（来源：吴说） 吴说获悉，上海浦东新区检察院披露，张某、黄某、李某、杨某非法查询并出售手机基站位置信息牟 利，通过虚拟货币结算，涉案信息 1000 余条，已构成侵犯公民个人信息罪。经查，张某、黄某和李某 共同非法获利 114 万余元，杨某非法获利 3 万余元。法院判处四人有期徒刑三年六个月至一年不等，并 处罚金人民币五十万元至四万元不等；同时在刑事附带民事公益诉讼中，责令其公开赔礼道歉并赔偿公 益损失。 ...

转自：最高人民检察院 今晚九点半 他们购买机票获取票号号段 利用航空公司系统漏洞 黑进系统非法获取旅客信息 并以每条7元至8元的价格 出售给诈骗团伙 …… "某某旅客，您的航班因故障取消，需办理退改签手续……"这是一通诈骗电话。对方为何能如此精准掌握旅客的姓名、航班号，甚至身份证号码？这些个 人信息又是如何被明码标价，在"信息贩子—诈骗团伙"多级流转中，逐渐演变为一场场精心策划的精准诈骗？ 2025年11月20日，经浙江省海盐县检察院提起公诉，法院开庭审理了一起利用航空公司系统漏洞非法获取、出售367万余条旅客信息的案件。12月3日，法 院以侵犯公民个人信息罪分别判处王某、毛某、李某有期徒刑六年、四年、三年十个月，各并处罚金1000万元、15万元、5万元，责令退缴全部违法所 得。一审判决后，被告人提出上诉。 但王女士始终都很纳闷，自己明明是从正规渠道购买的机票，个人信息却如此迅速地落入骗子之手，这究竟是怎么回事？ 在案件侦办过程中，警方顺藤摸瓜，从欠款的去向查到了诈骗分子，再从诈骗分子那里了解到机票个人信息的来源，最终锁定了一个名为"joker"（化名） 的境外社交网络账号。该账号曾大量出售航空旅客的个人信息 ...

转自：最高人民检察院 为扩大保险客户范围，周某尝试过传统的电话推销、去街头发传单揽客、去小区办讲座，都收效甚微。 后来，周某通过网上渠道购买了20余万条公民个人信息，用于联系客户，开展业务。然而，周某还是没谈成几单业务，这让他觉得自己并不适合这个行 业。没过多久，周某向公司提交辞呈。 离职后，周某回到山东老家。周某家境贫困，父母和弟弟都患有疾病，急需用钱，但周某一时间难以找到合适的工作。 2024年10月的一天，无所事事的周某想起自己手中还有20余万条公民个人信息，面对大量的"珍贵资料"，他开始动起歪脑筋："何不找渠道将这些信息变 现呢……" 为拓展保险业务非法购入20余万条公民个人信息，离职后因急需用钱，保险业务员周某便将这些信息当作"珍贵资料"出售，还列出包含姓名、电话、财产 状况等内容的"信息菜单"供买家"点单"。 经查，周某累计向15名买家售卖25万余条公民个人信息，涉案金额4.3万余元。2025年12月15日，周某因侵犯公民个人信息罪获刑。其他涉案人员在进一 步处理中。 （漫画由AI生成） 离职后将客户资源变现 2024年6月，周某入职一家大型保险公司担任业务员，没有底薪，按照业务量拿提成。周某对销 ...

