以下文章来源于牲产队 ，作者牲产队长 牲产队 . 挣工分，磨洋工，舒服一会儿是一会儿 作者： 牲产队长 来源： 牲产队 一次性逮捕十人，李嘉诚这一次是真的栽了。 5 月 21 日，香港廉政公署发布一个公告称，长实集团旗下的一个 " 港人首置盘 " 项目， 涉嫌行贿 受贿，偷工减料，被逮捕十人 。 啥叫 " 港人首置盘 " ？其实就类似于国内的刚需盘，年轻人买的第一套房。它的特点是，价格相对 便宜，但楼栋很高，房屋密集。 长实集团旗下的这个 " 港人首置盘 " ，一共才 6 栋大厦，却提供 3000 套房，每一栋设置 500 套 房。你想想，这个房屋密度有多高？按每户 5 口人算，这 6 栋楼，就要住进去 1.5 万人了。 可住的人越多，工程质量越重要。而长实集团呢？却在施工中， 偷工减料了，植入钢筋不足，还出 现了楼栋移位的问题 。为了掩饰这些问题，长实集团则采取了 " 行贿 " 方式。这就触碰底线了，十 人因行贿受贿罪被逮捕。 李嘉诚曾被誉为 " 商界教父 " ，更是 " 地产教父 " 了，一度被外界称为 " 李半城 " 。可他的地产生 意是怎么做起来的？这里面究竟有多少猫腻？在后台，队长经常看到很多网友留 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) has launched an operation named "Drumbeat" to investigate a corruption case involving the Cheung Kong Group's residential project, raising concerns about regulatory oversight and financial risks in the real estate sector [1][2]. Company Summary - The implicated project is a residential development on Anderson Road, acquired by Cheung Kong Group for HKD 49.5 billion in May 2020, aimed at providing nearly 3,000 housing units, with 1,000 units sold at a 20% discount to support first-time homebuyers [2]. - Cheung Kong Group has expressed "high concern" over the incident, supporting the ICAC's actions and collaborating with the Hong Kong Buildings Department for follow-up measures, asserting that the incident does not involve its employees [3]. - Financial data indicates that Cheung Kong Group's revenue for 2024 decreased by 3.63% to HKD 45.529 billion, with net profit down 21.24% to HKD 13.657 billion, primarily due to reduced property sales [3]. Industry Summary - The incident has sparked public skepticism regarding building safety and investor concerns about Cheung Kong's stock price and future project sales, with potential impacts on buyer confidence amid existing downward pressure in the Hong Kong property market [4]. - The "First Home Purchase Scheme," launched by the Hong Kong government in 2017 to alleviate home-buying pressures, may face scrutiny regarding its execution transparency due to this incident [4]. - The corruption case highlights regulatory gaps in subcontractor oversight and the challenges real estate companies face in balancing cost control with compliance, emphasizing the need for improved quality and regulatory adherence in the industry [5].