共研网发布的《2026-2032年中国艺术培训市场全景调查与市场全景评估报告》共九章。首先介绍了艺术培训相关概念及发展环境，接着分析了中国艺术培 训规模及消费需求，然后对中国艺术培训市场运行态势进行了重点分析，最后分析了中国艺术培训面临的机遇及发展前景。您若想对中国艺术培训有个系统 的了解或者想投资该行业，本报告将是您不可或缺的重要工具。 本研究报告数据主要采用国家统计数据，海关总署，问卷调查数据，商务部采集数据等数据库。其中宏观经济数据主要来自国家统计局，部分行业统计数据 主要来自国家统计局及市场调研数据，企业数据主要来自于国统计局规模企业统计数据库及证券交易所等，价格数据主要来自于各类市场监测数据库。 第四节研究结论 报告目录 第一章研究概述 第一节研究背景 一、行业背景 二、市场背景 三、政策背景 第二节研究内容 第三节研究方法 一、中国艺术培训行业发展分析 二、高等艺术院校学生数统计 三、艺术院校专业构成分析 四、中国艺术培训行业竞争分析 第三节现阶段艺术培训行业发展动态 一、艺术培训市场发展前景广阔 二、少儿艺术培训市场日渐红火 三、民族艺术培训课程受追捧 四、高考艺术培训市场分析 五、成人艺术培训 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolving landscape of art education in China, highlighting its transition from a valued component of holistic education to a marginalized sector facing significant challenges due to changing societal values and regulatory pressures [1][2][3]. Group 1: Historical Context - In 2015, the Chinese education industry experienced a significant financing boom, marking the beginning of art education being recognized as an industry with structured policies and capital investment [3][4]. - The introduction of policies such as the "Art Quality Assessment Measures" by the Ministry of Education in 2015 integrated art education into the national education governance system, elevating its status [3][4]. - By 2016-2018, the art training industry saw rapid growth, with numerous financing events and the establishment of regulations that allowed for profit-making in art training institutions [6][7]. Group 2: Recent Developments - From 2019 to 2021, the industry experienced a shift towards "non-academic" training, with a focus on quality education and the rise of online platforms during the pandemic [11][12]. - The introduction of the "Double Reduction" policy in 2021 led to a significant decline in academic training institutions, while non-academic training was not subjected to the same level of scrutiny, allowing for a temporary boom in art education [12][13]. - However, by 2022-2023, the industry faced a regulatory tightening, with new guidelines and standards being implemented, leading to a decline in financing and a restructuring of the market [16][18][20]. Group 3: Current Challenges - The art education sector is now characterized by a "white list" governance model, requiring institutions to meet stringent criteria to operate, which has led to the exit of many previously successful entities [22][23]. - The market is experiencing a bifurcation, with high-end institutions dominating and low-end individual teachers thriving, while the mid-tier market is being squeezed out [23][24]. - The overall financing for the education sector has drastically decreased, with art education projects becoming increasingly rare, indicating a significant contraction in the industry [24][25]. Group 4: Societal Perception - Art education is perceived as a non-essential expenditure by many families, leading to a decline in enrollment and investment in this sector [28][29]. - The lack of a clear narrative and recognition of the value of art education contributes to its marginalization, as it struggles to justify its existence in a results-driven educational environment [30][31]. - The article suggests that the decline of art education reflects broader societal attitudes towards "useless" pursuits, questioning the value placed on artistic endeavors in contemporary education [35][36].