【 导读 】 监管部门连番出手，严格查处 *ST聆达 、 新华锦 资金占用等问题 中国基金报记者 闻言 8月26日，*ST聆达及相关当事人 收到大连证监局下发的《行政处罚事先告知书》 ，经查明， *ST聆达及相关当事人存在 未按规定披露对 外担保事项、未按规定披露关联方资金占用情况 等违法事实。 同日晚间， 新华锦 公告称，公司在8月25日收到青岛证监局下发的《关于对山东新华锦国际股份有限公司、新华锦集团有限公司、张建华 采取责令改正措施的决定》（以下简称《行政监管措施决定书》）。 截至8月26日，新华锦 实控人控制的新华锦集团有限公司（ 以下 简称新华锦集团） 及其关联方，非经营性占用新华锦资金的余额达4.06 亿元。 青岛证监局责令 相关方在收到《行政监管措施决定书》之日起6个月内归还 。 据悉，若新华锦未能在 责令改正期限内完成整改， 监管部门 将依规 对其 启动规范类退市程序。 2024 年4月发布的退市新规，将大额资金占用未整改纳入规范类退市情形，"以退促改"推动上市公司解决资金占用问题 。 目前，已有8家 A股 公司通过多元方式解决资金占用问题，清收金额合计超80亿元。 同时， 监管层对资金占用、 ...

【导读】监管部门连番出手，严格查处*ST聆达、新华锦资金占用等问题 中国基金报记者闻言 8月26日，*ST聆达及相关当事人收到大连证监局下发的《行政处罚事先告知书》，经查明，*ST聆达及 相关当事人存在未按规定披露对外担保事项、未按规定披露关联方资金占用情况等违法事实。 同日晚间，新华锦公告称，公司在8月25日收到青岛证监局下发的《关于对山东新华锦国际股份有限公 司、新华锦集团有限公司、张建华采取责令改正措施的决定》（以下简称《行政监管措施决定书》）。 截至8月26日，新华锦实控人控制的新华锦集团有限公司（以下简称新华锦集团）及其关联方，非经营 性占用新华锦资金的余额达4.06亿元。青岛证监局责令相关方在收到《行政监管措施决定书》之日起6 个月内归还。 据悉，若新华锦未能在责令改正期限内完成整改，监管部门将依规对其启动规范类退市程序。 2024年4月发布的退市新规，将大额资金占用未整改纳入规范类退市情形，"以退促改"推动上市公司解 决资金占用问题。目前，已有8家A股公司通过多元方式解决资金占用问题，清收金额合计超80亿元。 同时，监管层对资金占用、违规担保，始终坚持"零容忍"的高压态势，前期8家公司在规范类退 ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 转自：证券日报 本报记者 吴晓璐 8月26日晚间，又有2家上市公司因资金占用被监管处罚。 聆达集团股份有限公司（以下简称"*ST聆达（维权）"）关联方在归还全部占用资金、解除了违规 担保后，依旧收到大连证监局的行政处罚告知书，大连证监局拟对公司和相关责任人罚款500万元；山 东新华锦（维权）国际股份有限公司（以下简称"新华锦"）当晚披露的2025年半年报显示，公司存在资 金占用余额4.06亿元，被青岛证监局责令限期6个月整改。如公司未能在责令改正期限内完成整改，将 被依规启动规范类退市程序。 去年4月份发布的退市新规将大额资金占用未整改纳入规范类退市情形，"以退促改"推动上市公司 解决资金占用问题，截至目前，已经有8家公司通过多元方式解决了资金占用问题，清收金额合计超过 80亿元。 在市场人士看来，近年来，监管层对资金占用、违规担保始终坚持"零容忍"高压态势，前期8家公 司在规范类退市的"利剑高悬"下，"一司一策"解决了资金占用问题。此外，监管部门持续推动完善行、 民、刑立体追责体系，充分彰显了监管"长牙带刺"，有棱有角和"两强两严"的监管理念，将更加有效保 ...

