29日，美国华盛顿，美国总统特朗普（左）在白宫欢迎以色列总理内塔尼亚胡（右）。视觉中国 资料 图 新华社报道，美国全国广播公司（NBC）12月20日援引知情人士的话说，特朗普与内塔尼亚胡预计将 于本月晚些时候在美国佛罗里达州海湖庄园会晤。内塔尼亚胡届时或将表示，伊朗弹道导弹项目的扩张 不仅将对以色列构成威胁，也会危及地区安全及美国相关利益，需要迅速采取军事行动。预计内塔尼亚 胡还将向特朗普提出美方参与或协助该军事行动的选项。 近日知情人士透露，因日益担心伊朗"扩大其弹道导弹产量"，以色列官员正准备向美国总统特朗普汇报 再次打击伊朗的方案。 2025年9月 "午夜铁锤行动"是美军今年6月对伊朗发动的军事打击。当时，美军出动包括7架B-2隐形轰炸机在内超 过125架飞机，袭击伊朗三处核设施。特朗普与美国防部当时宣称，此次打击已"彻底摧毁伊朗铀浓缩能 力"。不过部分初步评估显示，实际破坏程度可能并没有特朗普所言的如此严重。 以色列计划向特朗普通报、并让特朗普选择是否参与可能的进一步对伊军事打击，正值特朗普考虑对委 内瑞拉发动军事行动之际。若付诸实施，这将为美国开启新的战线。 不过，以色列对伊朗的担忧，正值德黑兰表达 ...

报道称，以色列计划向特朗普通报并让特朗普选择是否参与可能的进一步对伊朗军事打击。 据参考消息援引新加坡《联合早报》网站1 2月20日报道，知情人士透露，以色列官员日益担心伊朗扩大弹道导弹项目的生产规模，正 准备向美国总统特朗普汇报再次打击伊朗的方案。 报道称， 以色列计划向特朗普通报并让特朗普选择是否参与可能的进一步对伊朗军事打击。 此举正值特朗普考虑对委内瑞拉发动军事 行动之际。 若付诸实施，这将为美国开启新的战线。 美国全国广播公司引述一名直接了解计划的人士，以及四名前美国官员之语称，若不加以遏制，伊朗的弹道导弹月产量可能增至多达 3000枚，大量弹道导弹将有助伊朗更好地防护核浓缩设施。 来源：参考消息、长安街知事 End 欢迎分享给你的朋友！ 出品 | 中国能源报（c ne ne rgy） 编辑丨赵方婷 2)中国际在线索研究院 china institute of energy economics 中国能源经济研究院零碳园区专委会 ZERO CARBON PARK COMMITTEE OF CHINA INSTITUTE OF ENERGY ECONOMICS 消息人士称，以色列官员担心伊朗正在重建今年 ...

特朗普12月18日在被问及29日是否与内塔尼亚胡会面时，对记者说："我们还没有正式敲定，但他希望 见我。" 但以色列官员已宣布，双方将于12月29日会面。 报道说，以色列计划向特朗普通报并让特朗普选择是否参与可能的进一步对伊朗军事打击，此举正值特 朗普考虑对委内瑞拉发动军事行动之际。若付诸实施，这将为美国开启新的战线。 据新加坡《联合早报》网站12月20日报道，知情人士透露，以色列官员日益担心伊朗正在扩大弹道导弹 项目的生产规模，正准备向美国总统特朗普汇报再次打击伊朗的方案。 美国全国广播公司引述一名直接了解计划的人士，以及四名前美国官员之语称，若不加以遏制，伊朗的 弹道导弹月产量可能增至多达3000枚，大量弹道导弹将有助伊朗更好地防护核浓缩设施。 消息人士称，以色列官员担心伊朗正在重建今年6月遭美军轰炸的核浓缩设施。但他们同时指出，相比 之下，伊朗恢复弹道导弹生产设施、修复遭重创的防空系统，是更为迫切的安全关切。 预计特朗普将于本月稍晚在佛罗里达州会见以色列总理内塔尼亚胡。消息人士说，内塔尼亚胡届时将向 特朗普强调，伊朗扩大弹道导弹项目构成严重威胁，可能需要迅速采取行动。 报道同时指出，以色列对伊朗的担忧， ...

