Core Insights - Treating deadlines as sacred can lead to significant opportunity costs, as it may suppress curiosity and discourage raising concerns, ultimately resulting in greater costs than delays [1][13] - A culture that prioritizes speed over safety can lead to catastrophic outcomes, as seen in various industries including aviation, oil, and automotive [2][3][5] Boeing Case Study - Boeing's rush to compete with Airbus led to the quick certification of the 737 MAX despite engineers' warnings about safety issues, resulting in two crashes and over $20 billion in costs [2] BP Case Study - The Deepwater Horizon oil spill exemplifies a project management failure where pressure to meet deadlines led to ignoring safety warnings, costing BP over $60 billion [3] Volkswagen Case Study - Volkswagen's emissions scandal arose from an unrealistic deadline, leading to the creation of software to cheat emissions tests, resulting in over $30 billion in fines and lost opportunities [5] Samsung Case Study - Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 was rushed to market, leading to recalls and losses estimated at $17 billion due to overheating issues that were not adequately addressed [6] HS2 Project Case Study - The UK's HS2 high-speed rail project saw costs escalate from £30 billion to over £80 billion due to ignoring internal warnings about unrealistic budgets, resulting in wasted resources [7] Berlin Airport Case Study - The Berlin Brandenburg Airport project faced delays and cost overruns from €2.8 billion to over €6.5 billion due to a rush to meet deadlines, highlighting the importance of addressing concerns early [8] Lockheed Case Study - Lockheed's F-35 program suffered from a strategy that prioritized speed, leading to hundreds of billions in costs due to retrofitting aircraft built before testing was complete [9] Sydney Opera House Case Study - The Sydney Opera House project experienced significant cost overruns from A$7 million to over A$100 million due to rushed decisions and scope changes, emphasizing the need for careful planning [10] Positive Examples of Delaying Deadlines - Companies like Apple, Toyota, and Johnson & Johnson have demonstrated that delaying launches to address issues can protect reputation and save money, showcasing the value of prioritizing quality over speed [12]

What do hoverboards start doing. They start exploding, which is where Andy comes into the story. Do you do you remember any of the like early versions of this story. I remember being very like, you know, panic panicked like this is a problem.Uh because yes, they started exploding. They were catching on fire. There was some deaths I think associated with it.Like it was it was bad. Yeah. And it's it's useful to remember that these things are huge.Yeah. which is like it's not like if your even your phone batte ...

" 自研基带芯片描绘的是经营策略，苹果的故事还是AI。 " 作者丨刘伊伦 编辑丨包永刚 "从最低端的产品开始上才比较稳妥， 其他的系列要是有问题造成的影响太大了。"关于苹果最新发布的 iPhone 16e搭载了自研的调制解调器C1所引起的质疑，通信行业资深从业者赵阳这样告诉雷峰网。 调制解调器是实现手机与外部网络连接和数据传输的关键部件，作为一款风险很高的产品，如果不能正常 工作， 客户将遭遇掉线和错过通知的情况， 苹果售价超过1000美元的高端机型是无法容忍这种情况出现 的。 事实上，不把新部件放在自己的拳头产品上已经是手机大厂的惯用策略，半导体行业投资人奕明告诉雷峰 网："这其中的风险，可以参考三星Galaxy Note 7手机电池存在很大隐患引发的召回事件。" 外界对C1的产品力生出质疑其实也不难理解，毕竟从2019年收购英特尔的调制解调器业务到推出C1，苹 果花了6年时间。通信基站工程师苏瑶表示， 苹果推出C1的时间还是晚了 ，错过了5G发展带来的窗口 期，应该22年左右就推出。 而从推出到走向成熟，C系列还要闯过多少关？砸了这么多资源，苹果又为何非得撞这堵南墙？ 关于更多 大厂的芯片动向，欢迎添加作 ...