北京国府嘉盈会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙）关于公司工作函的专项说明。北京国府嘉盈会计师事务所 对江苏万林现代物流股份有限公司2024年年度报告的信息披露监管问询函进行了专项说明。主要内容包 括：固定资产方面，2023年公司计提固定资产减值损失0.13亿元，主要涉及连云港万林物流有限公司资 产减值，2024年未再计提。应收款项方面，2024年末其他应收款为6990.76万元，主要为贸易代理业务 款，其中应收中国建筑下属子公司3988.12万元，账龄3年以上占比58.59%。债务风险方面，2024年末短 期借款、其他应付款、一年内到期的非流动负债分别为4014.29万元、14904.12万元、1069.55万元，而 货币资金仅1870.22万元，流动比率0.47。管理费用及非经常性损益方面，2024年管理费用为0.66亿元， 同比减少23.47%，其中职工薪酬2554.40万元，同比减少15.06%；非经常性损益中其他项目发生额 为-161.54万元，系本年新增项目。会计师事务所对上述事项进行了核查，认为公司相关会计处理符合 规定。 以上内容为证券之星据公开信息整理，由AI算法生成（网信算备310104345710 ...

《项目投融资与风险防范》 主讲：黄启富 【课程背景】 项目投资是企业发展的助推剂，如果项目投资管理规范、风险控制得当，那么它会让企业获得持续的竞 争能力，但如果盲目扩张，没有意识到项目投融资过程中的风险，那么就有可能投资达不到预期、资金 链断裂等一系列风险，最后将企业拖入财务危机。 前不久，恒大爆发了债务危机，它的风险不是一日累积成的，那么什么是恒大财务危机的关键因素？ 我们再往前回溯到年初，多家五百强企业集体爆发债务危机，现金流断裂，其背后的原因是什么？ 对于大多数企业来说，资金链断裂是表现，背后的原因往往是投资分析不科学，只重视未来收益而对项 目风险分析不够，因此企业在投融资过程中要科学决策、防范风险。 黄老师具有多年的投融资实战经验，运作过多个大项目的投融资和风险防控，其在结合自身几十年不同 行业、不同类型企业投融资工作实践的基础上，采取理论结合实际的教学模式，让学员既掌握理论知 识，也掌握实操工具，达到学之即用的良好效果。 【课程收益】 Ø 掌握项目投资财务分析方法 【课程大纲】 Ø 了解项目投资实施关键要素有哪些 Ø 掌握项目投资有哪些模式可以选择 Ø 掌握项目融资方法 Ø 掌握项目投融资过程中如何 ...

| 年中惠热销课程免费学 | 时长 | 原价 | The Dollea | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | 5 折 | | 上市公司并购重组实务-2025年中惠专辑 | 12h | 899 | 449.5 | | 企业合规实务解析-2025年中惠专辑 | 12h | 899 | 449.5 | | 私募基金实务解析-2025年中惠专辑 | 13h | 799 | 399.5 | | 投行AI应用技巧-2025年中惠专辑 | 11h | 599 | 299.5 | | 企业并购重组实操专题(140案例) | 4.9h | 399 | 199.5 | | 上市公司控制权收购的15种方式 | 1h | 129 | 64.5 | | 并购交易精讲 | 2.7h | 269 | 134.5 | | 并购六条之后跨界并购实务与典型案例 | 1h | 88 | 44 | | 借壳上市与类借壳的模式解析 | 2h | 169 | 84.5 | | 上市公司并购重组审核7大法律要点 | 2.8h | 299 | 149.5 | | 企业出海全攻略 | 12h | 899 | 449.5 | ...

证券研究报告|行业研究报告 [Table_Date] 2025 年 6 月 18 日 [Table_Title] South32 2025Q1 氧化铝产量同比增长 2%至 126.5 万吨，电解铝产量同比增长 7%至 29.8 万吨 [Table_Title2] 有色金属-海外季报 [Table_Summary] 季报重点内容: ► 生产经营情况 1、Worsley 氧化铝 2025Q1 Worsley 氧化铝产量为 94.1 万吨，同比增长 1.5%，环 比减少 5.9%。2025Q1 完成了计划中的煅烧炉维护工作，并控 制了氧化铝工厂有限的铝土矿供应。在获得初步环境审批后， 公司于 2025Q1 启动了 Worsley 矿山开发项目，这将改善铝土 矿的获取渠道，预计至少可维持产量至 2036 财年。2025 财年 的氧化铝产量指引保持不变，仍为 375 万吨。 2025Q1 Worsley 氧化铝销量为 91 万吨，同比增长 2%，环比减 少 6%。在对与 Mozal Aluminium 签订的遗留供应合同中的上 限和下限机制进行年度重置之后，公司在 2025Q1 的氧化铝销 售实际价格与普氏氧化铝指数一 ...

