大额采购资金经8家贸易商"季度循环"、股权投资的资金去向不明，*ST金泰（300225.SZ）近15亿资金 异常流转的问询回复陷入争议。 *ST金泰在8月12日披露的监管问询回复中称，2024年，该公司为规避原材料价格上涨风险，采取"战略 备库"措施，向贸易商支付超9亿元资金，实际采购金额仅2900余万元，资金流向与采购需求严重背离。 其中，供应商部分资金流向非经营实体，与芮奈贸易（上海）有限公司（下称"芮奈"）的资金往来涉嫌 存在非经营性资金占用情况。 不仅如此，*ST金泰去年还向深圳怡钛积科技股份有限公司（下称"怡钛积"）支付了两笔股权投资款， 合计金额4.6亿元，资金最终流向的、真实目的不明。但该公司一名董事长称，这些资金中的大部分， 经层层划转，最终流向了配资公司。 对于这些回复内容，该公司3名董事并不认同，并投了反对票。董事刘锐明认为，此次回复"避重就轻， 罔顾事实"，战略备库供应商是受同一主体控制的资金通道，公司管理层与实际控制人裴剑等人勾结， 以不干涉采购部之由行侵占公司资金之实。 另据8月13日公告，*ST金泰董事会审计委员会认为，该公司2024年的战略备库行为，已不符合正常采 购锁价的商业实 ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：002872 证券简称：ST天圣（维权） 公告编号：2025-046 天圣制药集团股份有限公司关于公司股票交易被实行其他风险警示相关事项的进展公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露内容的真实、准确和完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗 漏。 特别提示： 因控股股东涉嫌侵占公司资金触发其他风险警示，根据《深圳证券交易所股票上市规则》相关规定，天 圣制药集团股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"或"天圣制药"）股票交易自2019年6月5日起被实施其他风险 警示。 一、实行其他风险警示事项及主要原因 控股股东刘群涉嫌侵占公司资金，由于刘群部分涉案财物已扣押、冻结、查封，预计无法在一个月内将 占用公司的资金归还。根据《深圳证券交易所股票上市规则》相关规定，公司股票交易自2019年6月5日 起被实施其他风险警示。具体内容详见公司在指定信息披露媒体上刊登的《关于公司股票交易被实行其 他风险警示的公告》《关于公司股票交易被实行其他风险警示相关事项的进展公告》。 二、采取的措施及有关工作进展情况 2、公司于2020年3月20日收到重庆市第一中级人民法院出具的《刑事判决书 ...

距离收到监管问询函已过一个月，*ST金泰（300225）(SZ300225，股价4.35元，市值20.68亿元，下称金力泰)的回复仍旧"难产"。 8月7日晚，金力泰披露临时董事会会议决议公告，控股股东海南大禾企业管理有限公司(以下简称海南大禾)召开临时股东大会的申请 再次被董事会高票否决。此外，围绕《关于上海证监局监管问询函回复说明的议案》，董事会成员出现严重分歧。 视觉中国 "(《上海证监局监管问询函回复说明》)通篇表达的核心思想与7月25日董事会审议那版没有实质区别，回复函前后矛盾，相关内容甚 至无法与6月30日公司董事会通过并公告的文件相一致。"8月5日会议当天，新进入董事会的非独立董事刘锐明直指公司管理层法治意 识薄弱："在上海证监局已对公司立案调查的前提下，证监局的问询事项涉及资金可能流向裴剑的情况，管理层未正面回应该事项，核 查不充分。" 针对上述问询函回复说明，金力泰3位独立董事投出反对票。《每日经济新闻》记者注意到，金力泰两版说明回函与公司2024年年报内 容存在矛盾，是引起4位董事反对的核心原因之一。 8月8日，《每日经济新闻》记者从知情人士处了解到，目前已有董事以相关人士涉嫌挪用资金为由向 ...

每经记者｜黄海 每经编辑｜何小桃 陈俊杰 距离收到监管问询函已过一个月，*ST金泰（金力泰）的回复仍旧"难产"。 8月7日晚，*ST金泰披露临时董事会会议决议公告，控股股东海南大禾企业管理有限公司（以下简称海南大禾）召开临时股东大会的申请再次被董事会高 票否决。此外，围绕《关于上海证监局监管问询函回复说明的议案》，董事会成员出现严重分歧。 "（《上海证监局监管问询函回复说明》）通篇表达的核心思想与7月25日董事会审议那版没有实质区别，回复函前后矛盾，相关内容甚至无法与6月30日 公司董事会通过并公告的文件相一致。"8月5日会议当天，新进入董事会的非独立董事刘锐明直指公司管理层法治意识薄弱："在上海证监局已对公司立案 调查的前提下，证监局的问询事项涉及资金可能流向裴剑的情况，管理层未正面回应该事项，核查不充分。" 针对上述问询函回复说明，*ST金泰3位独立董事也投出反对票。《每日经济新闻》记者注意到，*ST金泰两版说明回函与公司2024年年报内容存在矛盾， 是引起4位董事反对的核心原因之一。 回函难产，多名董事直指 上市公司"自相矛盾" 今年7月初，因多家相关贸易商疑似成为关联方资金占用通道、公司资金存在被关联 ...

