登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：000712 证券简称：锦龙股份 公告编号：2026-08 广东锦龙发展股份有限公司 第十届董事会第二十五次（临时）会议决议公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗 漏。 广东锦龙发展股份有限公司（下称"公司"）第十届董事会第二十五次（临时）会议通知于2026年1月25 日以书面结合通讯的形式发出，会议于2026年1月27日以现场结合通讯方式在公司会议室召开。会议应 出席董事8人，实际出席董事8人，会议由公司董事长张丹丹女士主持，符合《公司法》及《公司章程》 的规定。会议审议通过了以下议案： 一、审议通过了《关于借款暨关联交易的议案》。同意6票，反对0票，弃权0票。本议案涉及关联交 易，关联董事禤振生先生、陈浪先生回避了表决。 为偿还公司借款、补充公司流动资金，董事会同意公司向公司控股股东东莞市新世纪科教拓展有限公司 （下称"新世纪公司"）及其母公司东莞市弘舜劭和发展股份有限公司（下称"弘舜公司"）借款，借款总 额合计不超过人民币8亿元，期限一年。在8亿元额度内，公司可根据各时段的资金需求向新世 ...

证券代码：000712 证券简称：锦龙股份 公告编号：2026-08 公司董事会提请公司股东会授权董事会办理本次向新世纪公司 和弘舜公司借款的具体事宜，授权公司董事长代表公司与新世纪公司 和弘舜公司签署《借款合同》等法律文件。 本议案的具体情况详见公司《关联交易公告》（公告编号： 2026-09）。 广东锦龙发展股份有限公司 第十届董事会第二十五次（临时）会议决议公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整， 没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 广东锦龙发展股份有限公司（下称"公司"）第十届董事会第二 十五次（临时）会议通知于 2026 年 1 月 25 日以书面结合通讯的形式 发出，会议于 2026 年 1 月 27 日以现场结合通讯方式在公司会议室召 开。会议应出席董事 8 人，实际出席董事 8 人，会议由公司董事长张 丹丹女士主持，符合《公司法》及《公司章程》的规定。会议审议通 过了以下议案： 一、审议通过了《关于借款暨关联交易的议案》。同意 6 票，反 对 0 票，弃权 0 票。本议案涉及关联交易，关联董事禤振生先生、陈 浪先生回避了表决。 为偿还公司借款、补充公司流动资金，董事会 ...

每经AI快讯，锦龙股份1月27日晚间发布公告称，公司第十届第二十五次董事会临时会议于2026年1月 27日在公司会议室召开。会议审议了《关于召开2026年第一次临时股东会的议案》等文件。 每经头条（nbdtoutiao）——国际金价冲破5000美元！7年涨了280%，什么时候才见顶？专家：关键还 看美元，重点关注国际货币体系、降息和科技革命 （记者 王瀚黎） 免责声明：本文内容与数据仅供参考，不构成投资建议，使用前请核实。据此操作，风险自担。 每日经济新闻 ...

广东锦龙发展股份有限公司（下称"公司"）为偿还公司借款、 补充公司流动资金，董事会同意公司向公司控股股东东莞市新世纪科 教拓展有限公司（下称"新世纪公司"）及其母公司东莞市弘舜劭和 发展股份有限公司（下称"弘舜公司"）借款，借款总额合计不超过 人民币 8 亿元，期限一年。在 8 亿元额度内，公司可根据各时段的资 金需求向新世纪公司和弘舜公司分期借款，分期还款。公司按照不超 过新世纪公司、弘舜公司综合融资成本的借款年利率向其计付借款利 息，预计本次借款的年利率不超过 10%。公司本次向新世纪公司和弘 舜公司借款无需提供任何抵押或担保。 鉴于新世纪公司为公司控股股东、弘舜公司为公司控股股东新世 纪公司的母公司，根据《深圳证券交易所股票上市规则》的规定，新 世纪公司和弘舜公司为公司关联方，公司本次向新世纪公司和弘舜公 司借款事项构成关联交易（下称"本次交易"）。 证券代码：000712 证券简称：锦龙股份 公告编号：2026-09 广东锦龙发展股份有限公司 关联交易公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整， 没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 一、关联交易概述 （一）关联交易基本情况 1 ...

