Workflow
鱼锅饼子
icon
Search documents
“打包塑料袋10元一个”,吊销营业执照后仍营业,山东蓬莱“宰客”酒楼招牌被强拆
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-02-23 04:15
转自:扬子晚报 山东烟台一家名为 "老蓬莱酒楼" 的饭店,曾在2024年因打包塑料袋10元一个登上热搜,此后关于该酒 楼的投诉仍频繁出现。扬子晚报 / 紫牛新闻曾在1月份报道,该酒楼又被曝出食材疑似变质、价格前后 不一、饮料过期等问题。之后当地反馈,已于1月中旬吊销 "老蓬莱酒楼" 的营业执照。然而,该酒楼仍 在继续营业。2月23日,多位读者告诉紫牛新闻记者,"老蓬莱酒楼" 的招牌已于21日被拆除,店内设备 也被清空。 2月23日,多位读者向记者证实,当地管理部门已拆除该酒楼招牌,并清空店内设备。 山东烟台的这家 "老蓬莱酒楼",2024年曾因打包塑料袋10元一个上过热搜,此后投诉不断。有网友去 年12月发帖称,他们2025年十一黄金周在烟台老蓬莱酒楼就餐时,遇到食材疑似变质、价格前后不一、 饮料过期等问题,向主管部门投诉后未得到有效处理。 网友还发现,店内饮料显示2025年4月过期,事发时已过期半年。他们拿着饮料找老板对质,老板却矢 口否认,声称饮料是顾客自己带来的。 在某团购网站上,烟台 "老蓬莱酒楼" 公示的营业执照名称为 "何氏家常菜馆",食品经营许可证名称则 为 "鑫迪海鲜菜馆"。 记者曾联系该酒楼 ...
三亚一游客称被司机诱导就餐,4道海鲜1868元,职能部门:会积极处理
Huan Qiu Wang Zi Xun· 2026-01-08 06:43
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights consumer complaints regarding overpriced seafood in Sanya, where tourists are allegedly misled by drivers to expensive restaurants, leading to significant financial losses [1][3][12]. Group 1: Consumer Experiences - A tourist family was charged 1930 yuan for four seafood dishes and two coconuts, with the restaurant claiming that such prices are standard in Sanya [1][3]. - The family was misled by a non-operating vehicle driver who changed the destination to a more expensive seafood restaurant, resulting in a 40-minute detour [3]. - The seafood prices at the restaurant were significantly higher than those at local markets, with some items priced over double compared to other establishments [11][12]. Group 2: Regulatory Response - The Sanya Municipal Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau is actively addressing complaints of overcharging in the seafood sector, encouraging consumers to report such incidents [2][17]. - Following consumer complaints, some businesses have refunded unreasonable charges, indicating a response from local authorities to address these issues [12][13]. - The Sanya Market Supervision Administration has initiated discussions with key seafood restaurants to address core issues such as pricing transparency and deceptive practices [17][18]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The article reflects a growing concern over consumer protection in tourist areas, emphasizing the need for stricter regulations to prevent deceptive practices [29][30]. - The ongoing issues with seafood pricing and consumer experiences could negatively impact Sanya's reputation as a tourist destination if not addressed effectively [30].
曾因10元打包袋上热搜的饭店仍在“宰客”?顾客:点螃蟹时称58元/斤,结账变58元/只,食材疑变质;有关部门:正在调查
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2026-01-05 08:15
Core Viewpoint - The "Old Penglai Restaurant" is facing serious complaints regarding food quality, pricing discrepancies, and expired beverages, leading to an investigation by local market regulatory authorities [1][2][6]. Group 1: Complaints and Issues - Customers reported that the restaurant served potentially spoiled crabs, with one instance where crabs were found to be inedible, emitting a foul odor and having a poor texture [6]. - There were discrepancies between the prices listed on the paper menu and the wall menu, with one dish being charged at 128 yuan instead of the advertised 88 yuan per jin [3]. - The restaurant allegedly misrepresented the main ingredient in a dish, claiming it was premium fish but serving a much cheaper frozen fish instead [3][4]. Group 2: Previous Incidents and Investigations - The restaurant had previously been investigated in 2024 for charging 10 yuan for a plastic bag and for including charges for items that were supposed to be complimentary [7][8]. - The local market supervision bureau had previously found the restaurant guilty of price fraud and failing to clearly mark prices, leading to a formal investigation [11]. - The restaurant's management has not provided substantial responses to inquiries regarding the recent complaints, indicating a lack of accountability [2][11].
点单说螃蟹58一斤结账变58一只
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-04 14:56
Core Viewpoint - A restaurant in Yantai, Shandong, named "Old Penglai Restaurant," has faced multiple complaints regarding food quality, pricing discrepancies, and expired beverages, leading to investigations by local regulatory authorities [1] Group 1: Customer Complaints - Customers reported issues with food quality, including suspected spoiled ingredients and discrepancies in menu pricing, such as being charged 128 for a dish advertised as 88 per pound without any weighing done [1] - The restaurant's seafood offerings were criticized for freshness, with specific complaints about the quality of shrimp and crabs served, which were described as spoiled and unfit for consumption [1] Group 2: Regulatory Response - The Penglai Tourism Resort Management Committee stated that market regulatory authorities are currently investigating the complaints, and if found valid, the restaurant will face legal consequences [1] - Local market supervision departments have been contacted for further investigation, indicating that the situation is being taken seriously by local government officials [1]
曾因10元一个打包袋上热搜,烟台老蓬莱酒楼疑再爆宰客事件
Yang Zi Wan Bao Wang· 2026-01-04 10:30
Core Viewpoint - The "Old Penglai Restaurant" in Yantai, Shandong, has faced ongoing complaints regarding food quality, pricing discrepancies, and expired products, leading to investigations by local authorities [1][4][6]. Group 1: Complaints and Issues - Customers reported issues during the 2025 National Day holiday, including suspected spoiled ingredients, inconsistent pricing, and expired beverages [1][6]. - Specific complaints included a price discrepancy for a dish called "fish pot pancake," which was quoted at 88 per jin but charged 128 per serving without weighing it in front of customers [6][7]. - Seafood freshness was questioned, with reports of unfit crabs and shrimp, and expired drinks being served [7][9]. Group 2: Regulatory Response - The local market supervision bureau initiated an investigation into the restaurant following previous complaints about pricing practices, including unmarked prices and potential price fraud [4][6]. - The Penglai Tourism Resort Management Committee acknowledged the situation and stated that the market supervision department is currently gathering evidence for further action [9].