Core Viewpoint - A third-party testing agency has reported the presence of Sudan Red, a banned substance for 20 years, in multiple skincare products, raising concerns about product safety and regulatory compliance [1][5]. Group 1: Testing Results - The testing revealed that several skincare products contained Sudan Red IV, with concentrations ranging from 435 to 1982 µg/kg [1]. - The source of Sudan Red in these products is linked to ingredients such as "eel extract, neem leaf extract, and moringa seed oil," which are supplied by a company based in Singapore [5][7]. Group 2: Regulatory Context - Sudan Red IV is classified as a prohibited ingredient in cosmetics according to the "Cosmetic Prohibited Ingredients Directory" [3][5]. - The chemical is an artificial azo dye, primarily used for coloring in industrial applications, and is not permitted in food or cosmetic products in China [5][3]. Group 3: Industry Response - Several brands have responded by either conducting product tests or removing affected products from sale. For instance, "Hua Xizi" has taken its product offline while others like "Farmacy" and "Chillmore" are investigating supplier compliance [8][9]. - The involved supplier, Campo Research (S) Pte. Ltd, specializes in natural plant-based cosmetic ingredients and has a global distribution network [7][6].

Core Viewpoint - The beauty industry is facing a safety crisis due to the detection of the banned substance Sudan Red in various cosmetic products, raising public concern [1] Group 1: Detection of Banned Substance - A third-party testing agency, "Old Dad Testing," reported finding Sudan Red, a chemical dye banned globally since 2003, in multiple cosmetic products [1] - Sudan Red is classified as having genotoxic and potential carcinogenic risks, and it has been listed as a prohibited ingredient in cosmetics by the National Medical Products Administration since 2021 [1] Group 2: Brand Responses - Several brands, including Huaxizi, Tingyan, and Qiyou, have removed the questioned products from their online stores following the allegations [2] - Specific products such as Huaxizi's Peach Fresh Essence Cream and Tingyan's Collagen Essence have been taken down from their official flagship stores [2][8] - Qiyou's Squalane Fragrance Essence is still available but claims that the current stock is a new version, with the problematic batches sent for testing [2] Group 3: Source of Contamination - The source of the banned substance was traced back to a red ingredient containing extracts from Eclipta Prostrata, Melia Azadirachta, and Moringa Oleifera, with a Sudan Red concentration of 1170 ppm [3][4] - The supplier of this ingredient is identified as Campo Research (S) Pte. Ltd, a Singapore-based company specializing in natural plant-based cosmetic ingredients [4][6] Group 4: Industry Implications - The presence of Sudan Red in "natural" ingredients raises questions about the integrity of suppliers, as it was allegedly added to enhance color stability [6][7] - "Old Dad Testing" suggests that the addition of Sudan Red was a deliberate act by the supplier, leaving brands unaware of the contamination [7] Group 5: Ongoing Investigations - Brands are conducting urgent self-checks and sending products for third-party testing to confirm the presence of Sudan Red [11][13] - Some brands, like Kiehl's, have clarified that their current products do not contain the implicated ingredients and comply with national regulations [13]

Core Viewpoint - The beauty industry is facing a safety crisis due to the detection of the banned substance Sudan Red in multiple cosmetic products, raising public concern [1][5]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A third-party testing agency, "Old Dad Testing," reported finding Sudan Red, a chemical dye banned globally since 2003, in various cosmetics [1][5]. - Sudan Red is known for its genotoxicity and potential carcinogenic risks, and it has been listed as a prohibited ingredient in cosmetics by the National Medical Products Administration since 2021 [1][5]. - Several brands, including Huaxizi, Tingyan, and Qiyou, have responded by removing the affected products from their shelves [1][9]. Group 2: Testing and Findings - "Old Dad Testing" discovered that the source of Sudan Red was a red ingredient containing extracts from Eclipta Prostrata, Melia Azadirachta, and Moringa Oleifera, with a Sudan Red content of 1170 ppm [5][7]. - The testing agency conducted public sampling tests on multiple skincare products using the same ingredient, all of which tested positive for Sudan Red [9][10]. - The affected red ingredient was traced back to a Singapore-based supplier, Campo Research (S) Pte. Ltd, which specializes in natural plant-based cosmetic ingredients [5][7]. Group 3: Brand Responses - Brands implicated in the scandal, such as Huaxizi and Tingyan, have initiated product recalls and investigations into their suppliers [9][13]. - Huaxizi's customer service confirmed that they are conducting a strict investigation into the relevant raw material suppliers and have suspended sales of the affected products [9][13]. - Other brands, including Qiyou and Farmacy, are also conducting tests on their products, but some have been less forthcoming about whether their current products contain the problematic ingredients [15][16].

