"四种形态"是一个环环相扣、严密完整的逻辑体系，学习培训是提高准确运用"四种形态"能力水平重要 方式。河南省濮阳县纪委监委一方面，将准确运用"四种形态"作为纪检监察干部的必修核心课，依 托"纪检监察干部大讲堂"平台开设专题培训班，由业务骨干从适用情形、执行标准、实践要点等方面进 行深度解读；另一方面，通过定期组织开展案例式、模拟式、答疑式研讨交流，强化实操能力。 中央纪委国家监委网站 陈瑶 日前，江苏省南京市栖霞区每名纪检监察干部案头上，多了一本典型案例汇编手册，通过案例的形式为 准确运用"四种形态"精准定性量纪执法提供指引。 据了解，该手册由栖霞区纪委监委案件审理室组织编印。在编印前，该区纪委监委还专门召开全区"四 种形态"案例编写培训会，结合中央纪委国家监委发布的执纪执法指导性案例，为参与编写工作的纪检 监察干部讲解思路方法。 "案例编写的过程也是学习的过程。"栖霞区纪委监委一名参与此次编写工作的干部说，在运用"四种形 态"时会遇到对适用情形和政策界限把握不够精准的情况，通过这次学习，不仅提升了案例编写能力， 也深刻理解"四种形态"的内涵和逻辑，进一步提升了分析把握案件本质的能力。 纪律是戒尺，"四种形态 ...

Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The national disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies received a total of 3.144 million reports from January to September 2025, indicating a significant level of public engagement in reporting misconduct [1]. Group 1: Reporting and Case Handling - A total of 996,000 reports were related to accusations and complaints [1] - 1.976 million problem clues were processed, leading to 789,000 cases being filed [1] - Among the filed cases, 90 were at the provincial and ministerial level, 3,704 at the departmental level, 31,000 at the county level, and 106,000 at the township level [1] Group 2: Disciplinary Actions - A total of 677,000 individuals were disciplined, with 502,000 receiving party disciplinary actions and 220,000 receiving administrative penalties [1] - Disciplinary actions included 41 at the provincial and ministerial level, 2,953 at the departmental level, 24,000 at the county level, and 84,000 at the township level [1] Group 3: Application of "Four Forms" - The "Four Forms" approach was applied to educate and handle 1.376 million individuals, with 688,000 receiving criticism and education (50% of total) [3] - The second form was applied to 556,000 individuals (40.4%), while the third and fourth forms each handled 66,000 individuals (4.8%) [3] Group 4: Bribery Investigations - A total of 25,000 cases of bribery were filed, with 3,127 individuals being transferred to the procuratorate [4]

Core Insights - The National Supervisory Commission reported a total of 314,400 complaints received from January to September 2025, with 996,000 being accusations and complaints [4] - A total of 1,976,000 problem clues were processed, leading to 789,000 cases being filed, including 90 provincial and ministerial level officials [4] - Disciplinary actions were taken against 677,000 individuals, with 502,000 receiving party disciplinary actions and 220,000 receiving administrative penalties [4] Summary by Categories - **Complaints and Reports** - 314,400 complaints were received, with 996,000 being accusations [4] - **Case Handling** - 1,976,000 problem clues were processed, resulting in 789,000 cases filed [4] - Specific breakdown of cases includes 90 provincial level officials, 3,704 departmental level officials, and 31,000 county level officials [4] - **Disciplinary Actions** - 677,000 individuals were disciplined, including 41 provincial level officials and 29,530 departmental level officials [4] - 502,000 received party disciplinary actions and 220,000 received administrative penalties [4] - **Criticism and Education** - 1,376,000 individuals were subjected to criticism and education, with 688,000 under the first form of criticism [4] - The second form accounted for 556,000 individuals, while the third and fourth forms each accounted for 66,000 individuals [4] - **Bribery Investigations** - 25,000 bribery cases were filed, with 3,127 individuals transferred to the procuratorate [4]

