Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes China's strong opposition to Japan's recent remarks regarding Taiwan, asserting that such statements violate the political foundation of China-Japan relations and urging Japan to adhere to its commitments made in historical agreements [2][4]. Summary by Sections China-Japan Relations - China has reiterated its firm stance against Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's comments on Taiwan, stating that these remarks severely undermine the political foundation of China-Japan relations [2]. - The "Three Principles of Resuming Diplomatic Relations" proposed by China highlight that the People's Republic of China is the only legitimate government representing the Chinese people, Taiwan is an inseparable part of China's territory, and the so-called "Japan-Taiwan Treaty" is illegal and void [3]. Historical Agreements - The 1972 China-Japan Joint Communiqué established diplomatic relations and included three key points regarding Taiwan, affirming Japan's acknowledgment of the PRC as the sole legitimate government and its understanding of Taiwan as part of China [3]. - The 1978 Treaty of Peace and Friendship further confirmed the principles outlined in the Joint Communiqué, establishing a legal framework for China-Japan relations [3]. - In 1998, both countries reaffirmed their commitment to the principles regarding Taiwan, emphasizing Japan's intention to maintain only non-official relations with Taiwan [3]. Recent Developments - China has formally protested against Japan's provocative statements and demanded that Japan reflect on and correct its errors, ceasing to create incidents regarding China [5]. - The recent remarks by Japan's Prime Minister have led to the postponement of a joint public opinion survey between China and Japan, with the responsibility for this delay attributed to the provocative comments [7]. - China has urged Japan to take concrete actions to restore trust with its Asian neighbors and the international community, especially in light of rising tensions and dissatisfaction from surrounding countries regarding Japan's actions [8].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes recent statements made by Japanese politicians regarding Taiwan, asserting that such remarks violate the foundational political agreements between China and Japan and undermine bilateral relations [1][3]. Group 1: Historical Context - The normalization of diplomatic relations between China and Japan was established through the 1972 Joint Communiqué, which includes three key points regarding Taiwan [2]. - The 1978 Treaty of Peace and Friendship further solidified the principles outlined in the Joint Communiqué, confirming their legal standing in bilateral relations [2]. - In 1998, a joint declaration reaffirmed Japan's commitment to the stance on Taiwan as stated in the Joint Communiqué, limiting Japan's official relations with Taiwan [2]. Group 2: Current Stance and Responses - The Chinese Foreign Ministry has reiterated its position on the erroneous remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo, emphasizing that these statements contradict the spirit of the four political documents between China and Japan [1][3]. - The Chinese government calls on Japan to adhere to its historical commitments regarding Taiwan and to cease provocative actions that could escalate tensions [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes China's firm stance against Japan's recent remarks regarding Taiwan, asserting that such statements violate the political foundation of China-Japan relations and calling for Japan to adhere to its historical commitments [2][4]. Group 1: China's Position on Taiwan - China has reiterated its position on Taiwan, stating that the remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo are a serious violation of the spirit of the four political documents between China and Japan, fundamentally damaging the political foundation of bilateral relations [2][4]. - The "Three Principles for Resuming Diplomatic Relations" proposed by China include the recognition of the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate government representing the Chinese people, the assertion that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China, and the invalidation of the so-called "Japan-Taiwan Treaty" [2][4]. - The 1972 China-Japan Joint Communiqué established diplomatic relations and included three key points regarding Taiwan, emphasizing Japan's understanding and respect for China's position on Taiwan [2][3]. Group 2: Historical Agreements and Commitments - The 1978 Treaty of Peace and Friendship between China and Japan legally confirmed the principles outlined in the 1972 Joint Communiqué, establishing a legal framework for China-Japan relations [3]. - In 1998, both countries issued a joint declaration reaffirming Japan's commitment to adhere to the Taiwan-related positions stated in the 1972 Joint Communiqué, thereby eliminating any legal space for official relations with Taiwan [3]. - The 2008 Joint Declaration on Comprehensive Promotion of Strategic Mutual Benefit reiterated Japan's commitment to the Taiwan issue as stated in the 1972 Joint Communiqué, highlighting the binding nature of these commitments under international law [4]. Group 3: Recent Developments and Reactions - China has lodged a strong protest and serious diplomatic representations to Japan regarding the provocative remarks made by Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo, demanding immediate reflection and correction of these statements [5][6]. - The recent remarks have severely damaged the political foundation of China-Japan relations and have led to a deterioration of public sentiment between the two nations, necessitating a reevaluation of the conditions for joint public opinion surveys [6]. - Japan's recent actions have also drawn criticism from neighboring countries, prompting calls for Japan to reflect on its historical aggressions and to pursue a peaceful path in its international relations [7].