Core Viewpoint - The article discusses workplace dynamics, particularly focusing on the issue of employees not being productive during work hours while still being present in the office, leading to unnecessary overtime and inefficiency [2][3][5]. Group 1: Workplace Efficiency - The article emphasizes the importance of completing daily tasks efficiently to avoid unnecessary overtime, suggesting that employees should manage their time better and not waste resources like electricity and air conditioning [3][5]. - It highlights a specific incident where an employee was seen shopping online during work hours, raising concerns about their productivity and commitment to work [3][5]. - The narrative suggests that some employees may pretend to work hard by staying late, while their actual productivity is low, which is a common issue in many workplaces [4][5]. Group 2: Employee Accountability - The article calls for employees to improve their work efficiency and complete their tasks on time, implying that those who do not may be wasting company resources [5]. - It points out the contradiction of employees who are not visible during the day but are present late at night, questioning their actual work ethic [4][5]. - The discussion includes a suggestion for employees to communicate urgent matters before leaving work, reinforcing the idea that responsibilities should be managed during working hours [3][5].

转自：吐槽星君 相亲对象劝我放弃丁克？ （vi a .@不认识你家哥哥很正常 ） 1111111111111 不太了解我,对我存在误解 星期四 23:08 你撤回了一条消息 星期四 23:09 入奶茶留给你自己喝吧 我们不合适 你别再给我发消息了 121年号:2281297 不多相互了解怎么知道不合适, 我认为我们还是缺乏沟通了 可能没告诉你我是丁克 ℃ 评论区姐妹支的招，说是丁克能有效劝退 你家的爵位没人继承可不行 日 HOTT 90.10 生 H L L . 40 不要小孩啊?但是我认为没有孩 子的爱情关系是不稳定的,我接 受不了 c 组建家庭难道不是为了 下一代吗? 星期四 23:57 随着年龄的增长,这些思想都会 变的,你也说不准的。还有,我 妈喜欢家里人多热闹,孩子交给 我妈就行,不用担心这些事 昨天 11:53 上中午好,有没有按时吃饭 昨天 13:38 说实话你的态度挺让人寒心的, 连一个让人沟通的机会都不给 我说我是丁克 你家孩子飞不出来 昨天 13:49 现在是你才工作没多久,不知道 有一个精神寄托的重要性 昨天 13:57 那我们可以先不说这个属 【的】【不】一 . 208190732 好 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government is actively promoting consumption through a series of financial measures, including the issuance of special bonds to support the "old for new" consumption policy, aiming to boost retail sales and overall economic activity [1]. Group 1: Financial Measures - The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) announced that the third batch of 690 billion yuan in special long-term bonds for supporting the "old for new" consumption initiative has been fully allocated, with a fourth batch of the same amount planned for October, completing the annual target of 3000 billion yuan [1]. - The NDRC will collaborate with the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Commerce to ensure local governments fulfill their funding responsibilities and detail the usage plans for these funds [1]. Group 2: Market Impact - In the first half of the year, the "old for new" consumption initiative has shown positive results, with sales of automobiles, home appliances, home decoration, and mobile phones reaching 1.6 trillion yuan [1]. - Retail sales of major household appliances and audio-visual equipment, cultural and office supplies, communication equipment, and furniture have seen year-on-year growth rates of 30.7%, 25.4%, 24.1%, and 22.9% respectively, contributing to a 5% year-on-year increase in total retail sales of consumer goods, which is 1.5 percentage points higher than the previous year's total [1].