Core Points - The national disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies received a total of 3.144 million petitions from January to September 2025, with 996,000 being complaints and accusations [1] - A total of 1.976 million problem clues were handled, leading to 789,000 cases being filed, including 90 at the provincial and ministerial level, 3,704 at the departmental level, 31,000 at the county level, and 106,000 at the township level [1] - Disciplinary actions were taken against 677,000 individuals, with 502,000 receiving party disciplinary actions and 220,000 receiving administrative penalties [1] Summary by Sections Disciplinary Actions - 789,000 cases were filed, with specific breakdowns by rank: 90 provincial and ministerial officials, 3,704 departmental officials, 31,000 county officials, and 106,000 township officials [1] - Disciplinary actions included 41 provincial and ministerial officials, 2,953 departmental officials, 24,000 county officials, 84,000 township officials, and 90,000 general officials, along with 476,000 individuals from rural areas and enterprises [1] Handling of Petitions - The agencies processed 3.144 million petitions, with 996,000 being complaints and accusations [1] - A total of 1.976 million problem clues were addressed [1] Application of "Four Forms" - The "Four Forms" approach was applied to criticize and handle 1.376 million individuals, with 688,000 handled under the first form (50%), 556,000 under the second form (40.4%), and 66,000 under the third and fourth forms (4.8% each) [2] - The approach emphasizes simultaneous investigation of bribery and corruption, with 25,000 cases filed against bribers and 3,127 cases referred to the procuratorate [5]

坚持受贿行贿一起查，立案行贿人员2.5万人，移送检察机关3127人。 [ 责编：袁晴 ] 图1：全国纪检监察机关处分人员按职级划分图 图2：全国纪检监察机关运用"四种形态"占比图 2025年1至9月，全国纪检监察机关运用"四种形态"批评教育和处理137.6万人次。其中，运用第一种形态批评 教育和处理68.8万人次，占总人次的50%；运用第二种形态处理55.6万人次，占40.4%；运用第三种形态处理 6.6万人次，占4.8%；运用第四种形态处理6.6万人次，占4.8%。 2025年1至9月，全国纪检监察机关共接收信访举报314.4万件次，其中检举控告类信访举报99.6万件次。处置 问题线索197.6万件。立案78.9万件，其中立案省部级干部90人、厅局级干部3704人、县处级干部3.1万人、乡 科级干部10.6万人；立案现任或原任村党支部书记、村委会主任7.2万人。处分67.7万人，其中党纪处分50.2万 人、政务处分22万人；处分省部级干部41人，厅局级干部2953人，县处级干部2.4万人，乡科级干部8.4万人， 一般干部9万人，农村、企业等其他人员47.6万人。 ...

Core Points - The article emphasizes the importance of early detection and correction of issues in the supervision of public officials, particularly in the context of corruption prevention [3][4][5] - It highlights the implementation of the "Four Forms" as a framework for supervision, aiming to create a multi-layered defense against corruption [6][7] - The article discusses the integration of technology in supervision, utilizing big data and AI to enhance the effectiveness of oversight [6][10] Group 1 - The focus is on proactive supervision to prevent minor issues from escalating into major problems, advocating for a mechanism that allows for early detection and resolution [4][5] - Emphasis is placed on daily supervision practices, including various methods such as receiving reports, conducting interviews, and monitoring key personnel [5][9] - The article calls for a comprehensive and coordinated supervision system that integrates various forms of oversight, including party supervision and public scrutiny [6][9] Group 2 - The need for a robust system of accountability is stressed, with a focus on the responsibilities of party leaders and the importance of a clear chain of command [9][10] - The article advocates for a dual approach of punishment and prevention, aiming to eliminate the conditions that foster corruption through systemic reforms [7][8] - It highlights the significance of institutional frameworks to regulate power operations and minimize opportunities for corruption [8][10]

