I mean, it also gets to the macro question. H how much tougher is it for you to pull off this turnaround right now given what's happening in the macroeconomic environment. >> Yeah.I here's what I always say to the our team. Uh I think if we get caught up in the noise, I I I think that becomes a distraction. And so trying to keep uh our team here really focus in on what we can control.And what we can control is being focused on sport and the athlete and then making certain we're bringing the most beautiful c ...

Core Viewpoint - Lululemon Athletica Inc. is experiencing significant changes in its e-commerce operations due to regulatory shifts, impacting its financial outlook and stock valuation [1][2]. Group 1: Financial Impact - TD Cowen has reduced its price target for Lululemon from $298 to $220 while maintaining a Buy rating, influenced by the company's reliance on Canadian e-commerce orders [1]. - Approximately 66% of Lululemon's e-commerce orders in the U.S. were fulfilled via Canada, which previously provided a financial advantage through the de minimis loophole [1][2]. - This reliance on Canadian fulfillment contributed an estimated 250 basis points of unsustainable annual benefit to Lululemon's gross margin [2]. Group 2: Company Overview - Lululemon Athletica Inc., founded in 1998, specializes in designing, developing, and distributing a range of sportswear, accessories, and footwear [3].

Group 1 - BASF SE has entered into a long-term agreement with Equinor to secure up to 23 terawatt hours (TWh) of natural gas annually over a 10-year period starting from October 1, 2025 [1][8] - The agreement supports BASF's energy and raw material portfolio diversification and aims to reduce its carbon footprint, with Equinor's gas supply being noted for its low emissions [2][8] - The partnership builds on a history of collaboration between BASF and Equinor, providing competitive terms that align with BASF's sustainability targets [3][4] Group 2 - The deal solidifies Equinor's role as a key energy provider to BASF, enhancing its strategic position through low-carbon energy infrastructure [4] - BASF's stock has gained 4.2% over the past year, contrasting with a 15.3% decline in the industry [6] - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for BASF's earnings is not provided, but comparisons with other companies in the Basic Materials space indicate a competitive landscape [7][9][10]

Group 1: PVH - PVH specializes in designing and marketing branded dress shirts, neckwear, sportswear, jeanswear, intimate apparel, swim products, footwear, handbags, and related products [1] - PVH has a Zacks Rank of 1 (Strong Buy) and has seen the Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings increase by 8.3% over the last 60 days [1] - The company has a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 6.66, significantly lower than the industry average of 14.30, and possesses a Value Score of A [2] Group 2: Popular - Popular offers a comprehensive suite of banking and financial services, including retail and commercial banking, auto and equipment leasing and financing, mortgage loans, insurance, investment banking, and broker-dealer services [3] - Popular has a Zacks Rank of 1 and has experienced a 4.8% increase in the Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings over the last 60 days [3] - The company has a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 9.82, which is lower than the industry average of 10.70, and also possesses a Value Score of A [4] Group 3: Maximus - Maximus operates government health and human services programs globally [4] - The company holds a Zacks Rank of 1 and has seen the Zacks Consensus Estimate for its current year earnings increase by 6.7% over the last 60 days [4] - Maximus has a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 11.18, compared to the industry average of 18.00, and has a Value Score of A [4]

Core Insights - The rivalry between NIKE Inc. and adidas AG is a significant aspect of the global athletic apparel and footwear market, with both companies competing in various metrics such as revenue growth, brand equity, and sustainability [1][2][3] Investment Case for NIKE (NKE) - NIKE is the leader in the global athletic footwear and apparel market, supported by strong brand equity and a dominant distribution network [4] - The company is implementing a "Win Now" strategy to address near-term challenges and stabilize performance, aiming for stronger growth in fiscal 2026 [5] - NIKE is focusing on its core identity in sports, accelerating product development, and enhancing brand perception through strategic marketing [6][8] - Innovation is central to NIKE's strategy, with new development models allowing for quicker responses to consumer trends [7] Investment Case for adidas (ADDYY) - adidas is undergoing a strategic turnaround under new leadership, focusing on revitalizing brand presence and improving execution [9] - The company is addressing operational challenges by cleaning up excess inventory and narrowing its product focus [10] - adidas emphasizes innovation and product credibility, with recent successful launches indicating a return of brand momentum [11][12] - Financially, adidas is setting the stage for sustainable growth and margin expansion from 2025 onward [13][14] Financial Estimates Comparison - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for NIKE's fiscal 2025 sales and EPS indicates declines of 10.7% and 45.6%, respectively [15] - In contrast, adidas's estimates suggest year-over-year growth of 12.3% in sales and 83% in EPS [16] Price Performance & Valuation - Year-to-date, adidas stock has outperformed NIKE, with a total return of 2.2% compared to NIKE's decline of 18.5% [19] - NIKE trades at a forward price-to-sales multiple of 2.02X, while adidas trades at 1.49X, indicating that adidas may be undervalued relative to its potential [23][26] Conclusion - The near-term outlook appears more favorable for adidas, which is showing signs of a focused turnaround, while NIKE is recalibrating its strategy [27][28]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The fourth quarter revenue decreased by 11% to $1.2 billion, slightly better than the expected 10% decline for the full year [39][47] - Full year revenue declined by 9% to $5.2 billion, with North American revenue down 11% and EMEA flat [47][49] - Gross margin for the fourth quarter increased by 170 basis points year over year to 46.7%, driven by lower product and freight costs [44][47] - Full year gross margin increased by 180 basis points to 47.9%, surpassing expectations [47][49] - The company reported a diluted loss per share of $0.16 for the fourth quarter, while adjusted diluted loss per share was $0.08 [46][49] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Apparel revenue decreased by 11%, while footwear revenue declined by 17% [43] - Accessories business saw a 2% increase, benefiting from strength in team sports and running [43] - Direct to consumer revenue was down 15%, primarily due to a 27% decrease in e-commerce sales [42] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - North American revenue declined by 11%, primarily due to a decrease in the DTC business [39] - EMEA revenue decreased by 2%, remaining flat on a currency-neutral basis [40] - APAC revenue was down 27%, attributed to a highly competitive and promotional environment [40] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focusing on higher quality revenue and brand strength while driving gross margin expansion [49][50] - A shift towards a category management operating model aims to enhance efficiency and decision-making speed [13] - The company is committed to reducing promotional activities to build a more premium brand image [39][42] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in navigating the evolving business environment and emphasized the importance of agility [6][37] - The company anticipates a modest top-line contraction for fiscal 2026 due to recent changes in trade policy [49][50] - Management highlighted the need for a disciplined approach to cost management while maintaining marketing investments [79] Other Important Information - The company has recognized $32 million in restructuring charges for the fourth quarter, with total charges expected to be between $140 million and $160 million [45][49] - Inventory was down 1% year over year to $946 million, aligning with expectations [46] Q&A Session Summary Question: Can you provide more details about the North American reset? - Management highlighted the importance of leadership and a structured approach to improve brand execution and consumer engagement [56][60] Question: How is the company planning to normalize e-commerce with reduced promotional activities? - Management noted positive traction in full-price sales and emphasized the need for a brand-inspired online experience [72][74] Question: What are the expected savings from the restructuring plan? - Management indicated that approximately $35 million in savings were achieved in fiscal 2025, with expectations of $75 million in annual run rate savings by the end of fiscal 2026 [78][79]