车辆辅助驾驶功能
Search documents
陈震首次还原劳斯莱斯撞车事件:过于信赖辅助驾驶功能,在驾驶中低头捡拾物品
第一财经· 2025-10-19 02:52
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a traffic accident involving a well-known car reviewer, Chen Zhen, highlighting the implications of using advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and the responsibilities of drivers in such situations [3][4]. Summary by Sections Accident Details - On October 3, 2025, Chen Zhen was involved in a traffic accident while driving a vehicle equipped with L2-level autonomous driving features. He was using the vehicle's ADAS, which was active at the time of the accident. The vehicle accelerated to approximately 80 km/h after the lead vehicle changed lanes, resulting in a collision after running a red light [6][11]. Usage of ADAS - Chen Zhen admitted to infrequently using the luxury vehicle, primarily for the experience of driving a high-end electric car. He did not thoroughly read the vehicle's manual, leading to a lack of understanding of the ADAS capabilities and limitations [7][8]. Changes in Perception of ADAS - Following the accident, Chen Zhen acknowledged the need for drivers to understand the limitations of different ADAS systems. He emphasized that while these systems can reduce traffic risks, drivers remain the ultimate responsible party. He recommended that drivers familiarize themselves with their vehicle's capabilities and avoid using ADAS if they are unsure of its reliability [9][14]. Recommendations for Drivers and Manufacturers - Chen Zhen suggested that drivers should prioritize vehicles with reliable ADAS systems and remain attentive while using such features. He also called for manufacturers to enhance user training and provide clear information about the capabilities and restrictions of their ADAS [9][14].
车评人陈震回应车祸原因:用了辅助驾驶,平时劳斯莱斯开得少
2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao· 2025-10-14 10:45
Core Points - The incident involving the well-known automotive blogger Chen Zhen and his Rolls-Royce Cullinan has garnered significant attention due to the use of assisted driving features [1] - Chen Zhen acknowledged a lack of understanding regarding the boundaries of the assisted driving capabilities, attributing the accident to this misunderstanding [1] - The Beijing traffic police reported that both drivers were not under the influence of drugs or alcohol, and Chen Zhen was found to be fully responsible for the accident [1] Summary by Categories Incident Details - The accident occurred on October 4, and the investigation is ongoing [1] - Chen Zhen confirmed that the vehicle's Event Data Recorder (EDR) data will be used as a reference for the official report [1] Assisted Driving Insights - Chen Zhen emphasized that the differences in assisted driving functions across various vehicle brands are significant [1] - He reiterated that the driver remains the primary responsible party in any situation, regardless of the vehicle's technology [1]