Workflow
智驾神器
icon
Search documents
新华网视评|靠“智驾神器”,无异于“智障行为”
Xin Hua She· 2025-10-05 03:28
Core Points - A recent incident in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, where a man used a "smart driving device" while intoxicated has raised significant concerns about road safety and the misuse of driving assistance technologies [1][2] - The man modified his vehicle's steering system with a device that deceives the car's driver assistance system, allowing the vehicle to operate without human control while he was asleep in the passenger seat [1] - The incident highlights the dangers of such devices, which are designed to bypass safety features, and the legal repercussions that can follow, including a conviction for dangerous driving and a fine of 4,000 yuan [1] Industry Implications - The use of "smart driving devices" poses a serious threat to road safety, as they can mislead both the vehicle's systems and the legal framework surrounding driving responsibilities [2] - Current technology does not support fully autonomous driving, and reliance on deceptive devices can lead to severe consequences, both legally and in terms of public safety [2] - The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of adhering to legal standards and maintaining driving responsibility, emphasizing that such devices should not be considered a substitute for safe driving practices [2]
靠“智驾神器” 无异于“智障行为”
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-10-02 01:23
Group 1 - A recent incident in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, where a man drove under the influence using a device called "smart driving tool," has raised significant concerns about road safety [1] - The device, which can deceive the vehicle's steering wheel detection system, allowed the man to sleep in the passenger seat while the car operated autonomously, leading to dangerous situations [1] - The man was ultimately convicted of dangerous driving, receiving a sentence of one month and fifteen days in detention, along with a fine of 4,000 yuan [1] Group 2 - The use of "smart driving tools" is considered a serious violation of safe driving practices, as highlighted by the Ministry of Public Security's Road Traffic Safety Research Center, which stated that such devices can lead to severe legal consequences and liability in case of accidents [2] - The current technological capabilities do not support fully autonomous driving, and while these tools may trick sensors, they cannot evade legal repercussions or the inherent dangers of impaired driving [2]
车主酒后用辅助驾驶睡20多分钟被拘役,华为高管:说明我们的系统非常好
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-09-30 03:28
Core Viewpoint - The incident involving a user misusing Huawei's assisted driving system highlights both the effectiveness of the technology and the urgent need for responsible usage, especially regarding alcohol consumption while driving [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On September 13, a driver in Hangzhou used Huawei's assisted driving system while intoxicated, resulting in the vehicle driving for over 20 minutes without anyone in the driver's seat before stopping [3][5]. - The driver, identified as Wang, was found to have a blood alcohol content of 114.5 mg/100ml and was subsequently charged with dangerous driving, leading to a sentence of 1.5 months in detention and a fine of 4000 yuan [5][6]. Group 2: Legal and Safety Implications - This case marks the first instance of dangerous driving involving an intelligent assisted driving system in the region, emphasizing that the driver remains legally responsible even when using such technology [6][9]. - Legal experts assert that the use of assisted driving systems does not transfer responsibility from the driver, and intoxicated driving still constitutes a violation of the law [8][9]. Group 3: Technology and Industry Impact - The incident raises concerns about the misuse of devices like the so-called "smart driving gadgets" that deceive vehicle monitoring systems, potentially compromising safety and data integrity [7][9]. - Industry professionals warn that such modifications not only endanger individual safety but also hinder the overall development and reliability of assisted driving technologies [7][8].
酒后使用智能驾驶 构成危险驾驶罪吗?
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-09-28 20:10
央视网消息:"喝酒不开车,开车不喝酒"是一条驾驶"铁律"。如今,随着智能驾驶技术的迅速发展,有人就心生侥幸了。 刚才片子里有提到一个词——"智驾神器"。相关法律人士介绍,商家公开售卖的所谓"智驾神器",无论是生产、销售还是使用均属于违法 行为。 ...