Core Viewpoint - The implementation of the "Four Forms" is a significant theoretical, practical, and institutional innovation by the Party Central Committee, aimed at strengthening Party construction and deepening self-revolution, ensuring the Party's advanced nature and purity [1][2]. Group 1: Understanding the "Four Forms" - The "Four Forms" embody the basic concepts and specific requirements of strict governance of the Party, serving as a strategic tool for advancing anti-corruption efforts [1][2]. - The approach emphasizes early intervention and small corrections, preventing minor issues from escalating into major problems, reflecting care and concern for Party members [1][2]. - The "Four Forms" integrate deterrence, punishment, education, and awareness, connecting the concepts of not daring to be corrupt, not being able to be corrupt, and not wanting to be corrupt [1][2]. Group 2: Practical Application of the "Four Forms" - The first form focuses on early detection and correction of minor issues through conversations, education, and warnings, particularly targeting key positions and new cadres [3][4]. - The second and third forms aim to prevent general violations from developing into criminal behavior, with strict enforcement of discipline [4]. - The fourth form serves as a warning to the majority by addressing the "very few" who violate rules, enhancing the deterrent effect [4]. Group 3: Enhancing Capability in Implementing the "Four Forms" - Strengthening training and education for disciplinary inspection and supervision personnel is essential to deepen understanding of the "Four Forms" [5][6]. - Practical training and real-case exercises are emphasized to improve the ability to identify and handle issues effectively [5][6]. - Establishing a robust quality control mechanism for cases ensures that the application of the "Four Forms" is precise and adheres to established standards [5][6].

Group 1 - Political supervision is a crucial guarantee for implementing the Party's political line and ensuring the centralized and unified leadership of the Party Central Committee [1] - Political supervision should be specific and in-depth, preventing generalization and vagueness, with clear tasks, targets, content, and standards [1] - Focus on major national issues and integrate them with local responsibilities, establishing clear accountability and ensuring effective implementation of reforms [1] Group 2 - Political supervision must emphasize precision, requiring political sensitivity and problem-solving capabilities [2] - Regular and systematic political supervision is essential, with mechanisms for continuous monitoring and feedback to ensure high-quality implementation [2] - The integration of supervision, case handling, reform, and governance is necessary to enhance the quality and effectiveness of political supervision [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of understanding the anti-corruption struggle with a historical perspective and strategic height, linking it to the party's mission of seeking happiness for the people and rejuvenation for the nation [2][3] - The anti-corruption efforts since the 18th National Congress have been unprecedented in their intensity and determination, contributing significantly to the historical achievements and transformations of the party and the country [2][3] - The current phase of the anti-corruption struggle requires maintaining the party's health and purity, ensuring it remains the strong leadership core of socialism with Chinese characteristics [2][3] Group 2 - The intertwining of improper conduct and corruption is a prominent issue that needs to be addressed in the current anti-corruption efforts, necessitating a mechanism for simultaneous investigation and treatment of both [3] - Responsibilities must be clearly defined and enforced at all levels of the party to ensure effective management and accountability in combating corruption [3] - A comprehensive approach is required to enhance the ability to identify issues, utilizing various methods such as public feedback, inter-departmental checks, and data analysis to uncover hidden problems [3] Group 3 - The anti-corruption struggle relies on the efficient operation of the disciplinary inspection and supervision system, which must align with the central government's directives and maintain high standards in service delivery [4] - Continuous research and understanding of the current challenges in supervision and investigation are essential for effective decision-making and policy formulation [4] - A focus on tracking progress and ensuring the implementation of anti-corruption measures is critical for achieving the desired outcomes [4]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of discipline education in enhancing the awareness of party members and officials, integrating it into their daily actions and thoughts [1][2] - The Shandong Provincial Discipline Inspection and Supervision Commission focuses on targeted education for key individuals, including young and newly promoted officials, to foster a culture of integrity and compliance [2][3] - The approach combines positive guidance with negative warnings, utilizing cultural resources to instill a sense of discipline among party members [2][3] Group 2 - The Shandong discipline inspection authorities are committed to thorough political supervision, ensuring that disciplinary issues are addressed promptly and effectively [3][4] - The implementation of the "Four Forms" of discipline is aimed at expanding the scope of supervision from punishing a few to managing the majority, enhancing the regulatory framework [4] - The emphasis is placed on balancing strict management with encouragement for initiative, creating a positive political environment for officials to operate [4]