威海广泰空港设备股份有限公司 第一章 总则 第一条 为加强威海广泰空港设备股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）财务管理， 规范财务行为，提高经济效益，保护公司及相关方的合法权益，促进公司健康可持 续发展，结合公司实际情况，制定本制度。 第二条 公司财务行为和财务管理工作必须遵守国家有关法律法规和公司章 程等制度规定，并接受国家有关部门及公司审计委员会的检查和监督。 第三条 本制度适用于公司及所属子公司。 第二章 财务管理体系 第五条 公司及各子公司法定代表人是财务管理工作的最终负责人，对会计 资料的真实性、合法性、完整性负责，按照相关法律法规的规定对公司的财务管理 工作承担最终责任。 第六条 公司及各子公司日常财务管理工作由总经理领导并全面负责，财务 财务负责人负责组织实施财务管理工作，建立完善各项财务制度，向董事长、总经 理提出经营建议及整改措施，落实董事会与财务管理相关的决议。 第七条 公司对下属子公司财务会计工作实行垂直统一管理，委派财务管理 人员，并依照公司相关规定聘任和解聘。 第八条 公司实行统一财务管理，执行统一会计政策、统一会计核算体系。 第九条 公司结合经营特点和管理要求，建立内部管理会计制度，使 ...

Core Viewpoint - Tronox (NYSE:TROX) stock is deemed unattractive at its current price of approximately $5.70 due to multiple significant issues affecting its operational performance and financial health [2][10]. Financial Performance - Tronox's revenues have declined over the past few years, with an average annual decrease of 5.6% over the last three years, contrasting with a 5.5% increase for the S&P 500 [5][6]. - The company's revenues increased by 4.2% from $2.9 billion to $3.1 billion in the last 12 months, while the S&P 500 experienced a growth of 5.5% [6]. - Quarterly revenues decreased by 4.7% to $676 million in the latest quarter from $686 million a year prior, compared to a 4.8% increase for the S&P 500 [6]. Profitability Metrics - Tronox's operating income over the last four quarters was $203 million, resulting in a poor operating margin of 6.7%, compared to 13.2% for the S&P 500 [6]. - The operating cash flow (OCF) during this period was $297 million, indicating an OCF margin of 9.8%, versus 14.9% for the S&P 500 [6]. - The company's price-to-sales (P/S) ratio is 0.3, significantly lower than the S&P 500's ratio of 3.0, and the price-to-free cash flow (P/FCF) ratio stands at 2.7 compared to 20.5 for the S&P 500 [6]. Financial Stability - Tronox's debt amounted to $3.1 billion at the end of the most recent quarter, with a market capitalization of $898 million, leading to a debt-to-equity ratio of 384.7%, in stark contrast to the S&P 500's 19.9% [7]. - The cash (including cash equivalents) of $138 million represents only 2.3% of total assets of $6.1 billion, compared to 13.8% for the S&P 500 [7]. Downturn Resilience - TROX stock has underperformed significantly compared to the S&P 500 during recent downturns, including a 61.2% drop from a peak of $26.24 on October 25, 2021, to $10.19 on October 27, 2023, while the S&P 500 saw a peak-to-trough decline of 25.4% [9]. - During the COVID-19 pandemic, TROX stock fell 66.7% from a high of $12.11 on January 14, 2020, to $4.03 on April 1, 2020, compared to a 33.9% decline for the S&P 500 [9]. Overall Assessment - Tronox's performance across various parameters is summarized as very weak, indicating that despite its low valuation, the stock remains unattractive for investment [10][12].

（一）目标导向原则 模板设计需紧密围绕企业的财务分析目标。不同企业、不同发展阶段的分析重点有所差异，如初创企业可能更关注现金流和成本控制，成熟企业则侧重盈利 能力和资产运营效率。明确分析目标后，才能确定模板所需数据指标和呈现方式，避免数据冗余，确保分析结果具有针对性。 在企业的运营管理中，财务分析是了解企业经营状况、评估财务健康程度、制定战略决策的重要手段。一个高效的财务分析模板能够系统性整合财务数据， 通过清晰的逻辑框架和直观的呈现方式，快速挖掘数据背后的价值，为管理层提供有力决策支持。以下将从财务分析模板的设计原则、核心模块、分析方法 及应用要点等方面，详细阐述如何构建高效财务分析模板。 一、财务分析模板设计原则 （二）数据准确性与完整性原则 财务分析的基础是准确、完整的数据。模板应确保数据来源可靠，如直接对接企业财务系统、ERP 系统等数据源，减少人工录入错误。同时，要涵盖企业 运营的各个关键环节数据，包括资产负债、收入成本、现金流量等，避免重要数据遗漏影响分析结论。 （三）简洁直观原则 高效的财务分析模板应具备简洁性和直观性。避免使用过于复杂的表格和晦涩的术语，采用图表、图形等可视化方式呈现数据，如柱 ...

