Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the severe impact of a ransomware attack on Einhaus Group, a German mobile repair giant, leading to operational paralysis and financial distress, ultimately resulting in bankruptcy proceedings for its subsidiaries [1][10]. Group 1: Incident Overview - In March 2023, Einhaus Group experienced a ransomware attack by the notorious hacker group "Royal," which encrypted all internal systems, halting business operations [3][4]. - The hackers demanded a ransom of approximately $230,000 in Bitcoin, threatening to permanently delete all data if not paid [4]. Group 2: Immediate Consequences - Following the attack, Einhaus Group faced a complete operational shutdown, leading to significant customer loss and financial damage, with direct losses estimated in the millions of euros [5][6]. - The company had to resort to manual processing of claims and customer inquiries due to the system failure, severely affecting service quality and customer satisfaction [5][6]. Group 3: Recovery Efforts - To mitigate the crisis, Einhaus Group made drastic cuts, reducing its workforce from around 170 employees to just 8 core staff members responsible for all remaining operations [6]. - The company sold its headquarters to alleviate cash flow issues and liquidated capital investments to buy time, but these measures were insufficient to reverse the downward trend [7][8]. Group 4: Legal and Financial Implications - German authorities arrested three suspects linked to the attack and seized cryptocurrency assets, including those believed to be from the ransom payment, but the funds could not be returned to Einhaus Group due to ongoing investigations [9][10]. - The inability to recover the ransom funds effectively ended the company's hopes for restructuring and recovery, leading to bankruptcy proceedings for its subsidiaries [10]. Group 5: Industry Context - The incident highlights a growing trend where companies reliant on digital systems face existential threats from cyberattacks, emphasizing the need for robust cybersecurity measures and strategic resource allocation [11].

Group 1 - The article discusses the humorous experiences of children pretending to be adults on social media, highlighting the innocence and creativity of kids in the digital age [1][3][4] - Various anecdotes are shared, including a middle school girl teaching life lessons and a fifth-grade girl giving advice on family conflicts, showcasing the amusing interactions between children and adults online [5][6][4] - The article reflects on the bittersweet reality of children growing up in a digital environment, where they often take on roles that are far beyond their age [4][3] Group 2 - The article includes comments from parents and netizens sharing their own funny stories about their children engaging in adult-like behavior online, creating a sense of community and shared laughter [5][6][4] - It emphasizes the generational gap in understanding social media, as parents often find themselves surprised by their children's online personas [3][4] - The overall tone is light-hearted, with a focus on the joy and humor that these situations bring to family life and social interactions [1][4][5]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emotional and financial implications of adulthood, particularly focusing on the realization of spending one's own money and the associated feelings of both joy and pain [10][12][22]. Group 1 - The article highlights the transition from carefree spending to a more cautious approach when individuals start using their own money, leading to a mix of happiness and reluctance [10][12]. - It reflects on the societal expectations and pressures that come with adulthood, such as the need to be responsible with finances and the emotional toll it takes [22][30]. - The narrative includes anecdotes about how spending habits change when individuals are responsible for their own finances, contrasting experiences of spending family or partner's money versus their own [12][10]. Group 2 - The article also touches on the differences in workplace culture, particularly in Hong Kong, where encouragement and respect are emphasized, contrasting with more hierarchical structures elsewhere [30]. - It discusses the importance of feeling valued and respected in professional settings, which can significantly impact job satisfaction and performance [30][22]. - The piece concludes with reflections on the complexities of adult life, including the balance between personal desires and financial realities [22][10].

Core Viewpoint - Qualcomm is set to unveil the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen2 processor at the Snapdragon Summit from September 23 to 25, 2025, which is expected to generate significant interest in the Android market [1][3]. Group 1: Qualcomm and Xiaomi Collaboration - Qualcomm will deepen its collaboration with Xiaomi, making Xiaomi the first manufacturer to launch a smartphone equipped with the Snapdragon 8 Elite chip [4]. - Xiaomi has consistently held the first-launch position for new Snapdragon processors in recent years, with the Xiaomi 16 series currently generating high interest [5]. Group 2: Xiaomi 16 Series Features - The Xiaomi 16 series will feature five models, including Xiaomi 16, Xiaomi 16 Pro, Xiaomi 16 Pro Max, Xiaomi 16 Ultra, and a special version of Xiaomi 16 Ultra with a magnetic external lens [6]. - The Xiaomi 16 and Xiaomi 16 Pro will have a 6.36-inch 1.5K display, while the Pro Max and Ultra will feature a larger 6.85-inch screen with Real RGB OLED technology [7]. - A classic secondary screen design may return in the Xiaomi 16 series, potentially measuring 3-4 inches to display notifications and other information [8][10]. Group 3: Performance Specifications - All models in the Xiaomi 16 series will be powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen2, built on TSMC's N3P process, featuring a second-generation self-developed Oryon CPU with a maximum clock speed of 4.6GHz and an Adreno 840 GPU [12]. - The expected AnTuTu benchmark score for the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen2 is around 4 million [12]. Group 4: Camera Upgrades - The camera specifications vary across the models, with the Xiaomi 16 featuring a main camera upgrade to the OmniVision OV50Q sensor [16]. - The Xiaomi 16 Pro and Pro Max will have a main camera upgrade to the STMicroelectronics SC590XS sensor and will include a periscope telephoto lens with a 5x zoom [16]. - The Xiaomi 16 Ultra is expected to feature a one-inch main camera and a dual telephoto lens setup, with a new generation 200MP Samsung HPE sensor [17]. Group 5: Pricing and Release Timeline - There are no indications of a price increase for the Xiaomi 16 series, suggesting it will maintain the starting price of the previous generation [21]. - The expected launch date is approximately three days after the Snapdragon Summit, potentially allowing for availability before the National Day holiday in China [21].

