中国能源经济研究院零碳园区专委会 ZERO CARBON PARK COMMITTEE OF CHINA INSTITUTE OF ENERGY ECONOMICS 俄罗斯《消息报》当地时间9月29日援引匿名外交人士报道称，美俄两国可能于1 0月举行新一轮双边外交谈判，就消除双边关系中 的"刺激因素"，包括使馆工作正常化及俄罗斯在美外交财产归属问题进行磋商。 美国驻俄使馆在回应《消息报》的相关问询时，没有否认10月可能举行俄美会谈的消息。另有一位知情人士向《消息报》表示，具体 日期虽未最终确定，但双边磋商确实计划于10月末至11月初开展。 来源：央视新闻客户端 End 欢迎分享给你的朋友！ 出品 | 中国能源报（c ne ne rgy） 编辑丨赵方婷 2)中国际在线索研究院 china institute of energy economics 美俄两国可能于1 0月举行新一轮双边外交谈判 。 & 010-65367131/9485/9497 网 zgnyb2025@163.com 零砖同筑 产业共兴 ...

巴加埃说，美国"直接参与并协助以色列持续对巴勒斯坦人实施种族灭绝、系统性恐怖主义及对多 国持续侵略"，指责伊朗支持"恐怖主义"无法使美国摆脱这些指控。他说，美国非法袭击伊朗，暴露其 当政者"对伊朗的仇恨"。 新华社德黑兰9月25日电（记者陈霄 沙达提）伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃25日在社交媒体发文驳斥美 国对伊朗支持"恐怖主义"的指控，批评美国声称提供外交解决途径的说法"虚伪荒谬"。 巴加埃说，美国在外交谈判期间袭击对方国家，所谓提供外交途径的说法"虚伪荒谬"。 美国和伊朗自今年4月以来举行五轮由斡旋方阿曼居中传话的间接谈判，双方在铀浓缩等核心议题 上分歧巨大。第六轮谈判原定于6月15日举行，因以色列突袭伊朗而取消。以伊12天冲突期间，美国轰 炸伊朗核设施，作为回击，伊朗用导弹打击美军驻卡塔尔乌代德空军基地。为施压伊朗与美国恢复谈 判，英国、法国、德国8月28日通知联合国安理会，以伊朗违反伊核协议为由，启动"快速恢复制裁"机 制。9月19日，安理会未能通过旨在继续解除对伊朗制裁的决议草案。 ...

Group 1 - The core message of the meeting between Trump and Putin is the hope for an end to the Ukraine conflict, although no agreement was reached during the discussions [2][13][15] - The meeting lasted approximately 2 hours and 40 minutes, with both leaders expressing a desire for constructive dialogue and future cooperation [9][13] - The choice of Alaska as the meeting location is significant, symbolizing historical ties and strategic considerations between the U.S. and Russia [18][17] Group 2 - The financial markets reacted positively ahead of the meeting, with U.S. and European stock indices reaching new highs, while gold and oil prices showed signs of decline [31][32] - Analysts suggest that if a constructive agreement is reached, it could lead to a significant impact on global commodity supply and prices, particularly for oil and gold [32][34] - The potential easing of sanctions on Russia could be beneficial for European stocks, but any final resolution would require the involvement of key stakeholders, including Ukraine [33][34]

Core Viewpoint - The potential meeting between Trump and Putin has raised significant concerns, particularly among European leaders and Ukraine, about the implications for regional security and the decision-making process regarding Ukraine's fate [2][3][4]. Group 1: Reactions from European Leaders - Following the announcement of the Trump-Putin meeting, leaders from six European countries and the EU Commission President issued a joint statement emphasizing that any decisions regarding Ukraine must include European participation [4][5]. - The statement reflects a strong collective response from European leaders, who fear being marginalized in discussions that directly affect their security interests [8][9]. - The urgency of the European response is underscored by their historical involvement in the Ukraine crisis, including military aid and economic sanctions against Russia [7][9]. Group 2: Implications for Ukraine - The situation has led to deep concerns among Ukrainians, with citizens questioning the sacrifices made in the conflict if their fate is to be decided by major powers without their input [3][4]. - Ukrainian soldiers on the front lines are also expressing doubts about the future of their struggle, fearing that their efforts may be disregarded in negotiations [4][10]. Group 3: Diplomatic Dynamics - The European leaders' statement indicates a clear message to Trump that any diplomatic solution must prioritize the security interests of Europe and Ukraine [6][10]. - The emphasis on a ceasefire as a prerequisite for meaningful negotiations highlights the complexities of the diplomatic landscape and the need for cooperation among all parties involved [10][11]. - The collective action of European leaders serves as a demonstration of unity and a call for respect in international negotiations, reinforcing the idea that true partnerships require mutual acknowledgment and dialogue [11][12].

