Core Insights - South Korean retail investors are withdrawing from Tesla stocks, favoring cryptocurrencies instead, with a notable net sale of $657 million in August 2025, the highest monthly outflow since 2019 [1][4] - The shift in sentiment indicates a growing preference for riskier assets, as evidenced by Bitmine Immersion Technologies attracting $253 million in net inflows during the same period [3] - Despite the recent sell-off, Tesla remains the most popular foreign stock among Korean individual traders, with $21.9 billion still held, although nearly $1.8 billion has been withdrawn over the past four months [4] Stock Performance - Tesla's stock price is currently trading above $300, specifically at $333, but has shown short-term weakness, with a year-to-date decline of nearly 12% [5] - The retail exodus from Tesla is occurring amid challenges such as increased competition from Chinese manufacturers, declining sales in key markets, and backlash against CEO Elon Musk's political views [7]

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com. ...

Core Viewpoint - Hong Kong-listed shares of BYD experienced a significant decline of up to 7.87% following the announcement of a quarterly profit drop, highlighting the impact of an aggressive price war in the domestic electric vehicle industry [1] Company Summary - BYD reported a profit of 6.4 billion yuan (approximately $891 million) for the June quarter, which represents a decrease of about 30% compared to the same period last year [1] - Despite the profit decline, BYD has seen an expansion in sales overseas, indicating potential growth opportunities outside the domestic market [1]

Group 1 - Tesla's stock has increased by 54% over the past year despite facing multiple external challenges, including tariffs, declining global sales, and increased competition in China [2][8] - The company is experiencing pressure on its used-car pricing, with used Teslas selling almost at the same price as average used cars, while the broader used car market is recovering [3][6] - To combat declining sales, Tesla has introduced leasing options for certified preowned vehicles, offering deals such as $0 down leases starting at $215 per month for 24 months [4][5] Group 2 - Tesla has raised the price of the high-end Cybertruck model to $114,990, introducing a "Luxe Package" that includes Full-Self Driving and other benefits, but this pricing change may not significantly impact overall deliveries or financial performance [7] - Investors are hopeful for earnings growth driven by autonomous vehicles, but the transition from a traditional automaker to a company focused on self-driving technology and AI may alter the original investment thesis [8]

Core Viewpoint - Tesla is seeking to overturn a $243 million jury award related to a fatal crash involving its Autopilot technology, claiming that the jury was misled during the trial [1][6]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - A jury found that while the driver was primarily at fault for the crash, Tesla was also liable due to faulty technology [2][8]. - Tesla argues that the opposing lawyers introduced irrelevant evidence that misled the jury, including claims that Tesla had hidden video and data related to the crash [4]. - The company is requesting a new trial or a significant reduction of the awarded damages [6]. Group 2: Implications for the Industry - The case raises concerns among automakers about potential liability risks if future juries hold manufacturers accountable for accidents even when drivers are negligent [3]. - Tesla's situation could deter innovation in the automotive industry, as companies may fear punitive damages for introducing new safety technologies [3]. Group 3: Autopilot Technology and Public Perception - The term "Autopilot" is criticized by plaintiff lawyers as misleading, suggesting that it encourages drivers to over-rely on the technology, which is not fully autonomous [9][12]. - European regulators have expressed concerns about Tesla's terminology for its driver assistance software, questioning whether it misleads consumers [11]. - The driver involved in the crash admitted to trusting the technology too much, highlighting the risks associated with consumer perceptions of Autopilot [14]. Group 4: Financial Impact - Following the jury's decision, Tesla's stock fell nearly 3.5%, reflecting investor concerns over the company's sales performance and public image [15].

