱离方 向盘属于违反交规，只要别被交警或摄像头看到就好。《中华人民共和国道路交通安全法实施条例》明 确指出，驾驶机动车时不得有拨打接听手持电话，妨碍安全驾驶的行为。在这些生产销售所谓"智驾神 器"的商家眼里，国家法律法规明令禁止的行为，反而成了他们绞尽脑汁规避监管谋取利益的重点方 向。（央视财经） 来源：@中国经济周刊微博 【#央视曝光智驾神器成夺命陷阱# 】记者在一些电商平台发现，一些不法商家钻监管漏洞，推出些所 谓"方向盘装饰贴"，实为欺骗车辆辅助驾驶系统的"智驾神器"，当驾驶者双手离开方向盘时，车辆不会 触发报警，从而实 ...

（央视财经《财经调查》）一些不法商家钻监管漏洞，推出所谓"智驾神器"规避车辆安全监控。测试员 安装上多款神器进行测试发现，车辆方向盘上安装了"智驾神器"后，驾驶人双手离开方向盘，原本的接 管提醒、报警、退出巡航等安全机制全部失效，相当危险。在"神器"的作用下，当"移动式道路交通信 号灯"显示为红色时，如果驾驶人没有关注到路况，车辆会直接向前行驶，无视红灯提醒。面对"栅栏类 障碍物"，使用"智驾神器"后，如果驾驶人没有注意到"栅栏类障碍物"，车辆可能会直接撞上"障碍 物"。检测人员明确指出，当前智驾系统仍无法应对所有复杂路况和突发情况，"驾驶人才是驾驶的第一 责任人"。依赖"智驾神器"欺骗系统，本质是将自己和他人的生命安全当作赌注。公安部道路交通安全 部门提醒，驾驶人是车辆行驶安全的操控者，要了解车辆辅助驾驶功能的技术能力和范围边界，不能对 道路安全造成风险。 转载请注明央视财经 编辑：令文芳 ...

商家明确告诉记者，使用"智驾神器"时手脱离方向盘属于违反交规，只要别被交警或摄像头看到就好。 《中华人民共和国道路交通安全法实施条例》明确指出，驾驶机动车时不得有拨打接听手持电话，妨碍 安全驾驶的行为。在这些生产销售所谓"智驾神器"的商家眼里，国家法律法规明令禁止的行为，反而成 了他们绞尽脑汁规避监管谋取利益的重点方向。 转载请注明央视财经 （央视财经《财经调查》）总台《财经调查》记者在一些电商平台发现，一些不法商家钻监管漏洞，推 出些所谓"方向盘装饰贴"，实为欺骗车辆辅助驾驶系统的"智驾神器"，当驾驶者双手离开方向盘时，车 辆不会触发报警，从而实现"全程免接管"的虚假自动驾驶体验。有商家告诉记者，这款产品研发门槛极 低、使用存在诸多风险，每次车辆重启后，需要重新安装。此外，"智驾神器"连接线易缠绕方向盘影响 操控，而"芯片模块"的安装更需拆卸方向盘气囊和内部结构。 编辑：令文芳 ...