每经记者｜黄海 每经编辑｜陈俊杰 距离收到监管问询函已过一个月，*ST金泰（金力泰）的回复仍旧"难产"。 8月7日晚，*ST金泰披露临时董事会会议决议公告，控股股东海南大禾企业管理有限公司（以下简称海 南大禾）召开临时股东大会的申请再次被董事会高票否决。此外，围绕《关于上海证监局监管问询函回 复说明的议案》，董事会成员出现严重分歧。 据审计机构出示的专项说明，*ST金泰在2024年通过与芮奈贸易（上海）有限公司（以下简称芮奈贸 易）、江西尚亿供应链管理有限公司、上海悦芮贸易有限公司（以下简称上海悦芮）等贸易商（以下统 称相关贸易商）于每季度初签订采购协议并向相关贸易商转出资金，于每季度末签订采购解除协议由相 关贸易商转回资金。 经对上述贸易商资金延伸核查，审计机构认为，*ST金泰存在将资金转出至相关贸易商后，相关贸易商 又在相近时间点将相近金额转出至非供货主体的异常情形。"我们无法识别非供货主体是否为资金占用 通道方，*ST金泰资金存在通过资金占用通道方流向最终资金占用主体的重大风险。"审计机构方面表 示。 值得注意的是，上述贸易商中，芮奈贸易与上海悦芮工商登记电话相同，企业注册地址相近。而上海悦 芮的法定代 ...

星标 ★ IPO日报 精彩文章第一时间推送 8月6日晚间，*ST东通（全称"北京东方通科技股份有限公司"，300379.SZ）披露公告称，公司收到实际控制人、董事长黄 永军通知，其于当日收到证监会送达的《立案告知书》。因涉嫌信息披露违法违规，证监会决定对其立案。 今年4月，*ST东通发布公告称，公司收到中国证监会下发的《立案告知书》，因公司涉嫌定期报告等财务数据存在虚假记 载，中国证监会决定对公司立案。 *ST东通公告显示，若后续经中国证监会行政处罚认定的事实，公司触及相关规定的重大违法强制退市情形，公司股票将被实 施重大违法强制退市。 不仅是*ST东通，今年以来，A股市场超过60家上市公司收到证监会立案告知书。而这些被立案的上市公司中，部分实控人、 控股股东、高管也被立案调查，甚至被留置。 从立案原因看，信披违法违规是"重灾区"。 例如， *ST沐邦 、 元道通信 、 *ST元成 等公司在立案告知书中明确其涉嫌存在财务数据虚假记载或披露。 诺德股份 、 洪 田股份 涉及关联交易。 华阳股份 、 华阳新材 均牵扯 华阳集团 2021年的一笔资金占用，导致公司"涉嫌未按规定披露非经 营性资金往来"而被证监会立案 ...

Core Points - ST Pava announced on August 3 that one of its actual controllers, Zhang Bao, is under investigation for embezzlement by public security authorities, but the company's control and operations remain normal [1] - The company specializes in the production, research, and sales of lithium-ion battery ternary cathode material precursors for electric vehicles and was listed on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board in September 2022 [1] - Due to a negative audit report from Tianjian Accounting Firm regarding internal controls for the 2024 financial report, ST Pava's stock was placed under risk warning, changing its name to ST Pava [1] - The company acknowledged management issues leading to unfair pricing with suppliers, resulting in overpayment of 180 million yuan, for which Zhang Bao has committed to recover the amount and bear joint liability for the losses [1] Company Overview - ST Pava was established in July 2014 and focuses on electric vehicle battery materials [1] - Zhang Bao, aged 54, holds a PhD and has been with the company since September 2019, serving as general manager and chairman [2] - As of June 24, Zhang Bao is the second-largest shareholder, holding 16.56 million shares, accounting for 10.41% of the company [3] Financial and Operational Status - As of August 1, ST Pava's stock price was 10.01 yuan per share, with a total market capitalization of 1.6 billion yuan [6] - The company reported that Zhang Bao occupied 191 million yuan of company funds, with 30 million yuan already returned [4][5] - The company is actively pursuing the recovery of the occupied funds and has communicated with Zhang Bao to establish a repayment plan [5]