醉酒司机深夜无人驾驶 "智驾神器”滥用风险引关注
Jing Ji Guan Cha Wang· 2025-09-27 22:54
Core Viewpoint - The incident involving a drunk driver using a "smart driving device" to operate a vehicle autonomously highlights the risks associated with the misuse of intelligent driving assistance systems [3][4][5]. Group 1: Incident Details - On September 13, a driver in Hangzhou, under the influence of alcohol, used a device to trick the vehicle's intelligent driving system, allowing it to drive for 20 minutes without anyone in the driver's seat [4][5]. - The vehicle was equipped with an L2 level intelligent driving assistance system, which is designed to alert the driver if hands are removed from the steering wheel for more than two minutes [4][14]. - The driver, identified as Wang, had a history of drunk driving and was subsequently sentenced to 45 days in detention and fined 4,000 yuan for dangerous driving [5][15]. Group 2: Technology and Misuse - The "smart driving device," referred to as "智驾神器," has evolved from simple weighted accessories to more sophisticated electronic modules that can deceive the vehicle's monitoring systems [6][7]. - These devices are marketed online and are designed to bypass the driver monitoring systems, allowing for extended periods of hands-free driving [6][7]. - The rise of high-level intelligent driving systems has led to the development of customized "smart boxes" for specific vehicle brands, which can maintain autonomous driving without driver intervention [7][14]. Group 3: Regulatory and Safety Concerns - The incident underscores the need for stricter regulations and oversight regarding the production, sale, and use of such devices, as current laws do not adequately address the risks posed by external modifications to driving systems [14][15]. - Authorities emphasize that intelligent driving requires human oversight and should not be mistaken for full automation, warning against the dangers of using such devices [15].
男子酒后用“智驾神器”驾车被判刑 所谓解放双手的“智驾神器”为何用不得?
Yang Guang Wang· 2025-09-27 16:07
金洁芸进一步介绍:"他醉酒驾驶机动车在道路上行驶的行为已经触犯了《中华人民共和国刑法》 第一百三十三条之一的规定,涉嫌危险驾驶罪,公安机关也依法对其采取了刑事拘留的强制措施。我们 综合全案的情节,以及王某某曾经在两年内有酒驾记录这一情况,于2025年的9月17日依法对王某某提 起公诉,并提出了拘役1个月15日,并处罚金人民币4000元的量刑建议。9月19日,人民法院适用速裁程 序开庭审理了这个案件,并当庭判决王某某犯危险驾驶罪,采纳了检察机关的量刑建议。王某某也表示 服判。" 金洁芸还表示,这是当地首起使用智能辅助驾驶系统的危险驾驶案,和常见的危险驾驶罪的表现形 式有所不同。 金洁芸说:"我们也是通过逐帧去对比行车记录仪、道路监控,包括车辆的后台数据等,准确还原 案发经过,又通过查询车辆的自动化等级,相关的技术标准,以及参照最高检发布的典型案例,最终准 确认定王某某开启L2级别的需要人车共驾的辅助系统,在道路上面行驶是一种驾驶行为,因此应当承 担醉酒驾驶的法律责任。" 为什么主驾驶位上无人,车辆还能自动驾驶?据了解,王某某这辆车是今年5月购买的,装有2级智 能辅助系统。按照车辆系统设定,驾驶车辆时,一旦双手脱 ...
男子酒后躺在副驾驶睡觉,用“智驾神器”开车20分钟!法院判了→
新浪财经· 2025-09-27 06:35
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a case in Hangzhou where a man was convicted of dangerous driving after using an "intelligent driving device" while intoxicated, leading to a 20-minute period of the vehicle operating without a driver in the main seat [2][4][10]. Group 1: Incident Details - On September 13, a car was found stopped in the middle of the road with the driver absent from the main seat, prompting bystanders to call the police [3]. - The vehicle's owner, identified as Wang, had moved from the driver's seat to the passenger seat while the car was in motion, with the vehicle operating for 20 minutes without a driver [4][8]. - Wang's blood alcohol content was measured at 114.5 mg/100ml, indicating he was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the incident [4]. Group 2: Technology and Regulations - The vehicle involved was equipped with a Level 2 intelligent driving assistance system, which requires the driver to remain engaged and ready to take control [6][10]. - Wang used a device known as "intelligent driving gadget" to trick the system into believing he was still in control, allowing the vehicle to operate autonomously [10][12]. - According to national standards, Level 2 automation requires the driver to supervise the system and be ready to intervene, which Wang failed to do [10]. Group 3: Legal Consequences - The court found Wang guilty of dangerous driving, resulting in a sentence of one month and fifteen days of detention, along with a fine of 4,000 yuan [10]. - The case underscores the legal responsibilities associated with the use of intelligent driving technologies, emphasizing that both manufacturers and users may face legal repercussions [18]. Group 4: Market Implications - The article notes that such "intelligent driving gadgets" are readily available for purchase online, raising concerns about their impact on road safety [12][13]. - The local prosecutor's office plans to enhance regulatory measures and public awareness regarding the safe use of intelligent driving technologies [17].
