Core Viewpoint - Multiple cosmetic products have been found to contain the banned substance Sudan Red, leading to a significant safety crisis in the beauty industry, affecting over 800 products and more than 400 brands [1][2][3]. Group 1: Detection and Impact - A third-party testing agency, "Old Dad Testing," discovered Sudan Red in a skin care product, prompting further testing of similar products, all of which tested positive for the substance [1][2]. - The detected Sudan Red levels in various products ranged from 435 to 1982 micrograms per kilogram (ug/kg), with one raw material containing as much as 1170 parts per million (ppm) [2][3]. - The incident has implicated well-known brands such as Kiehl's, FARMACY, and others, with a total of over 800 products identified as containing the problematic ingredient [3][6]. Group 2: Regulatory and Supply Chain Issues - The presence of Sudan Red in cosmetics highlights a significant regulatory oversight in the supply chain, where manufacturers may have added the banned substance to enhance visual appeal [7][8]. - The source of the banned substance is traced back to a supplier in Singapore, which specializes in natural ingredients but has been linked to the inclusion of industrial dyes in cosmetic products [7][8]. - The incident has raised concerns about the reliance of smaller companies on overseas suppliers and the lack of independent testing capabilities, which could lead to safety vulnerabilities [8]. Group 3: Brand Responses and Consumer Guidance - Following the revelation, brands like Kiehl's and Huaxizi have responded by halting sales of affected products and initiating internal investigations [5][6]. - Consumers are advised to check their skincare products for specific ingredients, including Eclipta Prostrata extract, Melia Azadirachta leaf extract, and Moringa Oleifera seed oil, and to refrain from using products containing these until further testing results are available [9].

Core Viewpoint - The cosmetics industry is facing a significant controversy as a self-media outlet revealed the presence of the banned substance Sudan Red IV in various skincare products, raising consumer concerns about safety and brand integrity [1][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A video by "Old Dad Evaluation" detected Sudan Red IV in multiple skincare products, leading to consumer anxiety and brand scrutiny [1][3]. - The source of the contamination was traced to a questionable raw material group containing three components: mudfish extract, neem leaf extract, and moringa seed oil, with a Sudan Red content of 1170 ppm [1][3]. - Over 800 products have been implicated, affecting more than 400 brands, including both international and domestic names [4]. Group 2: Health Impact - Sudan Red IV is classified as a synthetic industrial dye and is listed as a Group 3 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), indicating it is an animal carcinogen but not proven to be carcinogenic to humans [5][6]. - The potential health risks from topical application are considered lower than those from ingestion, but long-term exposure could pose cumulative risks [8][9]. Group 3: Brand Responses - Many brands have issued minimal responses, with some products being removed from online platforms, while others remain available for purchase [9][10]. - Brands like Kiehl's and others emphasize compliance with regulations but have not addressed testing plans for Sudan Red [11][12]. - Consumer dissatisfaction is evident, with reports of difficulties in returning products and receiving adequate responses from customer service [13][14].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant controversy in the cosmetics industry related to the detection of the banned substance Sudan Red IV in various skincare products, raising consumer concerns and prompting investigations into the implicated brands [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A video by "Old Dad Evaluation" revealed the presence of Sudan Red IV in multiple skincare products, leading to widespread consumer anxiety [1][2]. - The source of the contamination was traced to a questionable raw material group containing fish gut extract, neem leaf extract, and moringa seed oil, with a detected concentration of 1170 ppm (1.17 g/kg) of Sudan Red [2][3]. - Over 800 products have been identified as potentially containing the problematic raw material group, affecting more than 400 brands, including both international and domestic names [4]. Group 2: Health Implications - Sudan Red is classified as a synthetic industrial dye and is listed as a Group 3 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), indicating it is an animal carcinogen but not proven to be carcinogenic to humans [6][7]. - The National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) has explicitly banned Sudan Red IV in cosmetics, highlighting the serious regulatory implications of its presence [7][11]. - Experts suggest that while the immediate risk from topical application may be lower than ingestion, long-term exposure could pose cumulative health risks [10][11]. Group 3: Brand Responses and Market Impact - Many implicated brands have responded minimally, with some products being removed from online platforms, while others remain available for purchase [12][14]. - Brands like Kiehl's and others have emphasized compliance with regulations but have not disclosed plans for testing their products for Sudan Red [14][15]. - The controversy has led to consumer confusion and anxiety, with reports of difficulties in obtaining refunds for potentially contaminated products [17][18]. Group 4: Regulatory and Industry Insights - The article highlights the challenges in ensuring product safety, noting that not all banned substances are routinely tested in cosmetics, which raises concerns about consumer safety [14][15]. - The presence of Sudan Red IV in cosmetics underscores the need for stricter oversight and transparency in ingredient sourcing and labeling within the beauty industry [18].