Core Viewpoint - The company, Zhengping Road and Bridge Construction Co., Ltd., is facing significant operational challenges, including a negative audit report on internal controls for 2024, substantial uncertainty regarding its ability to continue operations, and instances of illegal guarantees, leading to its stock being placed under risk warning starting May 6, 2025 [1][2][3]. Group 1: Risk Warnings and Financial Issues - The company received a negative opinion on its internal control audit report for 2024, indicating serious operational issues [2][3]. - The company has been involved in illegal guarantees amounting to 35 million yuan, which have since been resolved [1][3]. - As of the end of 2024, the company reported a non-operating fund occupation of 17.55 million yuan by a minority shareholder, with a current balance of 4.21 million yuan after partial repayment [2][3]. Group 2: Measures and Progress - The company has taken steps to resolve the illegal guarantee issue by repaying the 35 million yuan loan to the bank, which has been cleared [3]. - To address the fund occupation issue, the company has conducted thorough investigations and is working to recover the remaining funds while enhancing internal controls [3][4]. - The company is actively seeking to stabilize its traditional business and expand into new areas to improve revenue and manage liquidity pressures related to temporarily unreturned fundraising of 190 million yuan [4][5]. Group 3: Internal Control Enhancements - The company has established an internal control working group to strengthen management and has initiated a comprehensive review of its internal control systems [5]. - New management procedures for project measurement and settlement have been implemented, along with enhanced communication between departments [5]. - The company is conducting special inspections on ongoing projects to continuously improve management standards [5].

Core Viewpoint - The announcement details the regulatory measures and penalties taken against Shangwei Co., Ltd. over the past five years, highlighting issues related to fund misuse and disclosure irregularities by the company's management. Summary by Sections Recent Regulatory Actions - Over the last five years, the company has not faced any penalties from regulatory authorities or exchanges [1] - On February 22, 2025, the Shanghai Stock Exchange issued a criticism against the company and its controlling shareholder, Li Guangsheng, for misusing company funds amounting to 20 million yuan, of which 15 million yuan has been recovered, leaving a balance of 5 million yuan [1][2] Disclosure Irregularities - The company failed to accurately disclose Li Guangsheng's shareholding information and changes in holdings, which led to regulatory scrutiny [2][5] - The company has committed to improving its internal control systems and enhancing training to prevent future occurrences of fund misuse and disclosure issues [3][7] Remedial Actions - Li Guangsheng has returned the misused funds, and the company has established a dedicated team to recover the remaining amount [3][6] - The company has implemented measures to strengthen internal controls, including training for all employees on risk awareness and compliance with relevant laws [7][8] Previous Warnings and Penalties - On June 28, 2024, the company received a verbal warning for delaying the construction of a project, which violated disclosure regulations [9] - In February 2022, the company faced warnings for improper stock trading activities by its management, including unauthorized share sales and short-term trading [10][11] Conclusion - The company has taken steps to address past issues and improve compliance with regulatory requirements, ensuring that similar incidents do not occur in the future [12]

Core Viewpoint - The transfer of all shares of ST Huamei by its controlling shareholder Shanghai Pengsheng to Yadong Investment for the repayment of 1.49 billion yuan in funds has sparked significant controversy and market attention [1][2]. Group 1: Share Transfer and Financial Implications - Shanghai Pengsheng plans to transfer 214 million shares of ST Huamei, representing 22.32% of the total share capital, to Yadong Investment for 1.556 billion yuan, which will be used to repay the 1.49 billion yuan fund occupation and interest [3][4]. - The actual controller of ST Huamei will change to the Jilin Provincial State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission following this transfer [4]. - The transfer price was later adjusted to 1.62 billion yuan after negotiations [12]. Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Issues - Wang Yufeng's family has submitted an objection letter to the Shanghai Stock Exchange regarding the share transfer, citing unresolved disputes and potential asset transfer to evade debts [4][5]. - The Shanghai Stock Exchange has acknowledged receipt of the objection and will process it according to relevant regulations [4]. - Regulatory scrutiny began over a year ago, with the China Securities Regulatory Commission investigating non-operating fund occupation by Shanghai Pengsheng, which amounted to 1.49 billion yuan as of October 2024 [11][12]. Group 3: Stakeholder Reactions - Market participants and creditors of Shanghai Pengsheng have raised concerns about the legitimacy of the share transfer and its implications for debt recovery [2][5]. - Shanghai Jiuzhou Hongda has also expressed concerns regarding debt disputes with Shanghai Pengsheng, claiming that the asset transfer could lead to significant financial losses for creditors [10].