Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the Haobo GT vehicle highlights the limitations of L2 level driver assistance systems, particularly in recognizing irregularly shaped obstacles and the failure of the Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) system to activate during a collision [1][2][3] Group 1: Incident Details - A video showing a Haobo GT vehicle colliding with a stationary construction vehicle while using Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) has drawn public attention [1] - The vehicle involved is a 2023 model of Haobo GT 560, which is equipped with an L2 level driver assistance system that lacks lidar and uses a single monocular camera for front perception [1] - The vehicle was traveling at a speed exceeding 80 km/h at the time of the collision, surpassing the speed limit for AEB activation [2] Group 2: System Limitations - The user manual for Haobo vehicles specifies that the system may not function properly under certain conditions, such as when encountering irregularly shaped vehicles or when using ACC with stationary or low-speed vehicles [2] - The AEB system's limitations have been a topic of debate, with various manufacturers facing similar issues regarding the activation speed and response to obstacles [3] - Current AEB systems primarily focus on longitudinal braking and have limited capabilities in recognizing static objects, which raises concerns about their effectiveness in emergency situations [3] Group 3: Regulatory Developments - The recent draft regulations from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology aim to clarify safety requirements for L2 driver assistance systems, including the use of AEB and lane-keeping functions [3][4] - The new standards emphasize the need for driver assistance systems to effectively respond to foreseeable misuse by drivers and to provide continuous alerts regarding following distances [4] - The upcoming 2025 model of Haobo GT will include configurations with lidar, indicating a shift towards improved obstacle detection capabilities [4]

Core Viewpoint - The recent incident involving a Haobo GT vehicle using ACC (Adaptive Cruise Control) has raised significant concerns regarding the safety and limitations of L2 level driver assistance systems, particularly in emergency braking scenarios [1][2][3] Group 1: Incident Details - A video showing a Haobo GT colliding with a stationary construction vehicle while using ACC has become a focal point of public discussion [1] - The vehicle involved was a 2023 Haobo GT 560 rear-drive model, equipped with an L2 level driver assistance system that lacks lidar and uses a single monocular camera for front perception [1] - The manufacturer stated that the vehicle is designed to assist drivers but is not intended for full autonomous driving, emphasizing the need for manual control in certain situations [1][2] Group 2: System Limitations - The user manual for Haobo vehicles explicitly warns that the system's pre-warning and braking functions may not operate correctly under specific conditions, such as irregularly shaped vehicles or when using ACC with stationary or low-speed vehicles [2] - The incident highlighted that the AEB (Autonomous Emergency Braking) system did not activate during the collision, with the vehicle traveling at speeds exceeding 80 km/h, surpassing the AEB activation speed limit [2] Group 3: Industry Context - The limitations of AEB systems have been a topic of ongoing debate since the widespread adoption of L2 driver assistance systems, with various manufacturers facing similar challenges regarding AEB activation speeds and object recognition capabilities [3] - Recent regulatory developments, such as the draft safety requirements for intelligent connected vehicles released by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, aim to clarify the usage guidelines for L2 driver assistance systems, including AEB functions [3][4] - The new standards emphasize the need for driver assistance systems to effectively respond to foreseeable misuse by drivers and to provide continuous feedback on following distances while in operation [4]