Core Viewpoint - The incident at Sketch.dev highlights the hidden risks associated with AI-generated code, where seemingly correct code can introduce significant bugs due to subtle changes during code refactoring [4][5][16]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Sketch.dev experienced a series of mini outages starting on July 15, attributed to CPU spikes and slow system responses [6][7]. - The initial investigation revealed that the outages coincided with the CEO logging into the system, leading to the temporary suspension of the CEO's account [3][9]. - Further analysis traced the root cause to a logic error introduced during a large-scale code refactoring, which involved AI-generated code [13][16]. Group 2: Technical Analysis - The problematic code was a result of moving code from one file to another, where a critical change from "break" to "continue" led to an infinite loop [15][16]. - The incident exposed the inadequacies of current tools in detecting minor code changes, particularly when large modifications obscure small but significant errors [16][18]. - AI-generated code is more prone to such errors due to its method of rewriting rather than directly copying and pasting, which increases the likelihood of transcription mistakes [18][22]. Group 3: Preventive Measures - To mitigate future risks, Sketch.dev has implemented a "clipboard" feature that allows the AI to copy and paste code, aiming to preserve the original logic [23]. - The team plans to integrate more advanced code formatting tools to ensure proper indentation and structure when pasting code [23][24]. - There is a call for Git to enhance its capabilities in detecting cross-file changes, which would significantly improve error detection in AI-generated code [24]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The incident at Sketch.dev is not isolated, as other developers have reported similar issues with AI tools leading to significant operational failures [25][28]. - A recent survey indicated that 66% of developers frequently encounter AI-generated code that is almost correct, leading to increased debugging time [35][36]. - Trust in AI tools remains low, with only 3% of developers expressing high confidence in their reliability, while 46% explicitly distrust them [37][39].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the intense competition for AI talent, exemplified by the case of Matt Deitke, who received a staggering $250 million offer from Meta after initially rejecting a $125 million contract. This reflects a broader trend where tech giants are willing to pay astronomical salaries to attract top AI researchers, akin to the sports industry [2][26][29]. Group 1: The AI Talent Market - The AI talent market is likened to the NBA, with young researchers negotiating contracts worth hundreds of millions, showcasing the high demand for AI expertise [2][29]. - Companies like Meta, OpenAI, and Google are offering salaries without any cap, leading to fierce competition for AI professionals [29][30]. - The recruitment of AI experts has become a hot topic on social media, similar to discussions around sports star transfers [29][30]. Group 2: Matt Deitke's Case - Matt Deitke, a 24-year-old AI researcher, initially rejected a $125 million offer from Meta, as he was focused on his startup, Vercept, which had secured $16.5 million in funding [3][5][6]. - After a personal approach from Mark Zuckerberg and a revised offer of $250 million, including $100 million in the first year, Deitke accepted the position [10][12]. - Deitke's journey from a PhD student to a highly sought-after AI talent illustrates the rapid changes in the tech landscape and the opportunities available to young professionals [19][21][26]. Group 3: Industry Dynamics - The competition for AI talent has escalated since the release of ChatGPT in 2022, significantly increasing the bargaining power of AI researchers [44][45]. - The scarcity of qualified AI professionals, due to the unique skill set required, has driven salaries from millions to hundreds of millions [48][45]. - Companies are not only competing on salary but also on resources, with Meta offering access to thousands of GPUs, which is highly valued in AI research [51][52]. Group 4: Challenges for Meta - Despite aggressive recruitment efforts, Meta faces challenges in attracting top talent due to unclear strategic direction and criticism of its AI models [61][64]. - The company has struggled to convert its substantial investments into tangible results, raising concerns about its ability to retain and utilize the talent it recruits [65][66]. - The competitive landscape is further complicated by the strong appeal of companies like OpenAI and Anthropic, which have clearer missions and funding [63][66].

转自：喵大白话 是我没想到的 结果是小鳄鱼爱洗澡 老公：喂我花生！喂我花生！ 这是我见过最离谱的演唱会门票 所以你的意思是 我花四千给自己找个班上 别人看完走了 我给自己整个安可 神经！ 害我莫名其妙笑一下！ 热评给我笑得想鼠 到底是谁的错 退役了可以去摆摊 城管搁后头追都不妨碍你出餐 和你有什么关系 她又没说讨厌你 我一般这样是因为发现忘用优惠券了 这怎么能叫懒，叫审时度势！ 打车看到司机师傅群名.... 网友的撞衫怎么都奇奇怪怪的 哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈 买了一个南瓜热狗卷 抬头一看跟我妈穿的 样 ७ 公众号·喵大白话 我妈和苞米撞衫 © 公众号 · 喵大白话 是好闺蜜的程度( ७ 公众号·喵大白话 高中时候, 我和路边的狗 %公众号·喵大白话 和小孩哥撞款了 (0): 6 公众号 · 喵大白话 完全融入其中了是 Holly & Brommer 7 ✪ 公众号 · 喵大白话 和电线杆 0 01 % 公众号 · 喵大白话 在阿勒泰遇见一只撞衫的猫 B IL FED 4 & 公众号 · 喵大白话 是我本人.... 不是随便一个中国人 做的东西就叫中华美食 网友去宠物店选猫 但是..... 好好的米粉硬是做成了冰粉 ...

