Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the United States' imposition of tariff barriers and trade bullying, stating that such actions are detrimental to both parties and violate economic principles and world trade norms, significantly impacting the global economic order and hindering economic recovery worldwide [1] Group 1: Economic Impact - The Chinese government acknowledges that the U.S. high tariffs will exert certain pressure on China's economy and foreign trade in the short term [1] - Despite the short-term pressures, the Chinese economy is expected to maintain a long-term positive trend due to its solid foundation, multiple advantages, strong resilience, and significant potential [1] Group 2: Response Measures - China is committed to implementing a series of countermeasures, which are deemed necessary not only for safeguarding its own development interests but also for upholding the multilateral trade system and the rules of the World Trade Organization [1] - The Chinese government expresses confidence in its ability to respond to external challenges and achieve its established development goals [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes the importance of resolving trade disputes through equal dialogue and negotiation, advocating for a cooperative international trade environment and adherence to WTO rules [1]. Group 1 - The U.S. President Trump announced a trade agreement with South Korea, imposing a 15% import tariff on South Korean goods [1]. - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Guo Jia Kun, responded to the announcement, reiterating China's stance on trade negotiations [1].

Group 1 - The G20 finance ministers and central bank governors recognize the significant role of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in promoting trade affairs [1] - The meeting acknowledged the established WTO rules that have been reached [1]

Group 1 - The foreign ministers of BRICS countries expressed serious concerns over the rise of unreasonable unilateral protectionist measures that are inconsistent with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules [1]