Core Argument - Tesla is seeking to overturn a $243 million verdict related to a lawsuit involving its Autopilot system, claiming the decision contradicts Florida tort law and due process [1][6] Group 1: Case Details - The jury attributed two-thirds of the blame to the driver, George McGee, and one-third to Tesla in a case stemming from a 2019 crash in Florida [2] - The crash involved McGee driving a Tesla Model S at night while using the Autopilot system, which requires drivers to keep their hands on the wheel [2] - McGee's vehicle failed to stop at a stop sign, resulting in a collision that killed a 20-year-old and severely injured another individual [3] Group 2: Legal Arguments - Tesla's legal team argues that product liability laws should penalize manufacturers only when their products perform in ways that are unreasonably dangerous or defy consumer expectations [4] - The company claims that McGee's "extraordinary recklessness" was the primary cause of the accident, as he was distracted by his phone at the time of the crash [6] - Tesla's lawyers assert that the trial was improperly influenced by irrelevant evidence presented by the plaintiffs' counsel, which detracted from the specifics of the case [6]

Core Points - Tesla is appealing a verdict in a product liability and wrongful death lawsuit that could result in a financial liability of $242.5 million if not overturned or reduced [1][2] - The company is seeking to have the compensatory damages reduced from $129 million to a maximum of $69 million, which would limit their payout to $23 million if the original verdict stands [2] - Tesla's legal team argues for the elimination or reduction of punitive damages, citing a statutory cap in Florida that limits such damages to three times the compensatory amount [3] Incident Details - The lawsuit stems from a fatal crash in 2019 in Key Largo, Florida, involving a Tesla Model S driven by George McGee, who was using the Enhanced Autopilot feature [3] - During the incident, McGee dropped his mobile phone and believed that the Enhanced Autopilot would automatically brake for obstacles [4]

Corporate News - Remy Cointreau expects a 20 million euro ($23 million) impact on operating profit due to U.S. tariffs, revised down from a previous estimate of 35 million euros after a trade deal between the U.S. and EU set baseline duties at 15% [5] - The EU has formally proposed the removal of tariffs on U.S. industrial goods, which is a condition set by the White House for reducing rates on automobiles for the bloc [5]

Core Insights - Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology is perceived negatively by potential buyers, with more consumers indicating it would deter them from purchasing a Tesla rather than attract them [1][2]. Consumer Sentiment - A survey conducted by Slingshot Strategies, involving 8,000 Americans, revealed that only 14% believe FSD would increase their likelihood of buying a Tesla, while 35% feel it would decrease their likelihood [2]. - Additionally, 51% of respondents stated that FSD's availability would not influence their car buying decisions, and nearly half of the surveyed consumers think FSD technology should be illegal [2]. Sales Performance - Tesla is experiencing a sales slump attributed to an aging vehicle lineup and heightened competition, with European sales dropping by 40% in July compared to the previous year, marking the seventh consecutive month of decline [3]. Market Position - In the robotaxi sector, Tesla is trailing behind competitors such as Waymo and Baidu's Apollo Go, and is currently in the early testing phases of a ride-hailing service in Austin, Texas, and the San Francisco Bay Area [4]. Future Outlook - Elon Musk has emphasized that Tesla's future relies on its ability to deliver autonomous vehicles and related services, noting that a new variant of the Model Y launched in China may not begin production in the U.S. until late next year, and its future production is uncertain due to the self-driving developments in America [5].

Core Viewpoint - Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology is facing significant consumer skepticism, with many viewing it as a liability rather than an asset, contrasting sharply with the public perception of competitors like Waymo [1][2]. Consumer Sentiment - Nearly half of U.S. consumers believe FSD should be illegal, and buyers are more than twice as likely to avoid Tesla due to this feature [1] - A significant 70% of Americans prefer autonomous vehicles to utilize both LiDAR and cameras, as opposed to Tesla's cameras-only approach, which only has 3% support [2] - 71% of respondents want the government to mandate a dual-system setup for autonomous vehicles [2] Trust and Brand Perception - Tesla's brand trust has declined, with consumers now ranking it as less safe and family-friendly compared to competitors like Toyota and Honda [3] - Two-thirds of survey participants believe Tesla should be held legally responsible for accidents related to FSD or Autopilot [4] Consumer Expectations - Nearly 80% of consumers want advertisements to demonstrate proper usage of FSD, emphasizing the need for hands on the wheel [4] - Only 4% of buyers feel that FSD significantly increases their likelihood of purchasing a Tesla, while almost 30% feel it decreases their likelihood [4] - Consumers are prioritizing accountability, affordability, and reliability over the allure of innovation [5]