Core Viewpoint - Consumer staple companies may benefit from higher inflation due to their ability to pass on cost increases to customers, but consumer resistance to price hikes is a concern [2]. Group 1: PepsiCo - PepsiCo's second-quarter revenue increased by 2%, driven entirely by higher prices, which contributed 4 percentage points, while lower volume subtracted about 1.5 percentage points [5]. - Adjusted operating income for PepsiCo fell by 3%, indicating that price hikes were insufficient to offset rising costs [5]. - PepsiCo's share price dropped by 16.9% over the past year, contrasting with a 16.8% gain in the S&P 500 index during the same period [6]. - The price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio for PepsiCo increased from 19 to 26, which is still lower than the S&P 500's P/E of 30, suggesting potential for patient investors [7]. Group 2: Procter & Gamble - Procter & Gamble's fiscal third-quarter adjusted sales grew by only 1%, with higher prices accounting for the entire increase and volumes remaining flat [9]. - In the fourth quarter, adjusted sales increased by 2%, with higher prices and mix each contributing 1 percentage point, while volume remained constant [10]. - Procter & Gamble's stock price decreased by 7.9% over the past year, and its P/E multiple contracted from 28 to less than 25 [10].

Core Viewpoint - Procter & Gamble (P&G) is restructuring its operations due to a slowdown in consumer spending, which includes laying off up to 7,000 workers over the next two years and potentially exiting lower-performing brands [3][4][6] Group 1: Layoffs and Workforce Impact - The layoffs will affect approximately 6.5% of P&G's total workforce, with a disproportionate impact on white-collar jobs, which will see a 15% reduction [5][6] - P&G employs over 30,000 workers in the U.S. and has a global workforce of around 108,000, with 48% of total revenues coming from the U.S. market [4][6] Group 2: Consumer Spending Trends - Consumer spending in the U.S. has slowed, with growth rates dropping from about 4% last year to around 2% this year, and organic sales for North America rising only 1% in the fiscal third quarter [3][4][6] - The CFO noted that consumer consumption has decreased to about 1% in February and March, down from approximately 3% over the past year [6] Group 3: Financial Implications - The restructuring program is estimated to cost between $1 billion and $1.6 billion, aimed at ensuring long-term business viability despite current challenges [6][8] - The company is adjusting its brand portfolio to better align with consumer demand, a strategy it has employed since its founding in 1837 [8]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - For Q3 2025, net sales were $76 million, a decrease of $8 million or 10% from the prior year, primarily due to lower unit sales volume, partially offset by a favorable mix [17] - Gross margin was 20.8%, down from 23.3% in the prior year, attributed to lower cost absorption from production decreases [18] - Adjusted net income for the quarter was $5 million or $0.30 per diluted share, compared to $8.5 million or $0.50 per diluted share in the prior year [18] - Adjusted EBITDA was $7.5 million, down from $11.7 million in the prior year, with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 9.9% compared to 13.9% [19] - The company ended the quarter with nearly $167 million in total liquidity, including $67 million in cash and short-term investments, and $100 million available under its revolving credit facility, with no debt [19] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - In the MasterCraft segment, production of the premium X Star model ramped up, contributing positively to brand momentum and dealer support [14] - The pontoon segment, including Crest and Valise brands, faced challenges with dealer inventories, leading to a 40% year-over-year unit reduction [16] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Dealer inventories across brands decreased by 30% over the past year, and more than 45% compared to the pre-pandemic period in fiscal 2019 [10] - The company anticipates a modest impact from tariffs on fiscal 2025 costs, while closely monitoring broader demand implications [11] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on disciplined cost, cash, and pipeline management, with a renewed emphasis on product development and prudent destocking [9] - Capital allocation priorities remain disciplined, with a solid balance sheet and a focus on share repurchase programs to return capital to shareholders [12] - The company is exploring growth opportunities within its distribution network, particularly in key markets like Dallas and Southern Utah [15] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management acknowledged persistent macroeconomic headwinds and tariff uncertainty impacting the marine sector, leading to a revision of full-year guidance [10] - Despite challenges, management remains confident in achieving inventory reduction targets and maintaining dealer health [10] - The company is optimistic about retail momentum, particularly with premium buyers, and is preparing for the summer selling season [50] Other Important Information - Tim Oxley, the CFO, will retire in June, with Scott Kent set to succeed him [5][6] - The X Star model received the National Marine Manufacturers Association Innovation Award, highlighting the company's focus on quality and innovation [13] Q&A Session Summary Question: Can you quantify the tariff impacts and potential price increases for model year '26? - Management indicated that the impact of tariffs is evolving and has not yet determined specific pricing effects, but expects some inflationary impact [26] Question: How do you view retail trends and dealer health? - Management expects retail to trend closer to a 10% decline and is pleased with the health of dealers, noting no significant dealer failures [27][37] Question: What is the status of the Belize product and its revenue expectations? - The Belize product is in low-rate production, with anticipated net sales around $10 million for fiscal '25, and positive early responses from dealers [41][44] Question: How will you approach pricing in light of tariffs? - The company aims to balance volume, price, and cost, considering a variable pricing model due to tariff variability [62][64]