据塔斯社：俄罗斯副外长里亚布科夫就美国总统特朗普的评论表示，俄罗斯已准备好进行谈判，外交途 径是更为可取的方式。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Iran is unwilling to accept imposed peace and insists that negotiations must be based on mutual respect [1][2][3] Group 1: Negotiation Stance - Iranian officials emphasize that all past negotiations with the U.S. have revolved around three core issues: nuclear weapons development, missile issues, and regional influence [2] - Iran maintains that it has never sought to develop nuclear weapons and views uranium enrichment as an inalienable right [2] - Despite distrust, Iran acknowledges that diplomacy is a form of struggle and that negotiations provide a platform for dialogue [2] Group 2: Conditions for Future Negotiations - Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif states that Iran is willing to negotiate on the basis of mutual respect but highlights past U.S. actions, including withdrawal from the nuclear agreement and military aggression, as threats to Iranian security [3] - There is a prevailing sentiment in Iranian media that the U.S. is untrustworthy in negotiations, and Iran must be cautious to avoid falling into traps set by the U.S. and Israel [3]

Core Viewpoint - Iran's Foreign Minister stated that progress made in negotiations with the United States has been undermined, attributing the disruption not to Iran but to America's apparent allies [1] Summary by Relevant Categories Negotiation Status - Iran has received multiple letters indicating that the U.S. may be preparing to resume negotiations [1] - Despite this, Iran remains skeptical about further dialogue, emphasizing a cautious approach to diplomatic solutions [1] Diplomatic Relations - Iran continues to express a desire to resolve issues through diplomatic means, yet there are significant doubts regarding the sincerity and reliability of the U.S. and its allies [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration continues to engage in both direct and indirect communications with Iran to advance negotiations for an agreement [1] Group 1 - The U.S. government is actively pursuing diplomatic channels with Iran [1]

Core Viewpoint - Israel is reportedly engaged in secret talks with Russia regarding issues related to Iran and Syria, indicating a potential shift in diplomatic relations and a search for peace agreements in the region [1] Group 1: Diplomatic Engagement - Israel and Russia have initiated undisclosed diplomatic discussions following a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, suggesting a new phase in their interactions [1] - The Israeli government views Russia as a potential partner in de-escalating tensions in the region, highlighting a strategic approach to foreign relations [1] Group 2: Regional Stability - The discussions aim to explore the possibility of reaching a peace agreement with Syria, reflecting Israel's interest in stabilizing the situation in the area [1] - Reports from Syrian state television indicate that these talks are focused on the broader implications of Iranian influence in Syria [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that despite the ceasefire agreement between Iran and Israel, the underlying issue of Iran's nuclear program remains unresolved, and the duration of the ceasefire is uncertain [1] - Both Iran and Israel have suffered significant losses during the recent conflict, making prolonged warfare unsustainable, and the U.S. is also reluctant to engage further, leading to a temporary ceasefire as a pragmatic choice for all parties involved [1][2] - The U.S. has lost credibility in negotiations with Iran due to its inconsistent approach, complicating future talks regarding Iran's nuclear program [1] Group 2 - Diplomatic negotiations are deemed the only viable solution to the Iranian nuclear issue, as military actions have not resolved the core problems, including the handling of Iran's nuclear materials and the verification by the International Atomic Energy Agency [2] - There is a significant uncertainty regarding the potential for successful negotiations, as previous rounds have not yielded results, and the future of the ceasefire hinges on reaching a compromise [2] - If negotiations fail, Israel may resort to military action against Iran's nuclear facilities, potentially leading to increased instability in the Middle East [3]