Core Viewpoint - Nvidia's latest generation of graphics cards, particularly the RTX 5060, is underwhelming in performance and specifications, resembling older models like the RTX 5050 rather than meeting the expectations for a 60 series product [1][3][5]. Group 1: Product Specifications - The RTX 5060 has a core configuration and memory bandwidth that aligns more closely with the RTX 5050, indicating a significant downgrade in expected performance for a 60 series card [5][10]. - Historical data shows that the core count for the RTX 5060 is only 18% of the flagship model, which is significantly lower than the average for 60 series GPUs, which typically range around 36% [10][12]. - The RTX 5060's specifications are comparable to older models like the GTX 750 and GTX 1050, suggesting a regression in performance standards for the 50 series [10][12]. Group 2: Pricing and Value - The pricing strategy for the RTX 5060 reflects a trend where Nvidia is charging higher prices for lower-performing products, with the RTX 5060 priced at 15% of the flagship GPU, which is a deviation from historical pricing norms [18][21]. - The RTX 5060 is positioned as the second cheapest 60 series model in seven generations, yet it offers performance that is more akin to a 50 series card, leading to perceptions of value erosion among consumers [21][35]. - The increase in production costs has not been matched by corresponding improvements in GPU specifications, leading to higher prices for lower performance [52][57]. Group 3: VRAM and Memory Bandwidth - The RTX 5060 features only 8GB of VRAM, which is 25% of the flagship model's capacity, falling short of historical averages where 60 series GPUs typically offered around 41% of the flagship's VRAM [32][31]. - The memory bandwidth for the RTX 5060 is significantly lower than that of previous generations, indicating a trend of reduced performance capabilities in newer models [23][27]. - The overall trend shows that Nvidia's GPUs are not keeping pace with the memory requirements of modern gaming, particularly when compared to the specifications of contemporary gaming consoles [48][40]. Group 4: Market Dynamics and Competition - Nvidia's strategy appears to be driven by a desire to maximize profits from AI GPU sales, leading to a compromise in the quality and performance of gaming GPUs [51][57]. - The lack of meaningful competition in the GPU market has allowed Nvidia to maintain high profit margins while passing increased production costs onto consumers [57][58]. - The introduction of AMD's Radeon RX 9000 series may begin to exert pricing pressure on Nvidia, potentially benefiting consumers in the gaming GPU market [58].

公众号记得加星标⭐️，第一时间看推送不会错过。 来源：内容 综合自 tomshardware 。 此前一位美国国会议员宣布了一项法案，要求高性能人工智能处理器生产商对其产品进行地理追踪， 以限制中国等未经授权的外国行为者对其产品的使用。阿肯色州参议员汤姆·科顿（Tom Cotton）随 后在本周晚些时候提出了一项立法措施。该法案涵盖的硬件远不止人工智能处理器，并将赋予商务部 长核实硬件位置的权力，并对商业公司实施强制性的位置管控。更复杂的是，高性能显卡也必须具备 地理追踪功能。 如果该法案获得立法者支持，将授权商务部和国防部联合进行一项为期一年的研究，以确定未来可能 采取的额外保护措施。除初步研究外，这两个部门还必须在法案颁布后连续三年进行年度评估。这些 评估必须评估适用于出口管制产品的最新安全技术进展。基于这些评估，两部门可以决定是否应实施 新的要求。 https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/u-s-inks-bill-to-force-geo-tracking-tech-for-gpus-and-servers-high-end-gaming-gpu ...