Core Viewpoint - Wi-Fi 8 is being defined to ensure reliable performance in complex environments, even under network congestion and interference, aiming to provide excellent connectivity [1][3]. Group 1: Wi-Fi 8 Features and Standards - Wi-Fi standards are developed by a global team of engineers and technical experts within the IEEE 802.11 framework, with multiple tech companies actively participating in the Wi-Fi 8 standardization process [3]. - The current Wi-Fi performance metrics can achieve multi-gigabit throughput, latency below 10 milliseconds, and a packet loss rate of less than 0.1%. Wi-Fi 8 aims to surpass Wi-Fi 7 and achieve quantifiable performance improvements in challenging scenarios [3][5]. - Wi-Fi 8 is expected to serve as a foundational connectivity base for a thriving ecosystem, introducing new features during the 802.11bn standardization process [5][7]. Group 2: Development Timeline and Future Impact - The 802.11bn standard is a collaborative effort within the 802.11 working group, which is making steady progress and has reached a high level of consensus on most new standard content. Wi-Fi Alliance certification is expected in January 2028, with final approval from the working group in March [11]. - The 802.11bn working group will continue to refine and finalize the foundational standards for the future Wi-Fi 8 generation, which is anticipated to be applied to billions of devices over the next decade [11].

以下文章来源于不会笑青年 ，作者不会笑青年 不会笑青年 . 全网唯二的程序员主题漫画公众号。 知乎看到一个典型的职场问题。 "跟领导反映工作量太大了忙不过来，领导反问我：你为啥不加班？" 果然还真是个"好办法"啊... 问题是这领导亲戚又啥也不会。 于是你和另一个同事每天爆肝干活，好不容易鼓起勇气给领导反映："领导，我们真的忙不过来， 得想想办法。" 结果领导一抬头： "你为啥不加班？" 先说说背景 简单说就是，部门一共三个人。 但说白了—— 就是三个人的饭，两个干饭的，一个蹭饭的。 那个"蹭饭"的还是领导的亲戚，不干活还拿高工资，最擅长的技能是： 嚼舌根、搞分裂、装不 懂。 你和领导说太忙，领导说："那你就分点活给她嘛。" 试试"有效沟通"？ 可以看得出，题主是个责任心很强的员工。 但这个问题，在这个只有三个人，还有一个是领导亲戚的小集体里，去"沟通"类似的诉求，基本 没有意义。 别说是你这样直说，你就是摆事实、列数据，讲策略，基本也都没有意义。 为啥？直白点说： 领导对每个人啥水平，谁干活谁划水，他亲戚是个什么档次， 他心里清清楚楚 ，只是他不想解 决。 他不是不知道你累—— 而是他招你之前，就是这么计划 ...