广东锦龙发展股份有限公司 关于召开 2026 年第一次临时股东会的通知 证券代码：000712 证券简称：锦龙股份 公告编号：2026-10 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整， 没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 一、召开会议的基本情况 1．股东会届次：广东锦龙发展股份有限公司（下称"公司"） 2026年第一次临时股东会。 2．股东会的召集人：公司董事会。 公司第十届董事会第二十五次（临时）会议审议通过了《关于召 开2026年第一次临时股东会的议案》。 3．会议召开的合法、合规性：本次股东会的召开符合有关法律、 行政法规、部门规章、规范性文件、深圳证券交易所业务规则和《公 司章程》的规定。 4．会议召开的日期、时间： （1）现场会议召开时间：2026年2月13日（星期五）14：50。 （2）网络投票时间为：通过深圳证券交易所交易系统进行网络 投票的时间为：2026年2月13日9:15—9:25，9:30—11:30和13:00— 15:00；通过深圳证券交易所互联网投票系统投票的时间为：2026年2 月13日9:15—15:00期间的任意时间。 5．会议的召开方式：本次股东会采用现场 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a legal dispute involving Jinlong Co., Ltd. and Zhongshan Securities, stemming from a channel business transaction that occurred a decade ago, highlighting the ongoing risks and responsibilities associated with such financial arrangements [2][3][4]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - The dispute originated from a 3.5 billion yuan transaction where Everbright Bank's Changchun branch claims its funds were misappropriated through fraudulent activities involving employees and the actual controller of the financing party [2][4]. - The lawsuit seeks a total of 489 million yuan, including damages for the occupied funds, as Everbright Bank alleges that the involved parties should bear joint liability for the losses incurred [4][11]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings and Historical Context - This is not the first lawsuit; Everbright Bank previously sued the Wuxi branch of China Merchants Bank in 2015 over the same issue but lost the case [6][8]. - The Supreme Court ruled that the agreements involved were fraudulent and did not reflect the true intentions of Everbright Bank, leading to a dismissal of their claims [8][9]. Group 3: Implications for Channel Business - The article emphasizes the ongoing scrutiny of channel business practices, particularly after the introduction of asset management regulations aimed at curbing such activities [11][12]. - Judicial precedents indicate that channel providers may be held liable for losses, as seen in cases where trust companies were required to compensate investors for negligence in managing channel business [10][12].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a complex loan fraud case involving multiple financial institutions and a troubled rice company, highlighting ongoing legal disputes and the financial struggles of Zhongshan Securities, a subsidiary of Jinlong Co., which is facing significant litigation and declining performance [1][2][22]. Group 1: Fraud Case Overview - A loan fraud scheme involving 3.5 billion yuan was orchestrated by Liu Mouyi, the actual controller of Liuhe Ju Xin Yuan Rice Industry Co., and Zhang Mou, a bank executive, leading to a network of deceit across four financial institutions [1][4]. - The fraudulent activities included the forgery of bank documents and misrepresentation of the company's financial status to secure loans that were never legitimately obtained [4][6]. - The case has resulted in criminal convictions for the key perpetrators, but civil disputes continue, with claims totaling 4.89 billion yuan against Zhongshan Securities and other financial institutions [7][8]. Group 2: Zhongshan Securities' Legal and Financial Challenges - Zhongshan Securities has been involved in over 90 million yuan of litigation in the past year, which represents approximately 3.77% of its latest audited net assets [2][10]. - The company reported a 29% decline in revenue and an 88% drop in net profit for 2025, indicating severe financial distress [17][22]. - The ongoing legal issues and declining performance have raised concerns about the company's compliance and risk management practices, which have been criticized in the past [20][21]. Group 3: Impact on Jinlong Co. - Jinlong Co., the controlling shareholder of Zhongshan Securities, has faced four consecutive years of losses exceeding 900 million yuan, with a high equity pledge ratio of 98.98% [19][22]. - The company has attempted to alleviate its financial burden by planning to sell stakes in Zhongshan Securities and Dongguan Securities, although these efforts have faced challenges [19][22]. - The financial instability of Jinlong Co. poses additional risks to Zhongshan Securities, complicating its recovery and operational stability [22].

