Workflow
The Daily
icon
Search documents
纽约的科技和媒体公司,和我们有哪些不一样?
虎嗅APP· 2025-12-11 13:57
Core Insights - The article discusses the contrasting media and technology ecosystems in the United States and China, highlighting the supportive environment for content creators in the U.S. compared to the restrictive nature in China [8][9][10]. Group 1: Media Ecosystem - The U.S. has a content creator-friendly ecosystem, exemplified by platforms like Substack, which allows creators to retain 90% of their subscription revenue [8]. - In contrast, Chinese platforms often impose restrictive payment terms on creators, leading to a less favorable environment for content production [9]. - The New York Times' team operates with a focus on content creation without the pressure of revenue concerns, showcasing a different operational model compared to Chinese media [13][20]. Group 2: Creator Support and Engagement - U.S. media companies maintain strong relationships with creators, allowing for collaboration even when creators move to larger platforms [10]. - The N+1 publisher, despite having a small subscriber base, thrives on donations and focuses on nurturing new creators, demonstrating a commitment to quality over quantity [11]. - High renewal rates for subscriptions, such as 80% for some Substack creators, indicate a strong willingness among U.S. audiences to pay for quality content [10]. Group 3: Work Culture and Environment - Companies like Google provide exceptional employee benefits, contributing to a relaxed work culture, with employees typically working from 11 AM to 6 PM [18][19]. - Amazon, while more demanding, still offers a relatively comfortable work environment compared to Chinese standards [20]. - The overall atmosphere in U.S. companies appears more relaxed, which may foster innovation, contrasting with the more intense work culture in China [21]. Group 4: Podcasting Landscape - The podcasting industry in the U.S. has evolved into a mainstream medium, with a clear distinction between high-profile and niche shows, leading to a "middle collapse" phenomenon where mid-tier shows struggle for attention [22]. - U.S. podcasters can afford to take their time in developing content, focusing on quality rather than immediate commercial success, unlike the more frantic pace in China [24][25]. - The article emphasizes the importance of seizing early opportunities in emerging media, suggesting that the current podcasting landscape in China is still in its infancy [26][28].
为什么罗永浩也没有把视频播客带火?
3 6 Ke· 2025-12-10 11:14
Core Viewpoint - The entry of prominent figures like Luo Yonghao into the video podcasting space in China was expected to ignite interest in a previously lukewarm market, but the anticipated surge in popularity has not materialized, highlighting the challenges faced by this format in the Chinese digital landscape [1][3]. Group 1: Content Consumption Trends - Domestic internet users have shifted towards short content, favoring efficiency and instant gratification, which makes the long-form nature of video podcasts less appealing [5][6]. - The algorithms of Chinese content platforms prioritize completion rates and initial engagement, disadvantaging longer formats that struggle to capture attention within the critical first few seconds [6][12]. - The phenomenon of short video clips from longer podcasts gaining traction on platforms like Douyin and Xiaohongshu exacerbates the preference for fragmented content over full-length videos [7][12]. Group 2: Cultural and Infrastructure Differences - In contrast to the U.S., where there is a robust market for long-form content and a culture of serious reading, Chinese users are more accustomed to consuming content in short bursts, often on mobile devices [8][13]. - The lack of a platform equivalent to YouTube in China limits the potential for video podcasts, as existing platforms focus on short, easily consumable content rather than accommodating long-form discussions [10][12]. - The fragmented nature of mobile internet usage in China creates an environment where lengthy video podcasts struggle to find a suitable audience [13]. Group 3: Production and Commercial Viability - Producing high-quality video podcasts requires significant investment in equipment, editing, and guest coordination, making it a high-risk venture in the Chinese market [14][15]. - The monetization mechanisms for long-form content in China are not as developed as those in the U.S., where platforms like YouTube provide substantial revenue opportunities through ad placements [15][16]. - The reliance on traditional advertising methods for monetization in China limits the scalability and efficiency of video podcasts, making it difficult for creators to sustain their projects [15][16]. Group 4: Future Outlook - Video podcasts in China are unlikely to achieve the same level of mainstream popularity as in the U.S., but they may find a niche audience among those seeking deeper engagement and connection [18]. - The format is expected to remain a luxury for a select group of creators who prioritize building a strong personal brand and cultivating a loyal audience over immediate financial returns [18].