转自：北京日报客户端 为拓展保险业务非法购入20余万条公民个人信息，离职后因急需用钱，保险业务员周某便将这些信息当 作"珍贵资料"出售，还列出包含姓名、电话、财产状况等内容的"信息菜单"供买家"点单"。 经查，周某累计向15名买家售卖25万余条公民个人信息，涉案金额4.3万余元。2025年12月15日，周某 因侵犯公民个人信息罪获刑。其他涉案人员在进一步处理中。 （漫画由AI生成王凤宇制作） 离职后将客户资源变现 2024年6月，周某入职一家大型保险公司担任业务员，没有底薪，按照业务量拿提成。周某对销售保险 没有从业经验，只知道推销保险需要找到有意向的客户，所以拥有丰富的客户资源至关重要。 为扩大保险客户范围，周某尝试过传统的电话推销、去街头发传单揽客、去小区办讲座，都收效甚微。 后来，周某通过网上渠道购买了20余万条公民个人信息，用于联系客户，开展业务。然而，周某还是没 谈成几单业务，这让他觉得自己并不适合这个行业。没过多久，周某向公司提交辞呈。 宋某加了周某的微信，周某将包含各类公民个人信息的"菜单"发给宋某，让他根据自身需要"点 单"。"菜单"中的内容包括姓名、电话、家庭住址等基本公民个人信息，甚至还有 ...

新华社济南12月14日电（记者邵琨）近日，山东省烟台市公安局福山分局在冬季守护专项行动中， 成功斩断一条非法交易链条——在社交平台的隐秘角落，300多个捆绑着真实姓名、人脸信息、银行卡 的微信小店账号，正被层层加价转卖，每一个都堪称埋藏原主人身份信息的"定时炸弹"。 案件线索，源于福山网警日常网络巡查的一次"较真"。 一网民公然兜售"已实名认证微信小店账号"，还特意强调"包过平台审核"，支持直播、提现等核心 功能。"微信小店注册要提交营业执照、人脸核验等一堆材料，审核比普通账号严得多，'包过审'本身 就反常。"办案民警敏锐察觉到不对劲，顺着这条线索深查，很快锁定了嫌疑人乔某。 在乔某的住处，民警当场查获用于交易的手机、电脑，里面密密麻麻的聊天记录和转账凭证，清晰 勾勒出他的"生财路径"：先通过社交平台联系个体工商户、小微商户，以低价收购他们闲置或无暇经营 的微信小店账号；接着对账号进行功能测试、信息整理，专门筛选那些"信息齐全"——完成人脸识别、 绑定银行卡和营业执照的账号，再以翻倍价格转卖给下游"客户"。 "这类账号功能完整，能直接用于经营或其他用途，在黑市里更抢手，卖价也更高。"办案民警介 绍，乔某就靠这 ...

Core Viewpoint - A real estate agency in Shanghai reported a case of personal information leakage, leading to an investigation that uncovered a significant illegal operation involving the sale of personal data related to property listings [1] Group 1: Incident Overview - In November 2024, a real estate agency in Shanghai reported that its exclusive property information was allegedly leaked, causing disturbances for homeowners [1] - The investigation revealed that an internal staff member, Ren, was using their position to illegally sell personal information of homeowners, accumulating over 10,000 pieces of data and generating over 3 million yuan in illicit funds [1] Group 2: Criminal Network - The investigation identified a complete criminal chain involving information acquisition, agency distribution, and end-user purchase, with over 10 agents involved in the resale of the information [1] - By January 2025, police arrested 13 suspects, all of whom had experience in real estate sales, indicating a well-organized operation [1] Group 3: Ongoing Operations - From March to May 2025, police conducted further operations, arresting an additional 18 suspects involved in the illegal trade of property information [2] - A total of 31 suspects have been apprehended, all facing charges for violating personal information laws, with the case progressing through the legal system [2]

