烧烤汁
Search documents
三年投资亏逾百万后黯然离场,得利斯陷业绩困局与合规危机
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-12-30 18:27
Core Viewpoint - The announcement of the equity change by Shandong Delisi Food Co., Ltd. reveals the failure of its expansion strategy outside the province, particularly in the prepared food sector, culminating in a loss exceeding one million yuan from its investment in Sichuan Dingdelisi Sauce Industry Co., Ltd. [1] Group 1: Investment and Financial Performance - Delisi invested 2.5 million yuan to acquire a 25% stake in Dingdelisi Sauce Industry in September 2022, aiming to leverage its advantages in raw materials and processing to expand into the southwestern market [2][3] - The investment in Dingdelisi has resulted in continuous losses, with reported losses of 400,400 yuan in 2023, 441,000 yuan in 2024, and 179,600 yuan in the first half of 2025, totaling 1,021,000 yuan over three years, reflecting a negative return on investment of 40.8% [4] - Delisi has faced significant financial challenges, reporting net losses of approximately 33.99 million yuan in 2023 and 33.67 million yuan in 2024, with revenues declining by about 4.1% to 2.965 billion yuan in 2024 [9][10] Group 2: Strategic Decisions and Market Position - Following Delisi's exit from Dingdelisi, the latter changed its name to remove "prepared food," indicating a shift away from this market segment, which has become a burden rather than an opportunity [6][8] - The exit and rebranding suggest a mutual recognition of the declining prospects in the prepared food sector, with both companies acknowledging the need to withdraw from a failing market [8] - Delisi's core business in chilled and frozen meat has also been under pressure, with revenues from this segment declining by 10.51% in 2024 and further decreasing by 1.25% in the first half of 2025, indicating a weakening position in its primary revenue source [13][14] Group 3: Compliance and Operational Challenges - Delisi has encountered compliance issues, including being suspended from military procurement activities due to allegations of submitting false materials, which raises concerns about its internal controls and operational integrity [19][20] - The repeated compliance violations suggest a lack of adequate oversight and management awareness of regulatory boundaries, potentially complicating future recovery efforts [20]