中证智能财讯 巨涛海洋石油服务（03303）4月30日披露2024年度报告。报告期内，公司实现营业总收入21.06亿元，同比下降19.69%；归母净利润1.85亿 元，同比下降27.42%；经营活动产生的现金流量净额为4.77亿元，同比增长66.25%；据报告显示，巨涛海洋石油服务基本每股收益为0.0904元，加权平均净 资产收益率为8.75%。 以4月30日收盘价计算，巨涛海洋石油服务目前市盈率（TTM）约6.93倍，市净率（TTM）约0.59倍，市销率（TTM）约0.62倍。 市盈率(TTM)历史分位(%) 001 900 90-68 87p35 80 70 60 50 4649 40 40-63 30 20 18.2 10 0 2019-12-37 1 · 7-12-37 · -37 2n- 制图数据来自恒生聚源数据库 市净率(LF)历史分位(%) 巨涛海洋石油服务有限公司是一家主要从事油气设施及油气工艺处理设备制造业务的投资控股公司。该公司经营两个业务分部：石油与天然气行业装备工程 及综合服务分部和新能源和炼化行业装备工程及综合服务分部。该公司主要向石油天然气行业及新能源行业提供装备制造、工程及综合服 ...

Revenue and Profit - The company achieved total operating revenue of 1.087 billion yuan in Q1 2025, representing a year-on-year increase of 11.03% [1] - The net profit attributable to the parent company reached 27.97 million yuan, up 26.75% year-on-year, while the non-recurring net profit decreased by 18.02% to 25.14 million yuan [1] Profitability - The company's gross margin improved to 14.92%, an increase of 0.88% year-on-year, and the net margin rose to 2.51%, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 13.27% [2] Cost Control - Total selling, administrative, and financial expenses amounted to 101 million yuan, accounting for 9.26% of revenue, which is a decrease of 5.44% year-on-year, indicating effective cost control [3] Cash Flow and Asset Status - Operating cash flow per share was 0.08 yuan, a significant decrease of 65.28% year-on-year, raising concerns about cash flow management [4] - Cash and cash equivalents increased to 880 million yuan, up 54.66% year-on-year, while accounts receivable rose to 785 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 3.32%, with accounts receivable to profit ratio at 1142%, indicating potential bad debt risk [4] Capital Structure - Interest-bearing debt increased to 1.001 billion yuan, up 7.41% year-on-year, with a cash to current liabilities ratio of only 64.17%, suggesting short-term debt repayment pressure [5] Business Model and Capital Return - The company's performance relies heavily on R&D and marketing, with a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 2.06%, indicating weak capital returns, and a net margin of 1.33%, suggesting low added value of products or services [6] Dividends and Financing - Since its listing, the company has raised a total of 1.717 billion yuan and distributed dividends totaling 655 million yuan, resulting in a dividend financing ratio of 0.38 [7]

Revenue and Profit - The company achieved total revenue of 335 million yuan in Q1 2025, representing a year-on-year growth of 9.0% [1] - The net profit attributable to shareholders was 58.14 million yuan, up 8.1% year-on-year, while the net profit excluding non-recurring items was 51.68 million yuan, showing a minimal growth of 0.06% [1] Gross Margin and Net Margin - The company's gross margin stood at 33.19%, a decrease of 3.67 percentage points compared to the same period last year [2] - The net margin was 17.25%, down 1.14 percentage points year-on-year, indicating a decline in profitability but still within a reasonable range [2] Expense Control - The company demonstrated good expense control, with total selling, administrative, and financial expenses amounting to 28.59 million yuan, which accounted for 8.54% of revenue, a decrease of 0.23 percentage points year-on-year [3] Accounts Receivable and Cash Flow - Accounts receivable significantly increased to 526 million yuan, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 37.96% [4] - The operating cash flow per share was -0.14 yuan, a decline of 171.09% year-on-year, indicating potential cash flow pressure and the need to monitor accounts receivable recovery [4] Asset and Liability Situation - The company's interest-bearing debt was 1.23 billion yuan, a decrease of 15.26% compared to the same period last year [5] - The interest-bearing asset-liability ratio was 24.81%, suggesting a need for ongoing attention to the company's debt situation [5] Shareholder Equity and Dividends - The net asset per share was 8.36 yuan, an increase of 7.24% year-on-year [6] - Since its listing, the company has raised a total of 1.727 billion yuan and distributed a total of 191 million yuan in dividends, resulting in a dividend-to-financing ratio of 0.11 [6] Business Model and Capital Expenditure - The company's performance is primarily driven by capital expenditures, necessitating close attention to the rationality of capital expenditure projects and any potential funding pressures [7]