Core Viewpoint - Iran's Speaker of Parliament, Ghalibaf, emphasized the country's support for diplomatic engagement and negotiations on an equal basis, criticizing the U.S. for imposing its demands rather than seeking solutions [1] Group 1 - Iran is open to diplomatic contacts and negotiations, provided they are based on equality [1] - Previous negotiations were characterized by the U.S. imposing its demands on Iran, leading to a perception of coercion [1] - The Iranian government views the U.S. approach as an attempt to force Iran into submission rather than resolving issues [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that President Putin has stated that a ceasefire with Ukraine can only be declared if Ukrainian forces withdraw from territories claimed by Russia [2][3] - Putin reiterated Moscow's long-standing position that an unconditional ceasefire is impossible, emphasizing that military action will continue if Ukraine does not withdraw from occupied territories [3] - Russia has ruled out the possibility of freezing the conflict or an unconditional ceasefire, believing it would allow Ukraine and its Western supporters to regroup and resupply their military [3] Group 2 - Putin expressed appreciation for Hungary's balanced stance on the Ukraine issue during a meeting with Hungarian Prime Minister Orban, indicating a willingness to discuss all matters and seek solutions [5] - The bilateral trade between Russia and Hungary decreased by 23% last year due to external factors, but there has been a 7% recovery in trade this year [6] - Hungary's energy security relies on stable and predictable energy supplies from Russia, and Hungary is keen to maintain dialogue in the energy sector [6] Group 3 - Russia is currently only negotiating with the United States regarding the Ukraine issue, as stated by Kremlin spokesperson Peskov [7] - The U.S. and Ukraine held talks in Geneva, where a new plan to end the Ukraine crisis was modified from 28 points to 19 points [8] - Peskov mentioned that Russia does not wish to discuss the resolution of the Ukraine issue through public statements or extensive publicity [9]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the United States and Russia are likely to hold a new round of bilateral diplomatic negotiations in October to address "stimulating factors" in their bilateral relations [3] - The discussions will include normalizing embassy operations and negotiating the ownership of Russian diplomatic property in the U.S. [3] - Although the specific date for the talks has not been finalized, they are planned to take place between late October and early November [3]

Core Viewpoint - Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Baghaei refutes U.S. accusations of Iran supporting "terrorism," labeling U.S. claims of offering diplomatic solutions as "hypocritical and absurd" [1][2] Group 1: U.S. Accusations and Iran's Response - Baghaei criticizes the U.S. for its direct involvement in supporting Israel's actions against Palestinians, which he describes as genocide and systematic terrorism [1] - He argues that U.S. accusations against Iran do not absolve it from its own actions and hatred towards Iran [1] Group 2: Diplomatic Negotiations and Military Actions - Since April, the U.S. and Iran have engaged in five rounds of indirect negotiations mediated by Oman, with significant disagreements on key issues like uranium enrichment [2] - The sixth round of talks, scheduled for June 15, was canceled due to an Israeli attack on Iran, followed by U.S. bombings of Iranian nuclear facilities [2] - In response to the tensions, Iran retaliated by striking a U.S. military base in Qatar [2] - On August 28, the UK, France, and Germany notified the UN Security Council to initiate a "snapback" mechanism against Iran for violating the nuclear agreement [2] - The Security Council failed to pass a resolution aimed at continuing the lifting of sanctions against Iran on September 19 [2]

Group 1 - The core message of the meeting between Trump and Putin is the hope for an end to the Ukraine conflict, although no agreement was reached during the discussions [2][13][15] - The meeting lasted approximately 2 hours and 40 minutes, with both leaders expressing a desire for constructive dialogue and future cooperation [9][13] - The choice of Alaska as the meeting location is significant, symbolizing historical ties and strategic considerations between the U.S. and Russia [18][17] Group 2 - The financial markets reacted positively ahead of the meeting, with U.S. and European stock indices reaching new highs, while gold and oil prices showed signs of decline [31][32] - Analysts suggest that if a constructive agreement is reached, it could lead to a significant impact on global commodity supply and prices, particularly for oil and gold [32][34] - The potential easing of sanctions on Russia could be beneficial for European stocks, but any final resolution would require the involvement of key stakeholders, including Ukraine [33][34]

Core Viewpoint - The potential meeting between Trump and Putin has raised significant concerns, particularly among European leaders and Ukraine, about the implications for regional security and the decision-making process regarding Ukraine's fate [2][3][4]. Group 1: Reactions from European Leaders - Following the announcement of the Trump-Putin meeting, leaders from six European countries and the EU Commission President issued a joint statement emphasizing that any decisions regarding Ukraine must include European participation [4][5]. - The statement reflects a strong collective response from European leaders, who fear being marginalized in discussions that directly affect their security interests [8][9]. - The urgency of the European response is underscored by their historical involvement in the Ukraine crisis, including military aid and economic sanctions against Russia [7][9]. Group 2: Implications for Ukraine - The situation has led to deep concerns among Ukrainians, with citizens questioning the sacrifices made in the conflict if their fate is to be decided by major powers without their input [3][4]. - Ukrainian soldiers on the front lines are also expressing doubts about the future of their struggle, fearing that their efforts may be disregarded in negotiations [4][10]. Group 3: Diplomatic Dynamics - The European leaders' statement indicates a clear message to Trump that any diplomatic solution must prioritize the security interests of Europe and Ukraine [6][10]. - The emphasis on a ceasefire as a prerequisite for meaningful negotiations highlights the complexities of the diplomatic landscape and the need for cooperation among all parties involved [10][11]. - The collective action of European leaders serves as a demonstration of unity and a call for respect in international negotiations, reinforcing the idea that true partnerships require mutual acknowledgment and dialogue [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - Russia is prepared to engage in negotiations, emphasizing that diplomatic channels are a more preferable approach following comments made by U.S. President Trump [1] Group 1 - Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov stated that the country is ready for talks [1] - The emphasis is placed on diplomacy as a more desirable method for resolving issues [1]