当智能驾驶成为车企核心的卖点，一种被称为"智驾神器"的灰色产品正悄然在电商平台流通。它们看似只是简简单单的方向盘"装饰环""助力球"等，却能让汽车 辅助驾驶系统的"脱手检测"功能沦为摆设，成为危害道路安全的"凶器"。 近日，由公安部组织起草的《机动车运行安全技术条件》（以下简称《条件》）强制性国家标准征求意见稿发布，要求增加辅助驾驶汽车安全技术要求，包括增加 驾驶人手部脱离检测和视线脱离检测要求。手部脱离检测和视线脱离检测"双管齐下"，旨在从技术上解决"智驾神器"隐患。 《条件》尚待落地，但记者调查发现，"智驾神器"仍在以不同的名称或形式在电商平台销售，且覆盖了目前几乎全部的主流汽车品牌，商家、平台、买家、车企到 底谁该为安全买单？记者就此询问律师和业内人士寻求答案。 "神器"隐身：电商平台的猫鼠游戏 如今在各大电商平台和二手交易平台直接搜索"智驾神器"，已经难见其踪。但这类产品并没有真正消失，而是换了"马甲"继续流通，商家将其包装成"智驾伴侣""方 向盘装饰贴""方向盘配重环"等商品来规避平台审核。 记者以消费者身份进行咨询，大部分售卖"智驾神器"的商家面对询问时都保持警惕，以"懂的都懂"等含糊语言回复。但 ...

商家视频截图、图虫创意/供图 证券时报记者 安宇飞 当智能驾驶成为车企核心的卖点，一种被称为"智驾神器"的灰色产品正悄然在电商平台流通。它们看似 只是简简单单的方向盘"装饰环""助力球"等，却能让汽车辅助驾驶系统的"脱手检测"功能沦为摆设，成 为危害道路安全的"凶器"。 近日，由公安部组织起草的《机动车运行安全技术条件》（以下简称《条件》）强制性国家标准征求意 见稿发布，要求增加辅助驾驶汽车安全技术要求，包括增加驾驶人手部脱离检测和视线脱离检测要求。 手部脱离检测和视线脱离检测"双管齐下"，旨在从技术上解决"智驾神器"隐患。 《条件》尚待落地，但记者调查发现，"智驾神器"仍在以不同的名称或形式在电商平台销售，且覆盖了 目前几乎全部的主流汽车品牌，商家、平台、买家、车企到底谁该为安全买单？记者就此询问律师和业 内人士寻求答案。 "神器"隐身： 电商平台的猫鼠游戏 如今在各大电商平台和二手交易平台直接搜索"智驾神器"，已经难见其踪。但这类产品并没有真正消 失，而是换了"马甲"继续流通，商家将其包装成"智驾伴侣""方向盘装饰贴""方向盘配重环"等商品来规 避平台审核。 资深人工智能领域专家郭涛接受证券时报记者采访时 ...

当智能驾驶成为车企核心的卖点，一种被称为"智驾神器"的灰色产品正悄然在电商平台流通。它们看似 只是简简单单的方向盘"装饰环""助力球"等，却能让汽车辅助驾驶系统的"脱手检测"功能沦为摆设，成 为危害道路安全的"凶器"。 近日，由公安部组织起草的《机动车运行安全技术条件》（以下简称《条件》）强制性国家标准征求意 见稿发布，要求增加辅助驾驶汽车安全技术要求，包括增加驾驶人手部脱离检测和视线脱离检测要求。 手部脱离检测和视线脱离检测"双管齐下"，旨在从技术上解决"智驾神器"隐患。 《条件》尚待落地，但记者调查发现，"智驾神器"仍在以不同的名称或形式在电商平台销售，且覆盖了 目前几乎全部的主流汽车品牌，商家、平台、买家、车企到底谁该为安全买单？记者就此询问律师和业 内人士寻求答案。 "神器"隐身： 责任界定： 谁该为违法行为买单？ 电商平台的猫鼠游戏 如今在各大电商平台和二手交易平台直接搜索"智驾神器"，已经难见其踪。但这类产品并没有真正消 失，而是换了"马甲"继续流通，商家将其包装成"智驾伴侣""方向盘装饰贴""方向盘配重环"等商品来规 避平台审核。 记者以消费者身份进行咨询，大部分售卖"智驾神器"的商家面对询问时 ...