转自：喵大白话 一个施工类的大企业 某天半夜突然有个资深老工程师 发了一张高清无码的私密照在几百人的大群里...... 半小时过去了也没人敢说话 私密照也没有被撤回 于是 群里的中层领导们开始救火了 先后在群里刷屏公司新闻 试图盖过这个私密照事件 本以为到这就结束了 结果到了第二天 公司的前台妹妹在群里发了一条 "今天是老总生日" 于是新的一轮刷屏又开始了 老总深受感动 然后在群里回应： 谢谢 今天不是我生日 有一种超级荒诞的真实感 看完感觉生活里也没有什么是过不去的了 我上班就在这样： 初稿还没写 关注 一些分类 · 迪本自语 O 金鱼本人 开会我会装作在深思的样子 8034 07-11 上海 回复 2 公众号 · 作者赞过 就是哔哔啵 C 我开会的样子 6918 5天前 广东 回复 一个杨桃三块五 哈哈哈很形象了 5天前 广东 回复 公众号 · 喵大邱 同事说每次开会,我都这个表情往那一坐 不是你听我说 这是我开会发呆被老板点名发言的表情 就开始放空发呆 4天前 广西 回复 2 公众号· 喵本自通 07-11 上海 回复 2 公公号 · 英文自语 没事就吃溜溜梅女士 安排工作突然听到自己的名字60 4天前 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the issue of expired files on WeChat, highlighting user frustrations and the misinformation surrounding methods to recover these files. It emphasizes that changing the phone's date does not affect the expiration status of files, and the official response from WeChat clarifies the actual mechanisms behind file expiration [5][10][24]. Summary by Sections User Frustration - Users often encounter issues with important files, images, and videos becoming "expired" on WeChat, leading to frustration over the inability to access them [1]. - The design of the expiration mechanism has been criticized by users, who feel that while files become inaccessible, they still occupy storage space [1]. Misinformation and Official Response - A claim circulated that changing the phone's date to within 7 days of receiving a file could allow users to view expired content, which was refuted by WeChat staff [2][5]. - WeChat clarified that the expiration period for files is actually 14 days, not 7, and that the expiration mechanism does not rely on the user's local time [7][8]. Recovery Methods - Users are advised to contact the sender for a resend if files are expired [13]. - Files may be retrievable from the computer version of WeChat if synchronization and backup features are enabled [14]. - The article suggests using WeChat's fault repair function, although it is primarily for issues caused by app crashes [16][18]. - Users can also check the storage space management feature in WeChat to attempt recovery, but this is only effective if the files have not been actively cleared [19][21]. - Third-party data recovery software is mentioned as a potential option, but it carries risks of data loss and privacy concerns [22]. Preventive Measures - To avoid issues with expired files, users are encouraged to download and save important files promptly, use the favorites feature for long-term storage, and regularly back up files to cloud services or external devices [23][24].

Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy surrounding NetEase's game account deletion policy has sparked significant backlash from players, who feel that the automatic deletion of accounts after one year of inactivity is unfair and constitutes a violation of their rights [1][2][3]. Group 1: Account Deletion Policy - NetEase's service agreement states that if a user does not log in for 365 consecutive days, the platform reserves the right to delete the account and all associated game data [2]. - This clause was first introduced in the updated agreement in November 2022 [2]. - Many players reported not receiving any notification regarding the deletion, and customer service responses were vague, further aggravating player dissatisfaction [3]. Group 2: Player Sentiment - Players expressed strong emotional responses, highlighting that their accounts contain years of memories and real monetary investments, equating the deletion to losing personal property without notice [4]. - Some players argued that even if they stop playing, it does not mean they relinquish their rights to their accounts [4]. Group 3: Legal Perspectives - Legal experts suggest that if game companies fail to provide reasonable notification or set unreasonable deletion timelines, such clauses could be deemed invalid and infringe on users' property rights [5]. - Courts have recognized game accounts as "virtual property," which includes not only usage rights but also certain ownership and disposal rights, especially concerning monetary investments made by players [5][6]. Group 4: Industry Comparisons - NetEase maintains that users do not own their accounts but have "limited usage rights," allowing the platform to enforce the deletion policy [6]. - In contrast, other major gaming platforms like Steam and Epic do not delete accounts or purchased content due to inactivity, indicating a different approach to user rights [6]. Group 5: Regulatory Context - Starting January 2025, California's digital goods protection law AB 2426 will require platforms to clarify that users receive "licenses" rather than ownership, aiming to prevent consumer deception [9]. - Despite this, the law does not authorize platforms to revoke user content without notification [9]. Group 6: Emotional and Ethical Considerations - Players desire to retain their accounts even if they are not actively playing, emphasizing the emotional and financial investments involved [10]. - There are calls for platforms to provide notifications, grace periods, and data backup mechanisms before account deletion, highlighting the need for more humane and transparent communication from companies [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing difficulty in distinguishing between real and AI-generated content, exemplified by a viral video of rabbits "partying" that fooled millions on TikTok, raising concerns about the future of media authenticity [1][12][23]. Group 1: AI-Generated Content - A viral video featuring rabbits was created using AI technology, deceiving a large audience who believed it to be real [4][12]. - The video's success in misleading viewers is attributed to the low-quality, blurry nature of surveillance footage, which obscures typical indicators of AI generation [8][12]. - The static background of the video helped it avoid common pitfalls of AI-generated content, making it appear more realistic [8]. Group 2: Public Reaction and Implications - The incident has led to a broader realization among viewers, including younger generations, that they too can be deceived by AI-generated media [12][15]. - The video garnered significant attention, with over 500 million views on TikTok, highlighting a global concern about the inability to differentiate between reality and AI fabrication [23]. - The article raises questions about the future of media consumption and the potential consequences of believing in fabricated content, suggesting a need for societal adaptation to a world where "seeing is not necessarily believing" [23][24].