国冶炼炉卡死六代机！17种稀土全面管控，白宫砸千亿难破技术铁幕 这两天 美国五角大楼估计睡不着觉了！不是因为什么通胀 也不是因为什么选举 而是----中国又干了票大的！ 17种稀土全面管控！国产冶炼炉直接卡死美军六代机项目！白宫砸下千亿美金 到头来发现----技术铁幕这玩意儿 还真不是钱能砸开的 你不是说要围堵中国吗？那我们就让你尝尝什么叫"无米之炊"！ 核心爆料来了！ 数据摆在这里 你们自己看：全球稀土产量 中国占60%以上！精炼供应量？直接90%以上！你美国F-35一架飞机要用417公斤稀土材料 现在问题来了----这 些稀土谁给你提供？ 更狠的是什么？中国《稀土管理条例》一出台 钐 钆 铽 镝 镥 钪 钇这7种中重稀土直接实施出口管制！你想要？先排队申请许可证！用途审查还得一项一 项过！ 美军现役153种主战装备 87%的供应链都得经过中国稀土加工环节！这不是开玩笑 这是实打实的数据！洛马公司的F-35？37%的关键材料得从中国拿！ 你说气不气人？ 对手反应：真的绷不住了 美国防部这两天连夜开会开到凌晨 五角大楼的灯就没熄过！《华尔街日报》头版直接刷屏："中国稀土管制重创美军装备生产线" 洛克希德马丁的 ...

Group 1 - The core point of the article is the passage of the "Big and Beautiful Act," which significantly increases U.S. military spending to $1 trillion, raising questions about its effectiveness in revitalizing the military [1][3][5] - The act was passed with a narrow margin in both the Senate and House, reflecting significant controversy and debate surrounding its implications for military funding and strategy [3][5][6] - The act allocates $156.2 billion specifically for new military projects, with a total military budget approaching $960 billion for the upcoming fiscal year [5][6][7] Group 2 - The funding breakdown includes $70 billion for improving military personnel quality of life, $29.1 billion for shipbuilding, and $24 billion for missile defense systems, among other allocations [7][8] - The military's current procurement strategy is under scrutiny, as the number of weapons being purchased is decreasing despite rising budgets, indicating potential inefficiencies [6][22] - The article highlights a shift in military strategy under the Trump administration, moving away from previous policies and focusing on more pragmatic military projects [19][21][22] Group 3 - The article discusses China's naval advancements, particularly the recent dual aircraft carrier exercises, marking a significant development in naval capabilities and strategy [23][24][27] - The performance of China's aircraft carriers, particularly in terms of sortie rates, is compared favorably to U.S. naval operations, indicating a shift in naval power dynamics [29][30][34] - The article emphasizes the importance of these developments in the context of U.S.-China military competition, suggesting that the era of U.S. naval dominance is being challenged [41][42]