Core Viewpoint - Lovense, a Singapore-based adult toy manufacturer with over 20 million users globally, is facing significant security vulnerabilities that allow unauthorized access to user accounts and personal information [1][2]. Group 1: Security Vulnerabilities - A security researcher named BobHacker discovered two critical vulnerabilities in Lovense's system, which were publicly disclosed after the company requested an unusually long 14-month period for fixes [2][7]. - The first vulnerability allows users' real email addresses to be exposed through network analysis tools, as Lovense associates usernames with email addresses, making it easy for others to identify users [4][6]. - The second vulnerability enables attackers to take over Lovense accounts by creating authentication tokens without needing passwords, allowing remote control of connected sex toys, posing potential real-world harm [5][6]. Group 2: Company Response and Timeline - Lovense has acknowledged the issue with the account takeover vulnerability and claims it has been fixed, while the email leakage vulnerability is still under repair, with an update expected to be released soon [7]. - The company has not clarified why it initially estimated a 14-month timeline for fixing the vulnerabilities, which has raised concerns among security researchers [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses humorous and relatable observations about daily life, pets, and human behaviors, emphasizing the light-hearted nature of these experiences. Group 1 - The article features various humorous anecdotes about pets, particularly cats, and their interactions with humans, highlighting the affection and quirks of pet ownership [4][19][50]. - It includes playful commentary on food experiences, such as the enjoyment of frozen egg tarts, showcasing the joy found in simple pleasures [24]. - The text reflects on the absurdity of human behaviors and societal norms, using humor to critique and entertain [63][65]. Group 2 - The article presents a series of light-hearted observations about human life, such as the peculiarities of daily routines and the amusing aspects of social interactions [11][72]. - It captures the essence of human emotions and experiences, often through a comedic lens, making it relatable to a wide audience [45][58]. - The content encourages readers to find humor in everyday situations, promoting a positive outlook on life [19][64].

Core Viewpoint - The WeChat HarmonyOS version has launched a new beta version with several new features aimed at enhancing user experience and functionality on Huawei devices [1][4][7]. Group 1: New Features - The new version allows users to view their Moments album in the "Me" interface [1]. - Users can now change their Moments cover and set visibility time ranges for their posts [4]. - Long images in Moments can be viewed by scrolling up and down [4]. - Users can search for emojis when sending them [4]. - Videos now support mute playback [4]. - The system desktop allows long-pressing WeChat for quick access to scan and payment functions [4]. - Several known issues have been fixed in this update [4]. Group 2: User Adoption and Functionality - Since its launch in January, the WeChat HarmonyOS version has been downloaded over 10 million times [7]. - WeChat Pay has officially integrated with HarmonyOS 5 cash register, allowing users to use WeChat Pay for digital goods purchases on HarmonyOS 5 devices [7]. - The latest beta version supports pop-up window replies on Huawei phones, a feature not mentioned in the upgrade notes [9].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the case of Ollie Holman, a 21-year-old university student in the UK, who developed and sold phishing toolkits that facilitated global online fraud, resulting in over £100 million (approximately 950 million RMB) in losses for victims [1][6]. Group 1: Background and Activities - Ollie Holman, a student of electronic and computer engineering at the University of Kent, used his technical skills to create and sell phishing toolkits instead of pursuing legitimate programming opportunities [2]. - From 2021 to 2023, Holman designed and sold 1,052 phishing toolkits to clients in 24 countries, targeting 69 banks, government agencies, and charities [2][3]. - The phishing toolkits included comprehensive "scam toolchains" with web templates, information collection scripts, deployment guides, and technical support [2]. Group 2: Methodology and Impact - One notable case involved a toolkit that mimicked a charity's donation page, capturing users' banking information when they attempted to donate [3]. - Holman distributed these toolkits via the encrypted messaging platform Telegram and provided technical support to other fraudsters, creating a community of nearly 700 users [4]. Group 3: Legal Consequences - Despite being arrested in October 2023, Holman continued to offer support for his phishing toolkits until a second arrest in May 2024, where police found substantial electronic evidence linking him to the crimes [5]. - He was convicted on seven counts, including aiding and abetting crime and producing tools for fraud, and was sentenced to seven years in prison [6]. - The UK Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) plans to pursue further legal action to recover the £300,000 (approximately 2.88 million RMB) that Holman earned illegally [7].