Core Viewpoint - Shanghai Xiaojinxi Jewelry Co., Ltd. has been established, with a focus on various jewelry-related activities, and is fully owned by Mingpai Jewelry [1] Company Summary - The legal representative of Shanghai Xiaojinxi Jewelry Co., Ltd. is Yu Caijuan [1] - The company's business scope includes wholesale, retail, manufacturing, and repair services for jewelry [1] - Mingpai Jewelry (002574) holds 100% ownership of Shanghai Xiaojinxi Jewelry Co., Ltd. [1]

Market Overview - The jewelry sector experienced a decline of 2.21% on September 10, with Chao Hong Ji leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3812.22, up 0.13%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 12557.68, up 0.38% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Notable declines in individual stocks include: - Chao Hong Ji (002345) down 6.23% with a closing price of 15.05 and a trading volume of 360,300 shares [2] - Mankalon (300945) down 4.96% with a closing price of 22.82 and a trading volume of 377,600 shares [2] - China Gold (600916) down 2.03% with a closing price of 8.68 and a trading volume of 737,300 shares [2] - Other stocks such as Lao Feng Xiang (600612) and Zhou Da Sheng (002867) also saw declines of 0.72% and 1.44% respectively [1][2] Capital Flow Analysis - The jewelry sector saw a net outflow of 430 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors contributed a net inflow of 422 million yuan [2][3] - The capital flow for key stocks indicates: - Chao Hong Ji had a net outflow of 79.22 million yuan from institutional investors [3] - China Gold experienced a net outflow of 63.42 million yuan from institutional investors [3] - Lao Feng Xiang had a net outflow of 54.84 million yuan from institutional investors [3] Summary of Trading Data - The trading data for the jewelry sector shows significant activity with total trading volumes and values across various stocks, indicating a mixed sentiment among investors [1][2][3]

截至发稿，刘庭宇累计任职时间2年28天，现任基金资产总规模90.46亿元，任职期间最佳基金回报 80.59%， 任职期间最差基金回报-1.95%。 9月9日，明牌珠宝涨5.09%，截至发稿，报6.40元/股，成交1.50亿元，换手率4.54%，总市值33.79亿 元。明牌珠宝股价已经连续3天上涨，区间累计涨幅4.46%。 风险提示：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。本文为AI大模型自动发布，任何在本文出现的信息（包括但不 限于个股、评论、预测、图表、指标、理论、任何形式的表述等）均只作为参考，不构成个人投资建 议。 资料显示，浙江明牌珠宝股份有限公司位于浙江省绍兴市柯桥区柯桥街道镜水路1016号，成立日期2002 年10月15日，上市日期2011年4月22日，公司主营业务涉及中高档贵金属和宝石首饰产品的设计、研 发、生产及销售。主营业务收入构成为：珠宝首饰产品89.71%，房产营销服务5.51%，新能源光伏电池 片产品4.56%，其他0.21%。 从明牌珠宝十大流通股东角度 数据显示，永赢基金旗下1只基金位居明牌珠宝十大流通股东。黄金股ETF（517520）二季度新进十大 流通股东，持有股数166.75万股，占流通股的 ...

Group 1 - The price of physical gold jewelry remained stable at 1060 yuan per gram on September 8, 2025, unchanged from the previous trading day [1] - The gold price has not fluctuated over the last few days, indicating a period of stability in the gold market [1] Group 2 - U.S. Treasury Secretary Becerra addressed questions regarding changes in manufacturing employment, noting a decline in jobs since April despite a previous increase of nearly 500,000 during President Biden's term [2] - An annual employment revision report is expected to be released, which may downwardly adjust employment figures by up to 800,000 jobs, marking the second revision of this data [2] - Becerra highlighted that the majority of new job opportunities are being filled by U.S. citizens or legal residents, indicating a discrepancy with current policy goals as many jobs created during Biden's administration are reportedly occupied by illegal immigrants [2]

Core Insights - The gold and jewelry industry experienced a stark contrast in performance in the first half of 2025, with upstream gold mining companies benefiting from rising gold prices, while downstream consumption faced pressure due to these price increases [1][2]. Group 1: Performance of Selected Companies - Among the 12 selected jewelry companies, only 6 reported increases in both revenue and net profit, while 1 company saw revenue growth without profit increase, and 5 companies experienced declines in both metrics [1]. - The companies that achieved growth in both revenue and net profit include Caibai Co., Mankalon, Chaohongji, Cuihua Jewelry, Ruibeka, and Dia Co. [1]. - Laisen Tongling reported revenue of 870 million yuan, a 37% increase year-on-year, but its net profit fell by 263.52% to 61 million yuan [1]. Group 2: Declining Companies - Five companies reported declines in both revenue and net profit: China Gold, Feiya, Laofengxiang, Mingpai Jewelry, and Xinhua Jin [2]. - China Gold's revenue decreased by 11.54% to 31.098 billion yuan, and its net profit fell by 46.35% to 319 million yuan [3][4]. - Feiya's revenue was 1.784 billion yuan, down 14.08%, with a net profit of 82.45 million yuan, a decrease of 43.97% [3]. - Laofengxiang's revenue dropped to 6.603 billion yuan, a decline of 16.52%, and its net profit decreased by 13.07% to 1.22 billion yuan [3]. - Xinhua Jin's revenue fell by 24.92% to 669 million yuan, and its net profit decreased by 39.45% to 12.87 million yuan [3].