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Foreign Ministry has reiterated its firm stance against recent remarks by Japanese politicians regarding Taiwan, emphasizing that such statements violate the foundational political agreements between China and Japan and harm bilateral relations [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Context - The 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Communiqué established diplomatic relations and included three key points regarding Taiwan, affirming Japan's understanding of China's "Three Principles" for normalization [2]. - The 1978 Treaty of Peace and Friendship between China and Japan legally confirmed the principles outlined in the Joint Communiqué, establishing a framework for peaceful relations [2]. - In 1998, both countries issued a joint declaration reaffirming Japan's commitment to the stance on Taiwan as stated in the Joint Communiqué, limiting Japan's official relations with Taiwan [2]. Group 2: Political Commitments - The 2008 Joint Declaration on Comprehensive Promotion of Strategic Mutual Benefit explicitly stated Japan's continued adherence to the position on Taiwan as outlined in the Joint Communiqué [3]. - The commitments made in the four political documents regarding Taiwan are binding under international law, leaving no room for misinterpretation or distortion [3]. - The Chinese government urges Japan to respect historical commitments and to cease provocative actions regarding Taiwan [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government has reiterated its firm stance against Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's remarks on Taiwan, emphasizing that such statements violate the spirit of the four political documents between China and Japan and fundamentally damage the political foundation of bilateral relations [1][3]. Summary by Sections Historical Context - The 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Communiqué established diplomatic relations, with three key points regarding Taiwan: Japan acknowledges the PRC as the sole legitimate government of China, recognizes Taiwan as an inseparable part of China, and understands the illegality of the so-called "Japan-Taiwan Treaty" [2]. Legal Framework - The 1978 Treaty of Peace and Friendship between China and Japan confirmed the principles of the Joint Communiqué as the legal basis for Sino-Japanese relations, mandating strict adherence to these principles [2]. - In 1998, both countries issued a joint declaration reaffirming Japan's commitment to the stance on Taiwan as outlined in the Joint Communiqué, thereby eliminating any legal space for official relations with Taiwan [2]. Current Stance - The 2008 Joint Declaration on Comprehensive Promotion of Strategic Mutual Benefit reiterated Japan's commitment to the stance on Taiwan as per the Joint Communiqué [3]. - The Chinese government insists that all Japanese political parties and leaders must adhere to Japan's commitments regarding Taiwan, urging Japan to act responsibly towards history and bilateral relations by retracting erroneous statements and actions [3].

Core Points - The article discusses the controversial remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan, linking it to Japan's "survival crisis" and suggesting potential military intervention, which has sparked significant backlash both domestically and internationally [1][2][3] Group 1: Political Context - The new security law passed in Japan in 2015 allows for collective self-defense, which many scholars argue violates Japan's constitution [1] - Takaichi's comments are seen as a significant shift in Japan's defense policy, potentially leading to increased military engagement in regional conflicts [2][3] Group 2: Domestic Reactions - Takaichi's statements have caused a stir within Japan, with critics arguing that they provoke China unnecessarily and could harm Japan's national interests [2][4] - Various political figures and groups in Japan have expressed concern over the implications of Takaichi's remarks, fearing a return to militarism [4][6] Group 3: International Relations - China's government has strongly condemned Takaichi's comments, viewing them as a violation of the One China principle and a challenge to China's core interests [3][7][8] - The diplomatic tensions have led to formal protests from China, indicating a deterioration in Sino-Japanese relations [5][7] Group 4: Historical Context - The article highlights the historical context of Japan's militaristic past and the need for Japan to reflect on its wartime actions, especially regarding Taiwan [4][8] - Experts emphasize that Japan's current trajectory could undermine the post-war international order established after World War II [4][5]