最近打开外卖软件，是不是又被0元奶茶、1元12瓶水的优惠弹窗晃眼了？ 从十年前的1元洗车，到后来的网约车低价、共享单车免费骑，再到现在的外卖大战，互联网公司好像 就认准了撒钱这一招。 2025年这波外卖战到底有多疯？京东外卖靠零佣金+给骑手交五险一金，40天就把日订单做到了一百万 单；阿里紧跟着砸了500亿进来； 美团更狠，直接掏了1000亿扶持餐饮生态，这笔钱算下来，相当于它2024年一整年净利润的2.8倍。 明明十年前就有烧钱烧到崩盘的教训，为啥巨头们还愿意这么干？ 要搞懂这事，得先回头看十年前的千团大战。 2008年美国有个叫Groupon的网站，搞了个一天一团的新模式，上线就火了，7个月就开始赚钱，一年 半估值直接飙到13.5亿美元，成了当时最快突破10亿估值的公司。 国内创业者一看这架势，立马跟着学。 当年的竞争比现在还野蛮。 百度投了糯米，阿里帮着美团，腾讯站了大众点评；初创公司更激进，比如拉手网，到2011年4月就拿 了三轮共1.66亿美元融资，估值冲到11亿，当时人称团购融资之王。 为了抢用户抢地盘，大家疯狂烧钱，请明星代言、铺天盖地打广告，有的公司一年光广告费就花10亿； 个别城市经理为了抢 ...

Core Viewpoint - The intense competition among major internet companies like Meituan, Alibaba, and JD.com in the instant retail sector is leading to unsustainable subsidy wars, which may result in resource wastage and long-term negative impacts on the industry [1][2][4] Group 1: Impact on Consumers - Consumers are experiencing a surge of attractive offers such as "0 yuan milk tea," but this has led to instances of wasted resources, with many orders going unclaimed [1] - The phenomenon of "fake demand" is emerging, where consumer impulsiveness driven by subsidies does not translate into actual consumption [1] Group 2: Impact on Delivery Workers - Delivery workers are facing increased workloads due to the surge in orders, with some reporting delivery counts as high as 80 to 100 orders in a single day, leading to potential health risks [1][2] Group 3: Impact on Small Businesses - Small businesses may benefit from increased traffic due to platform subsidies, but they also bear part of the subsidy costs, leading to situations where order volume increases without corresponding revenue growth [2] - The influx of orders can degrade service quality, negatively affecting consumer perception and long-term brand viability for small businesses [2] Group 4: Impact on Platforms - Platforms are under significant financial pressure due to high subsidy costs, which could lead to short-term profit declines and potential stock price impacts [2] - For instance, Morgan Stanley estimates that Alibaba's investment in related businesses has reached approximately 10 billion yuan, with further increases expected, raising questions about the sustainability of this subsidy model [2] Group 5: Broader Industry Implications - The ongoing subsidy wars are affecting the entire retail ecosystem, with competitors like Pinduoduo and Kuaishou potentially feeling the pressure to join the fray, which could lead to further industry "involution" [3] - The focus on order volume growth over value creation could undermine the long-term benefits for consumers, delivery workers, businesses, and platforms alike [3][4] Group 6: Recommendations for Sustainable Growth - To avoid a detrimental cycle of competition, platforms should prioritize technological innovation and service quality rather than relying solely on price-based strategies [3][4] - Regulatory bodies and industry associations should implement reasonable policies to mitigate the negative effects of excessive competition, ensuring consumer rights and protecting the interests of small businesses and delivery workers [3][4]