Core Insights - The article discusses the recent controversy surrounding the game "Delta Operation," which has faced backlash from players due to balance adjustments made on October 5, 2023, affecting certain gameplay mechanics and character classes [1][6][27] - The adjustments have led to significant player discussions and a planned boycott on October 10, 2023, indicating a strong emotional response from the community [1][6][27] Player Reactions - Players have expressed mixed feelings about the balance changes, with some believing that the adjustments do not significantly impact core players, while others argue that the changes undermine the game's appeal to casual players [5][12][18] - A notable portion of the player base is considering switching to competing games like "Dark Zone Breakout" and "Battlefield 6" due to dissatisfaction with the recent changes [6][27] Official Response - In response to the backlash, the official team of "Delta Operation" issued an apology and compensation on October 8, 2023, within three days of the initial announcement, indicating a recognition of the issue's severity [6][12][27] - The company is preparing for further communication and adjustments to address player concerns, highlighting the importance of player feedback in game development [6][27] Market Context - The "search and extraction" genre, exemplified by "Delta Operation," is experiencing growth, with other titles in the market also gaining traction, suggesting a competitive landscape [27][28] - The article notes that while "Delta Operation" has contributed to the genre's development, the market is not yet saturated, and new entrants from major companies are expected to intensify competition [27][28] Economic Considerations - The article highlights concerns about in-game economic inflation, which has become more pronounced over time, suggesting that gameplay adjustments alone may not be sufficient to address underlying economic issues [26][27] - Players have called for more consumption outlets for in-game currency to mitigate inflation rather than restricting gameplay options [26][27]

Core Viewpoint - The game "Unbound Abyss," developed by Dreamhaven, faces significant challenges in its long-term operation due to its buyout model and the competitive landscape of the shooting game market [1][2][6]. Pricing and Market Position - "Unbound Abyss" is priced at $30 (approximately 215 RMB), which is lower than mainstream AAA games priced at $60-$70, making it more acceptable in the Western market [2][3]. - The game aims to leverage the "premium trust effect" from its development team, which includes former Blizzard executives, to justify its pricing [3]. Content and Gameplay - The game is a rule-driven multiplayer online competitive game that combines elements like spaceship battles and zero-gravity exploration, differentiating it from traditional military-style games [5][14]. - While initial player experiences may be positive, there is a risk of aesthetic fatigue over time, necessitating ongoing content updates to maintain player engagement [5][6]. Long-term Viability - The buyout model relies heavily on initial sales, and without a stable revenue stream from DLCs or expansions, sustaining long-term content updates may be challenging [6][7]. - The game may need to transition from a buyout model to a free-to-play model with in-game purchases to attract a broader player base [7]. Market Trends and Competition - The competitive landscape for the shooting game genre has evolved rapidly, with many titles exploring various gameplay mechanics and user engagement strategies [8][10]. - Games like "Dark Zone Breakthrough" have adapted by lowering barriers to entry and enhancing cross-platform experiences, indicating a shift in market dynamics [10][12]. Industry Innovations - The emergence of "actionized" gameplay within the shooting genre represents a potential new direction, with various companies exploring this trend [16][19]. - The focus on gameplay innovation rather than just thematic elements is crucial for standing out in a crowded market [15][19].