Investors have two ways to win with this steelmaker.In the middle of a trade war, with tariff threats flying fast and furious, you might expect a big commodity company like United States Steel (X -8.71%) to suffer serious damage.But it hasn't. Being part of an industry that tariffs are intended to protect has insulated the company from the worst of the market's recent volatility, and as of Wednesday, U.S. Steel stock was trading at its highest share price of 2025, more than $45.But on Thursday, U.S. Steel s ...

美国钢铁盘前下跌近12%， 美国总统特朗普宣称，不希望美国钢铁公司（搬迁）到日本去。 ...

Core Viewpoint - President Trump expressed opposition to Nippon Steel's $14 billion bid for US Steel, indicating a preference for the company to remain American despite previous actions suggesting a review of the deal [1][3]. Group 1: Company Reactions - Following Trump's comments, shares of US Steel dropped by 13% in after-hours trading [2][3]. - US Steel and Nippon Steel did not provide immediate comments regarding the situation [3]. Group 2: Political Context - The merger faced significant opposition from both political candidates, Trump and Biden, during the presidential election, with both pledging to block the acquisition [5]. - Outgoing President Biden had previously blocked the merger on national security grounds, leading to a lawsuit from the companies against the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) [4][6]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - The Trump administration filed a motion to extend deadlines in the lawsuit to allow more time for merger discussions [6]. - An appeals court was asked to pause litigation until June 5 while CFIUS reviews the merger again, which could potentially resolve the companies' claims [7].

Core Viewpoint - President Trump expressed a desire to prevent American steel from being sold to Japan [1] Group 1 - The statement reflects a broader trend of protectionism in U.S. trade policy [1] - This position may impact U.S.-Japan trade relations, particularly in the steel industry [1] - The move could lead to increased tensions between the two countries regarding trade practices [1]

Group 1 - U.S. Steel Corporation (X) experienced a 12% decline in after-hours trading [1] - President Trump expressed a desire for U.S. Steel not to relocate to Japan [1] - The company is considered unique within the industry [2]

美国总统特朗普：不希望美国钢铁公司被转让给日本。 ...

美国钢铁公司（X）涨2%，美国官员称，特朗普政府对汽车、钢铁、钢铝、（加拿大+墨西哥）汽车关 税都没有调整。 ...

美国钢铁公司：美国总统特朗普下令让美国外国投资委员会（CFIUS）重新对收购交易进行审查。 ...

United States Steel (X) shares rallied 16.2% in the last trading session to close at $44.50. This move can be attributable to notable volume with a higher number of shares being traded than in a typical session. This compares to the stock's 5.7% gain over the past four weeks.X’s shares rallied after the Trump administration ordered a new review of U.S. Steel’s combination with Nippon Steel to determine whether further action would be appropriate. This steel maker is expected to post quarterly loss of $0.35 ...

Group 1: Market Reaction - The markets are experiencing a downturn due to President Trump's global tariff rollout plan, with major indices like the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite, and Russell 2000 hitting 52-week lows [1] Group 2: U.S. Steel Acquisition - Shares of U.S. Steel have surged by 14.5% following President Trump's directive for a review of the potential acquisition by Japan's Nippon Steel, with the offer priced at $55 per share, representing a 44% gain from the previous closing price [2][3] - Both former President Biden and President Trump have previously opposed Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel, but Trump's recent directive indicates a shift in stance, allowing for a review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) [3] - Following a meeting with the Japanese Prime Minister, Trump indicated a potential for Nippon Steel to make a significant investment in U.S. Steel rather than pursuing an outright acquisition [4] - Ancora, a private investment management company, has shifted its position to support the acquisition, suggesting that a new slate of directors it backs would approve the $14.9 billion bid [4][5]