Summary of Aspen Aerogels (ASPN) FY Conference Call - August 12, 2025 Company Overview - **Company**: Aspen Aerogels (ASPN) - **Key Speakers**: Don Young (CEO), Ricardo Rodriguez (CFO), Neil Baranowski (Investor Relations) Key Points Financial Performance - Q2 performance was at the higher end of expectations for revenue, gross profit, and adjusted EBITDA [3][4] - Significant modifications to fixed cost structure were made, allowing the company to maintain profitability at lower revenue levels, especially in light of uncertainties in the EV space [3][4] - Outlook for the second half of the year indicates similar revenue to the first half but with double the EBITDA due to cost structure changes [4] Energy Industrial Business - The energy industrial business, which includes thermal management and fire safety systems, has seen a lull after two record-breaking years (2023 and 2024) with average revenues of $30 million per year in subsea projects [5][6] - The business is divided into maintenance (60% of revenue) and project work (40% of revenue) [5][6] - Despite the current lull, the company has a strong reputation and has won 14 out of the last 15 projects awarded in the subsea space [7][8] - Gross margins in this segment have improved from 15-20% to above 35%, with recent quarters in the low 40s [10] - The company expects growth to resume in 2026, targeting long-term growth rates of 10-20% per year [10] Pyrothin Business and GM Relationship - GM remains a key customer, with a 20% increase in volumes quarter-over-quarter in Q1 and Q2 [16] - The company anticipates steady production volumes from GM in Q3 and Q4, despite regulatory changes affecting EV sales [16][19] - The relationship with GM is expected to remain strong, with GM's market share in the EV space at 16-17% [17] - The company has confirmed that GM's recent battery architecture changes do not negatively impact their thermal management solutions [28][29] OEM Partnerships and Future Revenue - The company has potential revenue of approximately $700 million from awarded business, which is expected to be discounted to around $350 million for practical projections [32] - Partnerships with other OEMs like Mercedes, Stellantis, Audi, and Porsche are expected to diversify revenue streams by 2027 [33] - Ford is also seen as a potential customer, with ongoing collaboration on new electric vehicle designs [35] Capital Expenditure and Financial Outlook - The company has shifted to a CapEx-light model, with sustainable CapEx levels projected in the mid-teens ($15-17 million) [12][41] - The relationship with external manufacturing partners is strong, allowing for efficient production and cost management [39][40] - Future EBITDA margins are projected to be around 25% with gross margins above 35% [45] - The company has a net income breakeven point close to $280-290 million in revenue [46] Additional Insights - The company has successfully navigated tariff changes and has a strong balance sheet with over $300 million in net operating losses (NOLs) [45][46] - The management remains optimistic about the recovery of the energy industrial business and the stability of GM's volumes, despite broader market uncertainties [10][19] This summary encapsulates the key insights and financial outlook for Aspen Aerogels as discussed in the conference call, highlighting the company's strategic positioning and future growth potential.

Production Expansion - GM will invest $4 billion to augment current plants to boost US production [1] - This investment will enable GM to assemble over 2 million vehicles annually [1] - The expansion is expected to create 3,000 to 4,000 union jobs [1] - Production of gas-powered Chevy Blazer and Chevy Equinox will increase in the US [1] - Production of some gas-powered full-size SUVs and light duty pickups like the Silverado will move to Michigan [2] Trade and Tariff Impact - The production shift is a response to 25% sector tariffs on autos and USMCA imports [3] - These moves are viewed as a long-term mitigation effort [3] - GM anticipates $4 billion to $5 billion in tariff costs [3]