上市公司大股东及关联方非经营性资金占用是资本市场顽疾，一直受到监管层的重点关注。8月26日， 因涉嫌资金占用、违规担保事项，监管机构对*ST聆达（300125）作出《行政处罚事先告知书》，对公 司及时任董事长王明圣、副董事长林志煌拟合计罚款500万元。 另一家上市公司新华锦（600735）也在8月26日收到《行政监管措施决定书》，因新华锦集团及其关联 方非经营性占用公司资金余额4.06亿元，监管机构表示，若公司未能在一个月内清收被占用资金，上交 所将对公司股票实施其他风险警示。若未能在六个月内清收被占用资金，上交所将对公司股票实施停 牌，停牌后两个月内仍未完成整改的，将对公司股票实施退市风险警示，此后两个月内仍未完成整改 的，将决定终止公司股票上市交易。 记者了解到，下一步监管机构将秉承"占用必偿还，整改有期限，退市不免责"原则，继续做好上市公司 持续监管，通过合规培训、案例警示等不断提高上市公司"关键少数"合规意识。同时，坚持强本强基、 严监严管，对上市公司财务造假、资金占用等违法违规行为绝不手软，以严格执法护航资本市场高质量 发展。 惩首恶 监管直指资金占用的始作俑者 *ST聆达被监管机构认定涉嫌资金占用 ...

8月26日晚间，又有2家上市公司因资金占用被监管处罚。 聆达集团股份有限公司（简称"*ST聆达（300125）"）关联方在归还全部占用资金、解除了违规担保 后，依旧收到大连证监局的行政处罚告知书，大连证监局拟对公司和相关责任人罚款500万元；山东新 华锦（600735）国际股份有限公司（简称"新华锦"）当晚披露的2025年半年报显示，公司存在资金占用 余额4.06亿元，被青岛证监局责令限期6个月整改。如公司未能在责令改正期限内完成整改，将被依规 启动规范类退市程序。 去年4月份发布的退市新规将大额资金占用未整改纳入规范类退市情形，"以退促改"推动上市公司解决 资金占用问题，截至目前，已经有8家公司通过多元方式解决了资金占用问题，清收金额合计超过80亿 元。 8月26日，因涉嫌资金占用、违规担保事项，大连证监局对*ST聆达作出《行政处罚事先告知书》，拟 对公司及时任董事长王明圣、副董事长林志煌合计罚款500万元。 *ST聆达通过采购预付款、在建工程、借款合同、银行承兑汇票贴现等方式向关联方转移资金，累计占 用金额6560万元，违规担保金额1.26亿元，严重侵害上市公司及中小股东合法权益。 大连证监局在日常监管中 ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：002586 证券简称：*ST围海 公告编号：2025-074 一、重要提示 本半年度报告摘要来自半年度报告全文，为全面了解本公司的经营成果、财务状况及未来发展规划，投 资者应当到证监会指定媒体仔细阅读半年度报告全文。 所有董事均已出席了审议本报告的董事会会议。 非标准审计意见提示 □适用 √不适用 董事会审议的报告期利润分配预案或公积金转增股本预案 □适用 √不适用 公司计划不派发现金红利，不送红股，不以公积金转增股本。 董事会决议通过的本报告期优先股利润分配预案 □适用 √不适用 公司是否需追溯调整或重述以前年度会计数据 □是 √否 ■ 3、公司股东数量及持股情况 单位：股 ■ 持股5%以上股东、前10名股东及前10名无限售流通股股东参与转融通业务出借股份情况 □适用 √不适用 前10名股东及前10名无限售流通股股东因转融通出借/归还原因导致较上期发生变化 □适用 √不适用 4、控股股东或实际控制人变更情况 控股股东报告期内变更 二、公司基本情况 1、公司简介 ■ 2、主要会计数据和财务指标 □适用 √不适用 公司报告期控股股东未发生变更。 实际 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company, Zhengping Road and Bridge Construction Co., Ltd., is facing significant operational challenges, including a negative audit report on internal controls for 2024, substantial uncertainty regarding its ability to continue operations, and instances of illegal guarantees, leading to its stock being placed under risk warning starting May 6, 2025 [1][2][3]. Group 1: Risk Warnings and Financial Issues - The company received a negative opinion on its internal control audit report for 2024, indicating serious operational issues [2][3]. - The company has been involved in illegal guarantees amounting to 35 million yuan, which have since been resolved [1][3]. - As of the end of 2024, the company reported a non-operating fund occupation of 17.55 million yuan by a minority shareholder, with a current balance of 4.21 million yuan after partial repayment [2][3]. Group 2: Measures and Progress - The company has taken steps to resolve the illegal guarantee issue by repaying the 35 million yuan loan to the bank, which has been cleared [3]. - To address the fund occupation issue, the company has conducted thorough investigations and is working to recover the remaining funds while enhancing internal controls [3][4]. - The company is actively seeking to stabilize its traditional business and expand into new areas to improve revenue and manage liquidity pressures related to temporarily unreturned fundraising of 190 million yuan [4][5]. Group 3: Internal Control Enhancements - The company has established an internal control working group to strengthen management and has initiated a comprehensive review of its internal control systems [5]. - New management procedures for project measurement and settlement have been implemented, along with enhanced communication between departments [5]. - The company is conducting special inspections on ongoing projects to continuously improve management standards [5].