Core Viewpoint - The beauty industry is facing a safety crisis due to the detection of the banned substance Sudan Red in various cosmetic products, raising public concern [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A third-party testing agency, "Old Dad Testing," reported finding Sudan Red in multiple cosmetic products, which has been banned globally since 2003 due to its genotoxic and potential carcinogenic risks [1][2]. - The National Medical Products Administration of China has included Sudan Red I-IV in its list of banned substances for cosmetics since 2021 [1]. Group 2: Brand Responses - Several brands, including Huaxizi, Tingyan, and Qiyou, have removed the questioned products from their official stores [2][8]. - Huaxizi's Peach Fresh Essence Cream and Tingyan's Collagen Essence have been taken down, while Qiyou's Squalane Fragrance Essence is still available but claimed to be a new version [2][9]. - Brands are conducting investigations and sending products for testing to ensure compliance with safety standards [8][9]. Group 3: Source of Contamination - The source of Sudan Red was traced back to a red ingredient containing extracts from Eclipta Prostrata, Melia Azadirachta, and Moringa Oleifera, with a detected concentration of 1170 ppm [3][4]. - The supplier of this ingredient, Campo Research (S) Pte. Ltd., based in Singapore, has distributors in China [4][5]. Group 4: Industry Implications - The incident highlights the potential for raw material suppliers to intentionally add banned substances under the guise of natural ingredients for coloring purposes [5][6]. - The testing results indicated that multiple products contained Sudan Red IV, with concentrations ranging from 435 to 1982 µg/kg [8].

Core Viewpoint - The cosmetics industry is facing a significant controversy as a self-media outlet revealed the presence of the banned substance Sudan Red IV in various skincare products, raising consumer concerns about safety and brand integrity [1][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A video by "Old Dad Evaluation" detected Sudan Red IV in multiple skincare products, leading to consumer anxiety and brand scrutiny [1][3]. - The source of the contamination was traced to a questionable raw material group containing three components: mudfish extract, neem leaf extract, and moringa seed oil, with a Sudan Red content of 1170 ppm [1][3]. - Over 800 products have been implicated, affecting more than 400 brands, including both international and domestic names [4]. Group 2: Health Impact - Sudan Red IV is classified as a synthetic industrial dye and is listed as a Group 3 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), indicating it is an animal carcinogen but not proven to be carcinogenic to humans [5][6]. - The potential health risks from topical application are considered lower than those from ingestion, but long-term exposure could pose cumulative risks [8][9]. Group 3: Brand Responses - Many brands have issued minimal responses, with some products being removed from online platforms, while others remain available for purchase [9][10]. - Brands like Kiehl's and others emphasize compliance with regulations but have not addressed testing plans for Sudan Red [11][12]. - Consumer dissatisfaction is evident, with reports of difficulties in returning products and receiving adequate responses from customer service [13][14].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant controversy in the cosmetics industry related to the detection of the banned substance Sudan Red IV in various skincare products, raising consumer concerns and prompting investigations into the implicated brands [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A video by "Old Dad Evaluation" revealed the presence of Sudan Red IV in multiple skincare products, leading to widespread consumer anxiety [1][2]. - The source of the contamination was traced to a questionable raw material group containing fish gut extract, neem leaf extract, and moringa seed oil, with a detected concentration of 1170 ppm (1.17 g/kg) of Sudan Red [2][3]. - Over 800 products have been identified as potentially containing the problematic raw material group, affecting more than 400 brands, including both international and domestic names [4]. Group 2: Health Implications - Sudan Red is classified as a synthetic industrial dye and is listed as a Group 3 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), indicating it is an animal carcinogen but not proven to be carcinogenic to humans [6][7]. - The National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) has explicitly banned Sudan Red IV in cosmetics, highlighting the serious regulatory implications of its presence [7][11]. - Experts suggest that while the immediate risk from topical application may be lower than ingestion, long-term exposure could pose cumulative health risks [10][11]. Group 3: Brand Responses and Market Impact - Many implicated brands have responded minimally, with some products being removed from online platforms, while others remain available for purchase [12][14]. - Brands like Kiehl's and others have emphasized compliance with regulations but have not disclosed plans for testing their products for Sudan Red [14][15]. - The controversy has led to consumer confusion and anxiety, with reports of difficulties in obtaining refunds for potentially contaminated products [17][18]. Group 4: Regulatory and Industry Insights - The article highlights the challenges in ensuring product safety, noting that not all banned substances are routinely tested in cosmetics, which raises concerns about consumer safety [14][15]. - The presence of Sudan Red IV in cosmetics underscores the need for stricter oversight and transparency in ingredient sourcing and labeling within the beauty industry [18].