Group 1 - Zhongshan Securities reported a significant decline in net profit by 88.14% in 2025, with revenue dropping by 29.12% to 550 million yuan, primarily due to a substantial decrease in core income from investment banking fees, asset management fees, and investment income [1] - The company is involved in a legal dispute with a total claim amounting to 489 million yuan, which includes 350 million yuan in principal and 139 million yuan in funds occupation fees, raising concerns about its financial stability [1] - The performance downturn of Zhongshan Securities may trigger market concerns regarding the stability of similar small and medium-sized brokerage firms, potentially impacting their stock performance [2] Group 2 - Ruida Futures announced a significant investment plan to acquire 11.9351% of Shengan Securities for 589 million yuan, aiming to integrate futures and securities businesses to enhance comprehensive financial services [3] - The acquisition price is approximately 1.14 yuan per share, and the target company, Shengan Securities, has shown continuous growth in recent years but faces compliance challenges as it prepares for an IPO [3] - This move reflects Ruida Futures' commitment to transforming into a competitive derivatives investment bank, emphasizing the importance of resource integration and risk management in the financial sector [2][3] Group 3 - CICC's research indicates that the ETF market has ample growth potential, although the growth rate may continue to slow this year, with an increasing share in the overall public fund market [4] - The report highlights the rising importance of institutional funds for asset management firms, suggesting that fund managers need to focus more on attracting institutional capital [4] - While industry-themed products may remain a short-term focus, their long-term driving force for ETF market development is expected to weaken, indicating structural opportunities in the market [4]

Group 1 - The company received a notification from shareholder Zhu Fenglian regarding the release and pledge of shares [1] - A total of 69,000,000 shares were publicly auctioned, with 6,000,000 shares successfully acquired by relevant parties [1] - After the auction, Zhu Fenglian will still hold 126,110,504 shares, representing 14.07% of the company's total share capital [1] Group 2 - The controlling shareholder and its concerted parties have a total of 24,585,000 shares pledged, accounting for 81.78% of their holdings and 27.44% of the company's total share capital, with a financing balance of 1.322 billion [2] - In the next six months, the total number of pledged shares due will be 26,405,000, representing 87.84% of their holdings and 29.47% of the company's total share capital, with a financing balance of 1.572 billion [2] - The pledge financing is not intended for the company's operational needs, and the controlling shareholder has the ability to repay the financing [2] Group 3 - The company will fulfill its information disclosure obligations in a timely manner [12] - The auction of shares is currently in the public notice stage, with potential uncertainties regarding the auction results [11] - The auction is not expected to have a significant impact on the company's management or operations [11]

北京商报讯1月21日，锦龙股份发布公告称，接到公司股东朱凤廉函告，获悉朱凤廉所持有的公司部分股份将被第二次司法拍卖。 公告显示，本次将被拍卖的股份数量为6300万股，占朱凤廉所持股份的47.69%，占公司总股本的7.03%。拍卖起始日为2月5日，到期日为2月6 日。公告指出，本次拍卖尚处于公示阶段，最终结果存在不确定性。预计该事项不会对锦龙股份的经营管理和控股股东地位产生重大影响，锦 龙股份实际控制人不会发生变化。 | 股东 | 是否为控 股股东或 第一大股 | 本次拍卖股 | 占其所 持股份 | 日公 司总 | 是否为 限售股 | 起始日 | 到期日 | 拍卖人 | 原因 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 名称 | 东及其一 致行动人 | 份数量 | 比例 | 股本 比例 | 及限售 类型 | | | | | | 朱凤廉 | 是 | 63, 000, 000 | 47. 69% | 7. 03% | 合 | 2026-2-5 | 2026-2-6 | 广东省东 完市中级 人民法院 | 司法 执行 | （文章来源 ...