Group 1 - The company Guangdong Quanwei Technology Co., Ltd. has disclosed a violation regarding a guarantee provided by its subsidiary Anhui Quanwei Green Energy Technology Co., Ltd. for a concrete procurement contract, which was not approved by the board or disclosed externally, constituting a procedural violation [1][2] - The company has identified this violation during the 2024 audit process and has previously disclosed related information in announcements [1] - The company is currently involved in a lawsuit regarding this guarantee, having appealed to the Intermediate People's Court of Suzhou City, Anhui Province, with the second trial hearing held on May 28, 2025 [1][2] Group 2 - In response to the violation, the company is actively urging responsible parties to rectify the situation and is tracking the progress of the case [2] - The company plans to enhance its internal control systems and measures, particularly regarding the approval and management of guarantees, to prevent future violations and protect the interests of all shareholders, especially minority shareholders [2]

Core Viewpoint - Gree Titanium New Energy Co., Ltd. has faced a judicial freeze on its 100% stake in Zhuhai Guangtong Automobile Co., Ltd. due to historical issues related to its former actual controller, Wei Yincang, who misused the company seal for unauthorized guarantees in December 2015 [1][2]. Group 1: Company Background - Gree Titanium New Energy was formerly known as Yinlong New Energy Co., Ltd., founded by Wei Yincang in 2009, focusing on lithium titanate battery technology, new energy vehicle manufacturing, and energy storage systems [2]. - Gree Electric Appliances acquired a 30.47% stake in Gree Titanium New Energy in 2021 and increased its stake to 55.01% by the end of 2023, holding 72.47% of voting rights [2]. Group 2: Judicial Freeze Details - The judicial freeze on Gree Titanium New Energy's stake in Guangtong Automobile is linked to Wei Yincang's unauthorized actions, which were not approved by the board of directors as per company regulations [2]. - The company plans to actively negotiate with the court and initiate legal proceedings to hold relevant parties accountable [2]. Group 3: Business Operations - Gree Titanium New Energy asserts that its business operations remain normal and that the equity freeze will not significantly impact its production and operations [3]. - The company has improved operational efficiency by adjusting production lines and optimizing order structures, with its new energy vehicles operating in over 240 cities nationwide [3].

Core Viewpoint - Gree Electric's subsidiary, Gree Titanium New Energy Co., Ltd., announced the freezing of its 100% stake in Zhuhai Guangtong Automobile Co., Ltd. due to legal issues stemming from past actions of its former controlling person, Wei Yincang [1] Group 1 - Gree Titanium's stake in Zhuhai Guangtong was frozen by the court [1] - The freezing is linked to a 2015 incident where Wei Yincang used the company's seal without board approval to guarantee an investment agreement with Sunshine Life [1] - Gree Titanium intends to pursue legal responsibility against the involved parties [1] - The company's operations remain normal despite the legal situation [1]