当智能驾驶成为车企核心的卖点，一种被称为"智驾神器"的灰色产品正悄然在电商平台流通。它们看似 只是简简单单的方向盘"装饰环""助力球"等，却能让汽车辅助驾驶系统的"脱手检测"功能沦为摆设，成 为危害道路安全的"凶器"。 近日，由公安部组织起草的《机动车运行安全技术条件》（以下简称《条件》）强制性国家标准征求意 见稿发布，要求增加辅助驾驶汽车安全技术要求，包括增加驾驶人手部脱离检测和视线脱离检测要求。 手部脱离检测和视线脱离检测"双管齐下"，旨在从技术上解决"智驾神器"隐患。 《条件》尚待落地，但记者调查发现，"智驾神器"仍在以不同的名称或形式在电商平台销售，且覆盖了 目前几乎全部的主流汽车品牌，商家、平台、买家、车企到底谁该为安全买单？记者就此询问律师和业 内人士寻求答案。 "神器"隐身： 电商平台的猫鼠游戏 如今在各大电商平台和二手交易平台直接搜索"智驾神器"，已经难见其踪。但这类产品并没有真正消 失，而是换了"马甲"继续流通，商家将其包装成"智驾伴侣""方向盘装饰贴""方向盘配重环"等商品来规 避平台审核。 记者以消费者身份进行咨询，大部分售卖"智驾神器"的商家面对询问时都保持警惕，以"懂的都懂"等含 糊 ...

近来，一种被称作"智驾神器"的方向盘配重块在网络上"走红"。这些售价数十元的小装置，号称能让车 主获得"全程免接管"的自动驾驶体验。它看似小巧智能，实则是用来欺骗车辆辅助驾驶系统的"作弊 器"，藏着不小的安全隐患。 当前，市面上部分智能驾驶系统要求驾驶员必须手握方向盘，一旦系统检测到手部离开，便会发出警 报。所谓"智驾神器"正是在这个环节钻空子——通过模拟手部压力或发送红外信号，让系统误以为驾驶 员仍在操控方向盘。这种以欺骗手段逃避安全监测的做法，无疑将自己和他人置于巨大的风险之中。 铲除"智驾神器"生存土壤，汽车企业应持续优化系统的监测逻辑与交互提醒，提升系统的精准性与抗干 扰能力。电商平台需加强对此类伪科技产品的审核力度，内容平台则应及时清理相关推广视频，阻断其 传播。监管部门也需加大对销售使用"智驾神器"等行为的执法力度，同时推动完善相关技术标准，督促 行业建立更可靠的身份验证与行为监测机制。 驾驶技术创新是为了让出行更安全、更便捷，而非制造新的风险。在迈向高阶自动驾驶的道路上，须臾 不可或缺的是驾驶者心中紧绷的安全弦。唯有守住安全底线，智能驾驶技术才能真正行稳致远。 （摘编自《科技日报》，原题为《"智 ...

Core Insights - A device known as "Smart Driving Artifact" has gained popularity online, claiming to provide a "hands-free" autonomous driving experience, but it is essentially a tool to deceive vehicle assistance systems [1][2] - The device exploits a loophole in current Level 2 (L2) driver assistance systems, which require drivers to keep their hands on the steering wheel, posing significant safety risks [1][2] Industry Concerns - The misuse of such devices reflects a blind trust in technology and a severe lack of safety awareness among some drivers, highlighting the need for increased consumer vigilance and awareness [2] - The automotive industry must enhance the monitoring logic and interaction alerts of their systems to improve accuracy and resistance to interference [2] - E-commerce platforms should strengthen the review process for such pseudo-technological products, while content platforms need to remove promotional materials that encourage their use [2] - Regulatory bodies must intensify enforcement against the use of devices like the "Smart Driving Artifact" and work towards improving technical standards for smart connected vehicles [2]

Core Insights - A device known as "Smart Driving Artifact" has gained popularity online, claiming to provide a "hands-free" autonomous driving experience, but it is essentially a tool to deceive vehicle assistance systems, posing significant safety risks [1][2] Group 1: Product Overview - The "Smart Driving Artifact" is a low-cost device that tricks the vehicle's driver assistance system into believing the driver is still in control by simulating hand pressure or sending infrared signals [1] - Current intelligent driving systems in vehicles sold in the domestic market are still classified as Level 2 assistance, which requires driver supervision and intervention in complex situations [1] Group 2: Safety Concerns - The misuse of such devices reflects a dangerous blind trust in technology and a severe lack of safety awareness among some drivers, equating the bypassing of safety mechanisms with a disregard for life [2] - The device undermines the critical human oversight necessary for safe driving, especially in scenarios requiring immediate driver intervention [1][2] Group 3: Industry Response - Automotive companies are urged to enhance the monitoring logic and interaction alerts of their systems to improve accuracy and resistance to interference [2] - E-commerce platforms should strengthen the review process for such pseudo-technological products, while content platforms need to remove promotional materials related to these devices [2] - Regulatory bodies must increase enforcement against the use of such devices and promote the establishment of reliable identity verification and behavior monitoring mechanisms for smart connected vehicles [2]