Core Viewpoint - The gold and jewelry industry is experiencing a dichotomy in performance in the first half of 2025, with upstream gold mining companies benefiting from rising gold prices, while downstream consumption is under pressure due to the same price increases [1]. Group 1: Performance of Selected Companies - Among the 12 selected jewelry companies, only 6 reported increases in both revenue and net profit, while 1 company saw revenue growth without profit increase, and 5 companies experienced declines in both metrics [1]. - The companies that achieved growth in both revenue and net profit include Caibai Co., Mankalon, Chaohongji, Cuihua Jewelry, Ruibeka, and Dia Co. [1]. - Laisen Tongling reported revenue of 870 million yuan, a 37% increase year-on-year, but its net profit fell by 263.52% to 61 million yuan [1]. Group 2: Declining Performance - Five companies reported declines in both revenue and net profit: China Gold, Feiyada, Laofengxiang, Mingpai Jewelry, and Xinhua Jin [2]. - China Gold's revenue decreased by 11.54% to 31.098 billion yuan, and net profit fell by 46.35% to 319 million yuan [3][4]. - Feiyada's revenue was 1.784 billion yuan, down 14.08%, with net profit dropping by 43.97% to 82.45 million yuan [3]. - Laofengxiang's revenue fell to 6.603 billion yuan, a decrease of 16.52%, and net profit declined by 13.07% to 1.22 billion yuan [3]. - Xinhua Jin's revenue dropped by 24.92% to 669 million yuan, with net profit down 39.45% to 12.87 million yuan [3].

Core Viewpoint - The jewelry accessories industry is facing significant challenges in profitability, with many companies reporting low sales gross and net profit margins, particularly in the gold accessories segment [1][4]. Group 1: Financial Performance Overview - As of the first half of 2025, the jewelry accessories industry shows a generally poor profitability outlook, with many companies having sales gross margins below 20% [1]. - Among the analyzed companies, Di'A shares, Rebecca, and Feiyada have the highest sales gross margins at 63.42%, 36.93%, and 34.99% respectively [2]. - Conversely, companies like China Gold, Caibai, Mingpai Jewelry, and Laofengxiang have sales gross margins below 10%, with China Gold at a notably low 4.4% [2]. Group 2: Net Profit Margin Analysis - The overall low gross margin levels correspond to similarly low net profit margins within the industry, with only Di'A shares exceeding 10% at 10.16% [4]. - Mingpai Jewelry reported a negative net profit margin due to performance losses, while the lowest net profit margins were recorded by Rebecca, China Gold, and Mingpai Jewelry at 1.59%, 1.04%, and -4.05% respectively [4]. Group 3: Trends in Profitability - A dynamic analysis reveals that only a few companies, including Cuihua Jewelry, Xinhua Jin, and Laishen Tongling, have seen simultaneous increases in both gross and net profit margins [6]. - Companies like Feiyada, Caibai, and Mingpai Jewelry have experienced declines in both sales gross and net profit margins, with Feiyada's gross margin dropping by 1.81 percentage points and net margin by 2.47 percentage points [6][7]. - Caibai's sales gross margin has consistently decreased over three reporting periods, from 11.49% in H1 2023 to 7.15% in H1 2025, indicating a troubling trend [7].