凌晨1点半 杭州一男子酒后在副驾睡觉 车辆自动驾驶行驶20分钟 网友:太吓人!法院判了
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-09-26 15:33
9月26日,浙江杭州"临平检察"披露的一起案件,引发关注,网友直呼"太吓人"。 男子酒后副驾睡觉 当日凌晨3时11分,经检测,王某某血液中乙醇含量达114.5mg/100ml。到案后,王某某承认其于9月12日晚至次日凌晨与朋友吃夜宵,喝多了酒,因此抱 着侥幸心理让车辆自动驾驶。 为何驾驶位无人还能自动驾驶? 为什么主驾驶位上无人,车辆还能自动驾驶? 王某某这辆小客车是今年5月购买的,装有2级智能辅助系统。按照车辆系统设定,驾驶车辆时,一旦双手脱离方向盘、使用该辅助系统超过2分钟,系统 就会提示驾驶人员接管方向盘,否则会主动降速并退出系统,以此确保行车安全。 "该系统不允许驾驶员不在驾驶位操作,也不能代替驾驶员,系统简介中是有文字警告的,驾驶员不可能不知道。"该车辆销售公司的技术专家表示。 然而,为了"骗过"方向盘检测,王某某在方向盘上加装了一种被称为"智驾神器"的配件,让系统误以为驾驶人员的双手未脱离方向盘,使车辆持续保持无 人驾驶的状态。 车辆"智驾"行驶20分钟 据了解,9月13日凌晨2时许,浙江杭州,一辆打着双闪灯的小客车静静停在道路中央,阻拦后方车辆通行。过路群众发现异常前来查看,发现该车辆主驾 驶位 ...
凌晨1点半,杭州一男子酒后在副驾睡觉,车辆自动驾驶行驶20分钟,网友:太吓人!法院判了
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-09-26 14:51
Core Viewpoint - A recent incident in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, involving a driver using an intelligent driving assistance system while intoxicated has raised significant public concern regarding the safety and regulation of such technologies [2][4][7]. Group 1: Incident Details - On September 13, a vehicle was found parked in the middle of the road with the driver absent from the driver's seat, leading to a police report [2]. - The vehicle, owned by a man named Wang, operated for 20 minutes without a driver in the main seat, during which time the driver moved to the passenger seat and fell asleep [2][4]. - Wang's blood alcohol content was measured at 114.5 mg/100ml, indicating he was under the influence of alcohol [4]. Group 2: Technology and Safety Concerns - The vehicle was equipped with a Level 2 intelligent driving assistance system, which is designed to alert the driver if hands are removed from the steering wheel for more than two minutes [5]. - Wang used a device known as "smart driving gadget" to trick the system into believing that he was still in control, allowing the vehicle to operate autonomously [5][12]. - The sale of such devices is prevalent online, with many vendors offering products that can bypass safety features of intelligent driving systems [8][10]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Implications - The local prosecutor's office determined that Wang's actions constituted a violation of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, leading to charges of dangerous driving [7]. - Wang was sentenced to one month and fifteen days of detention and fined 4,000 yuan due to his prior record of driving under the influence [7]. - Authorities plan to enhance regulation and public awareness regarding the use of such devices to prevent future incidents and ensure road safety [12].
智驾神器“托管”方向盘,是给公共安全“埋雷”
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-09-25 10:11
Core Insights - The automotive industry is facing challenges with the misuse of intelligent assisted driving systems, prompting companies to enhance Driver Monitoring Systems (DMS) to create multi-layered safety mechanisms [1][2] - Some vehicle owners are circumventing DMS monitoring using "smart driving aids," which poses significant risks to driving safety and can lead to severe accidents [1][2] Group 1: Industry Response - Automotive companies are upgrading DMS technologies focusing on visual recognition, multi-modal biometric recognition, and physical feedback to effectively monitor and intervene in driver behavior [1] - Regulatory bodies have mandated that car manufacturers clarify marketing claims, emphasizing that current intelligent driving systems do not equate to fully autonomous driving capabilities [1] Group 2: Risks and Challenges - The emergence of "smart driving aids" that allow drivers to evade DMS monitoring is creating a false sense of security, potentially leading to dangerous driving situations and legal violations [1][2] - There is a need for stricter regulations and enforcement against the sale of these "smart driving aids," as they violate safety standards and contribute to unsafe driving practices [2] Group 3: Education and Awareness - It is crucial to educate drivers about the limitations of L2-level intelligent driving systems, which require constant monitoring and readiness to take control [2] - The automotive industry must address the influence of sales personnel and misleading marketing that promote the safety of assisted driving features, contributing to the misuse of these technologies [2]