（央视财经《财经调查》）一些不法商家钻监管漏洞，推出所谓"智驾神器"规避车辆安全监控，不仅严重威胁道路交通安全，更触碰了法律红线，扰乱了新 能源汽车产业的健康发展秩序。 "智驾作弊器"骗过系统实现"脱手"驾驶 隐患重重之下明令禁止依旧隐蔽销售 记者在多地汽配城展开实地调查，却并未发现案件中出现的"智驾神器"，经知情人指点，记者才在电商平台上以"方向盘装饰环""通用车把套"等关键词搜索 到这类产品。 在一些网络直播间里，一些主播对这个产品的功能，也始终含糊其词、避重就轻。 《中华人民共和国道路交通安全法实施条例》明确指出：驾驶机动车时不得有拨打接听手持电话，妨碍安全驾驶的行为。 在这些生产销售所谓"智驾神器"的商家眼里，国家法律法规明令禁止的行为，反而成了他们绞尽脑汁规避监管谋取利益的重点方向。 艾唯娜精品电商平台商家告诉记者，这款产品研发门槛极低、使用存在诸多风险，每次车辆重启后，需要重新安装，否则可能导致智驾系统中途退出。商家 甚至告诉记者，使用"智驾神器"时手脱离方向盘属于违反交规，只要别被交警或摄像头看到就好。 "芯片模块"隐藏方向盘内部 记者在"珠珠好爱M9"直播间，以169元从"领航装饰用品"店购入 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the growing concerns regarding the misuse of intelligent driving assistance systems, particularly in light of recent incidents involving dangerous driving behaviors and the legal implications associated with them [1][3][4]. Group 1: Incidents and Public Concerns - A notable incident in Hangzhou involved a driver, Wang, who was found sleeping in the passenger seat while the car drove itself for 20 minutes, raising public alarm about the misuse of intelligent driving technology [1][3]. - Wang was later sentenced to 45 days in detention and fined 4,000 yuan for dangerous driving, with his blood alcohol content measured at 114.5 mg/100ml, indicating drunk driving [3][4]. - Reports indicate a rise in dangerous driving behaviors associated with intelligent driving systems, including drivers sleeping while the vehicle is in motion and using the system while distracted by mobile devices [3][4]. Group 2: Legal Responsibility and Misconceptions - Many drivers mistakenly equate advanced driver-assistance systems with fully autonomous driving, leading to a lack of awareness regarding their legal responsibilities [4][5]. - Judicial authorities have clarified that the driver remains the primary responsible party in the event of an accident, regardless of the technology used [5][6]. - The legal principle of "responsibility for one's actions" is emphasized, indicating that drivers cannot shift blame to the technology for their negligence [5][6]. Group 3: Regulatory and Safety Recommendations - Experts suggest that there is an urgent need for stricter regulation of intelligent driving technologies and the sale of related devices that enable misuse [6][7]. - It is recommended that companies enhance user education regarding the limitations and risks associated with intelligent driving systems to promote safer usage [6][7]. - The fundamental safety principle of keeping hands on the wheel and eyes on the road remains crucial, even as technology evolves [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the emergence of "smart driving gadgets" that undermine vehicle safety by circumventing driver monitoring systems, raising concerns about road safety and regulatory responses [1][5]. Group 1: Product Overview - "Smart driving gadgets" are being sold under various names like "smart driving companion" and "steering wheel decoration," allowing users to bypass safety features [3][4]. - These products include two main types: capacitive straps for brands like AITO and Xiaomi, and weighted rings for brands like BYD and Tesla [3][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Response - A draft national standard titled "Motor Vehicle Operation Safety Technical Conditions" has been proposed, aiming to enhance safety requirements for driver monitoring systems [1][5]. - The effectiveness of this regulation is questioned, as these gadgets continue to be sold online despite the impending regulations [5]. Group 3: Responsibility and Liability - Sellers of "smart driving gadgets" may face civil liability for promoting products that circumvent vehicle safety systems, potentially leading to indirect infringement if accidents occur [8][9]. - E-commerce platforms could also bear joint liability if they fail to monitor and regulate the sale of these illegal products [9]. Group 4: Technical Insights - Current vehicle technology relies on torque sensors and capacitive sensors to detect driver engagement, which these gadgets can deceive [4][11]. - The proliferation of these gadgets is partly due to consumer misconceptions about the capabilities of Level 2 (L2) autonomous driving systems, which are often misrepresented by manufacturers [11][12]. Group 5: Recommendations for Improvement - To combat the issue, a multi-faceted approach is suggested, including the use of AI for monitoring sales, stricter regulations on production, and enhanced consumer education [12].

Core Viewpoint - The rise of "smart driving gadgets" poses a significant threat to road safety, as they allow drivers to bypass safety features in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) [1][2][3] Group 1: Product Overview - "Smart driving gadgets" are being sold under various names such as "smart driving companions" and "steering wheel decorations" to evade platform scrutiny [2] - These products include two main types: capacitive straps for brands like AITO and Xiaomi, and weighted rings for brands like BYD and Tesla [2] - The gadgets deceive the vehicle's sensors, rendering the hand detection feature of ADAS ineffective [3] Group 2: Regulatory Response - The Ministry of Public Security has proposed a new national standard that includes stricter safety requirements for ADAS, focusing on hand and gaze detection [1][4] - Despite the proposed regulations, the sale of "smart driving gadgets" continues on e-commerce platforms, indicating a need for collaborative efforts to address the issue [4] Group 3: Legal Responsibility - Sellers of "smart driving gadgets" may face civil liability for selling products that knowingly circumvent vehicle safety systems [6][7] - E-commerce platforms could also be held liable if they fail to monitor and control the sale of these illegal products [6][7] Group 4: Market Dynamics - The misconception that current autonomous driving technology is sufficiently advanced for hands-free driving is a significant factor in the demand for "smart driving gadgets" [8][9] - Misleading marketing by car manufacturers has contributed to consumer confusion regarding the capabilities of Level 2 (L2) autonomous driving systems [8][9] Group 5: Recommendations for Improvement - A multi-faceted approach is needed to combat the proliferation of "smart driving gadgets," including enhanced monitoring by e-commerce platforms, stricter regulations from authorities, and better consumer education [9]