Core Viewpoint - Recent court cases regarding drunk driving highlight the importance of driver responsibility and the limitations of technology in circumventing legal obligations [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Implications - The Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court upheld a sentence of three months' detention and a fine of 6,000 yuan for a defendant who claimed to use automatic driving features while driving under the influence [1]. - A case in Hangzhou involved a defendant who used a so-called "smart driving device" while sleeping in the passenger seat, resulting in a conviction for dangerous driving [1]. - These cases collectively send a clear message that technological advancements cannot override legal responsibilities, emphasizing the rigidity of judicial rulings in the context of "smart driving" applications [1][4]. Group 2: Consumer Awareness and Misuse - There is a growing concern about consumers misinterpreting driver assistance technologies as substitutes for human drivers, leading to dangerous behaviors such as modifying vehicles to bypass safety systems [2][3]. - The proliferation of aftermarket "smart driving devices" has created a gray market, complicating regulatory efforts due to their ambiguous legal status [2][3]. - Public awareness campaigns are needed to clarify that driver assistance systems are meant to assist, not replace, human control, urging consumers to remain vigilant while using these technologies [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Recommendations - The government and industry organizations should collaborate to promote awareness that "driver assistance is not autonomous driving," using real case studies to illustrate legal boundaries [3]. - There is a call for regulatory bodies to address the oversight gaps in the aftermarket sector, ensuring that companies producing non-compliant devices are held accountable [4]. - Future legal frameworks should clearly delineate responsibilities associated with different levels of driving assistance and consider incorporating these regulations into driver licensing processes [3][4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal implications and dangers associated with the use of "smart driving devices" that can deceive vehicle systems, highlighting a recent case where a driver was penalized for using such a device while intoxicated [5]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On September 13, a man named Wang in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, was found sleeping in the passenger seat while his vehicle, equipped with a "smart driving device," drove for 20 minutes before stopping in the middle of the road [3]. - Wang was later convicted of dangerous driving and sentenced to one month and fifteen days in detention, along with a fine of 4,000 yuan [3]. Group 2: Definition and Legal Context - "Smart driving devices" are accessories that can trick a vehicle's steering wheel detection system, allowing driving assistance systems to operate without the driver's hands on the wheel [5]. - The Public Security Ministry's Road Traffic Safety Research Center has stated that using such devices constitutes a violation of safe driving practices, leading to legal penalties, and if an accident occurs, the user may bear primary responsibility [5]. - Manufacturers, sellers, and users of these "smart driving devices" may face legal consequences, including charges for producing or selling products that do not meet safety standards [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the dangers and legal implications of using a so-called "smart driving artifact," which allows drivers to disengage from actively controlling their vehicles, posing significant risks to road safety [1][4][6]. Group 1: Product Description and Usage - The "smart driving artifact" is marketed as a "steering wheel decoration" and is sold online under various names, with prices ranging from 60 to 100 yuan [1][2]. - The product is designed to deceive the vehicle's driver monitoring system (DMS) by preventing alerts when the driver takes their hands off the wheel, which can lead to dangerous driving behavior [4][5]. Group 2: Testing and Expert Analysis - Testing conducted by experts revealed that when the artifact is installed, the vehicle's system fails to detect when the driver is not holding the steering wheel, leading to a lack of necessary safety alerts [3][4]. - Experts classify these devices as tools that circumvent safety measures, significantly increasing the risk of accidents [4][5]. Group 3: Legal Implications - The production and sale of such artifacts can lead to severe legal consequences, including imprisonment and fines, especially if they result in traffic accidents [6][7]. - E-commerce platforms are also held accountable if they fail to ensure the safety of products sold on their sites, potentially facing legal repercussions for negligence [7]. Group 4: Misunderstanding of Driving Assistance - Many drivers misunderstand the capabilities of their vehicles' driving assistance features, mistakenly believing they can fully disengage from driving tasks, which poses a serious threat to road safety [8][9]. - Current automotive technology in the market is classified as L2 level automation, requiring drivers to remain engaged and responsible for vehicle operation [9][10].