Core Insights - A criminal gang involved in the illegal sale of personal information in the real estate sector was dismantled by the Shanghai Fengxian police, revealing a significant breach of citizen privacy [1][2] Group 1: Criminal Activities - The investigation began after a real estate agency reported suspected leaks of exclusive property information, leading to the identification of a key suspect, Ren, who exploited his position to sell personal information [1] - Ren sold over 10,000 pieces of personal information, generating illegal profits exceeding 3 million yuan (approximately 0.43 million USD) [1] - The criminal operation involved a complete chain from information acquisition to distribution and sale, with multiple accomplices identified [2] Group 2: Law Enforcement Actions - A coordinated operation across multiple regions led to the arrest of 31 suspects, all charged with violating personal information laws [2] - The police uncovered additional leads related to lower-tier distributors, resulting in further arrests [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a legal case involving the illegal acquisition of personal information and defamation, highlighting the implications of such actions under Chinese law [1][10]. Group 1: Case Overview - The case involves a teacher, Zhu, whose personal information was illegally obtained by his relative, Wu, and used to defame him online [3][10]. - Wu provided Zhu's wife's ID information to Chen, who then purchased Zhu's personal data for RMB 13,150, including 1,442 records related to Zhu and others [3][4]. Group 2: Impact and Consequences - The defamatory posts reached over 2 million views, causing significant distress to Zhu and affecting students at his school, leading to psychological counseling for affected students [4][10]. - The defendants were sentenced to prison terms and fines for violating personal information laws, with Wu receiving 11 months and Chen receiving 1 year [6][7]. Group 3: Legal Framework - The case is analyzed under Article 253 of the Criminal Law, which addresses the illegal sale or provision of personal information, with severe penalties for serious violations [9][11]. - The court emphasized the need to consider the motives, methods, and consequences of the defendants' actions when determining the severity of the offense [11].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has defined the illegal acquisition of personal information for the purpose of defamation in the case of Wu Mouhui and Chen Mouqiang, highlighting the legal implications of such actions [1] Case Background - The victim, Zhu Mou, is a teacher at a middle school in Jiangsu Province, and the defendant, Wu Mouhui, is a relative of Zhu Mou. After a conflict, Wu Mouhui provided Zhu Mou's wife's ID information to Chen Mouqiang to obtain Zhu Mou's personal information [2] - In May 2020, Chen Mouqiang purchased 1,442 pieces of information, including accommodation records and travel details of Zhu Mou and others, for RMB 13,150 [2][3] - The information was used to create defamatory posts online, which quickly spread and reached over 2 million views, causing significant distress to Zhu Mou and his family [3] Court Rulings - On February 1, 2021, the Suzhou District People's Court sentenced Wu Mouhui to 11 months in prison and a fine of RMB 2,000 for violating personal information laws, while Chen Mouqiang received a one-year prison sentence and the same fine [5] - The court noted that the actions of Wu Mouhui and Chen Mouqiang, although not fitting specific criteria for severe cases, were deemed serious due to the nature and impact of their actions [7] Legal Reasoning - The court referenced Article 253-1 of the Criminal Law, which penalizes the illegal acquisition and sale of personal information, emphasizing the need to consider the motives, methods, and consequences of such actions [6][8] - The case illustrates that the social harm caused by the defendants' actions was significant enough to classify their behavior as "serious" under the law, despite not meeting the explicit criteria outlined in legal interpretations [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - The rise of telecom network fraud and related crimes has led to an increase in associated crimes that support and facilitate these fraudulent activities, with the crime of aiding information network criminal activities (referred to as "aiding crime") being the most prevalent and complex type of crime [1] Group 1: Characteristics of Aiding Crimes - Aiding crimes are increasingly organized and professional, as demonstrated by cases where individuals set up "studios" to illegally provide technical assistance for fraud, such as unblocking internet accounts and fake registrations [2] - New types of aiding crimes exhibit stronger technical and covert characteristics, with cases involving advanced communication technology that supports telecom fraud, highlighting the need for stringent legal action against such crimes [3] - The interconnected nature of new information network crimes has led to a large-scale black and gray industrial chain, necessitating comprehensive legal action against both telecom fraud and its associated crimes [3] Group 2: Legal and Policy Approaches - The approach to combating aiding and related crimes is systematic, focusing on severe punishment for organized and professional criminal activities while also differentiating treatment for less severe offenders, particularly minors and students [4] - The implementation of a lenient policy for certain offenders, such as students involved in aiding crimes, emphasizes education and rehabilitation, with legal actions taken to prevent recidivism [4] - Future efforts by the judiciary and law enforcement will focus on intensifying the crackdown on aiding crimes and enhancing comprehensive governance to ensure network security and public safety [4]