Core Insights - The gold and jewelry industry experienced a mixed performance in the first half of 2025, with upstream mining companies benefiting from rising gold prices, while downstream consumption faced pressure due to the same price increases [1][2]. Group 1: Performance Overview - Among the 12 selected jewelry companies, only 6 achieved both revenue and net profit growth, 1 company saw revenue growth without profit increase, and 5 companies experienced declines in both metrics [1]. - The companies with both revenue and net profit growth include Caibai Co., Mankalon, Chaohongji, Cuihua Jewelry, Rebecca, and Dia Co. [1][2]. Group 2: Companies with Revenue and Profit Growth - Caibai Co. reported revenue of 152.48 million, a 38.75% increase, and a net profit of 4.59 million, up 14.75% [2]. - Mankalon achieved revenue of 15.56 million, a 26.79% increase, and a net profit of 0.77 million, up 35.18% [2]. - Chaohongji's revenue reached 41.02 million, a 19.54% increase, with a net profit of 3.31 million, up 44.34% [2]. - Cuihua Jewelry reported revenue of 22.43 million, a 7.08% increase, and a net profit of 1.11 million, up 34.40% [2]. - Rebecca's revenue was 5.98 million, a 4.20% increase, with a net profit of 0.09 million, up 15.31% [2]. - Dia Co. had revenue of 7.86 million, a 0.97% increase, and a net profit of 0.76 million, up 131.61% [2]. Group 3: Companies with Revenue and Profit Decline - Five companies reported declines in both revenue and net profit: China Gold, Fiyada, Laofengxiang, Mingpai Jewelry, and Xinhua Jin [3][4]. - China Gold's revenue was 310.98 million, down 11.54%, with a net profit of 3.19 million, down 46.35% [3][4]. - Fiyada reported revenue of 17.84 million, down 14.08%, and a net profit of 0.82 million, down 43.97% [3][5]. - Laofengxiang's revenue decreased to 333.56 million, down 16.52%, with a net profit of 12.20 million, down 13.07% [4][5]. - Mingpai Jewelry had revenue of 19.39 million, down 20.31%, and a net loss of 0.78 million, down 646.62% [3][4]. - Xinhua Jin's revenue was 6.69 million, down 24.92%, with a net profit of 0.13 million, down 39.45% [3][4]. Group 4: Industry Challenges - The overall jewelry industry faced significant challenges, with many companies reporting substantial declines in revenue and profit due to rising gold prices and changing consumer behavior [1][3]. - The closure of numerous franchise stores, such as 593 for China Gold, indicates a contraction in retail presence and potential market challenges [5][6].

Core Insights - The gold and jewelry industry experienced a mixed performance in the first half of 2025, with upstream mining companies benefiting from rising gold prices, while downstream consumption faced pressure due to the same price increases [1][2]. Group 1: Performance Overview - Among the 12 selected jewelry companies, only 6 achieved both revenue and net profit growth, 1 company saw revenue growth without profit increase, and 5 companies experienced declines in both metrics [1][3]. - The companies with both revenue and net profit growth include Caibai Co., Mankalon, Chaohongji, Cuihua Jewelry, Ruibeka, and Dia Co. [1][2]. Group 2: Companies with Revenue and Profit Growth - Caibai Co. reported revenue of 152.48 million, a 38.75% increase, and a net profit of 4.59 million, up 14.75% [2]. - Mankalon achieved revenue of 15.56 million, a 26.79% increase, and a net profit of 0.77 million, up 35.18% [2]. - Chaohongji's revenue reached 41.02 million, a 19.54% increase, with a net profit of 3.31 million, up 44.34% [2]. - Cuihua Jewelry reported revenue of 22.43 million, a 7.08% increase, and a net profit of 1.11 million, up 34.40% [2]. - Ruibeka had revenue of 5.98 million, a 4.20% increase, and a net profit of 0.09 million, up 15.31% [2]. - Dia Co. reported revenue of 7.86 million, a 0.97% increase, and a net profit of 0.76 million, up 131.61% [2]. Group 3: Companies with Revenue and Profit Decline - Five companies reported declines in both revenue and net profit: China Gold, Feiya, Laofengxiang, Mingpai Jewelry, and Xinhua Jin [3][4]. - China Gold's revenue was 310.98 million, down 11.54%, with a net profit of 3.19 million, down 46.35% [3][4]. - Feiya's revenue reached 17.84 million, down 14.08%, and a net profit of 0.82 million, down 43.97% [3][5]. - Laofengxiang reported revenue of 333.56 million, down 16.52%, and a net profit of 12.20 million, down 13.07% [3][5]. - Mingpai Jewelry had revenue of 19.39 million, down 20.31%, and a net loss of 0.78 million, down 646.62% [3][4]. - Xinhua Jin's revenue was 6.69 million, down 24.92%, with a net profit of 0.13 million, down 39.45% [3][4]. Group 4: Challenges Faced by Companies - Laofengxiang faced significant pressure, with a reduction of 279 franchise stores in the first half of 2025 [5]. - Feiya's two main business segments saw declines, with its watch service business revenue down 11.9% and its own watch brand revenue down 18.07% [5]. - China Gold closed 593 franchise stores during the reporting period, indicating operational challenges [6][7].

Market Overview - The jewelry sector increased by 3.65% on September 1, with Mankalon leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3875.53, up 0.46%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 12828.95, up 1.05% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Mankalon (300945) closed at 20.07, up 7.21% with a trading volume of 352,600 shares [1] - Chao Hong Ji (002345) closed at 15.79, up 6.98% with a trading volume of 427,000 shares [1] - Diya Co. (301177) closed at 37.19, up 5.89% with a trading volume of 123,300 shares [1] - Other notable performers include Lai Si Tong Ling (603900) up 4.85% and Cai Zi Co. (6655509) up 4.59% [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The jewelry sector saw a net inflow of 227 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors experienced a net outflow of 120 million yuan [2] - Major stocks like China Gold (600916) had a net inflow of 110 million yuan from institutional investors, but a net outflow from retail investors of 66.43 million yuan [3] - Mankalon also experienced a net inflow of 50.22 million yuan from institutional investors, with retail investors showing a net outflow of 33.41 million yuan [3]