Group 1 - The UK, France, and Germany have officially notified the UN Security Council about the initiation of a "snapback sanctions" mechanism, which will restore sanctions on Iran if no resolution is passed to extend the sanctions waiver within 30 days [1] - Iran's permanent representative to the UN, Iravani, condemned the actions of the UK, France, and Germany as "illegal and politically motivated," asserting that Iran will respond decisively and proportionately [3] - Iravani emphasized that Iran is ready to engage in constructive cooperation with Security Council members committed to diplomacy, justice, and peace, but will not negotiate under threats and coercion [3] Group 2 - Iranians believe that the West uses the nuclear issue as a pretext to impose sanctions and hinder Iran's development, asserting that the peaceful use of nuclear energy is Iran's legitimate right [3][5] - Tehran residents expressed skepticism towards Western intentions, suggesting that Western countries aim to prevent Iran from benefiting from the nuclear deal and ensuring that Iranian interests are not met [5][6] - The sentiment among the Iranian public reflects a strong belief in their right to peaceful nuclear energy, which they argue is a right shared by all nations [6]

Group 1 - The E3 (UK, France, Germany) has initiated a 30-day UN procedure to reinstate sanctions against Iran, which may escalate tensions following recent bombings by Israel and the US [1][2] - E3's action is based on Iran's violations of the 2015 nuclear agreement, which aimed to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons in exchange for the lifting of sanctions [2][3] - The E3 has expressed a commitment to diplomatic solutions while also preparing to use the "snapback" sanctions mechanism if necessary [3] Group 2 - The UN procedure will take 30 days, after which sanctions targeting Iran's financial, banking, oil, gas, and defense sectors will be formally reinstated [5] - Russia and China have proposed a draft resolution to extend the 2015 nuclear agreement by six months and urge all parties to resume negotiations [5] - Domestic discontent in Iran is rising due to economic anxieties and political divisions, with hardliners advocating for resistance and moderates favoring diplomatic solutions [4][5]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a recent phone call between Chinese and Iranian deputy foreign ministers focusing on the Iranian nuclear issue, emphasizing the need for political and diplomatic solutions [1] Group 1: Diplomatic Engagement - Chinese Deputy Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu highlighted that the Iranian nuclear issue is at a critical juncture and expressed hope for all parties to resolve it through political and diplomatic means [1] - Ma Zhaoxu stated that China will maintain an objective and fair stance, actively promoting dialogue and negotiations, and will play a constructive role in this process [1] Group 2: Iranian Response - Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Ali Bagheri Kani appreciated China's significant contributions to the political and diplomatic resolution of the Iranian nuclear issue [1] - Bagheri Kani expressed Iran's willingness to continue strengthening communication and coordination with China [1]

Core Viewpoint - China opposes the activation of the UN Security Council's "rapid reinstatement of sanctions" mechanism regarding Iran, advocating for a political and diplomatic resolution to the Iran nuclear issue [1] Group 1: China's Position - China maintains that any actions by the UN Security Council should facilitate negotiations for a new agreement rather than hinder them [1] - The Chinese government emphasizes the importance of building trust and bridging differences among parties involved in the Iran nuclear discussions [1] Group 2: Diplomatic Efforts - China aims to play a constructive role in promoting dialogue and negotiations to resolve the Iran nuclear issue and uphold the international non-proliferation system [1] - The Chinese stance is to support peace and stability in the Middle East through diplomatic means [1]

Core Viewpoint - China maintains its stance on resolving the Iran nuclear issue through political and diplomatic means, opposing the activation of the UN Security Council's "snapback sanctions" mechanism [1] Group 1: China's Position on Iran Nuclear Issue - China opposes the UN Security Council's "snapback sanctions" mechanism, believing it does not help build trust or bridge differences among parties [1] - Any actions by the Security Council should facilitate negotiations for a new agreement rather than hinder them [1] - China aims to play a constructive role in promoting dialogue and negotiations to resolve the Iran nuclear issue and uphold the international non-proliferation system [1]

Core Viewpoint - China emphasizes the importance of resolving the Iran nuclear issue through political and diplomatic means, opposing the activation of the UN Security Council's "snapback sanctions" mechanism [1] Group 1: Diplomatic Stance - China maintains that the activation of the "snapback sanctions" mechanism is counterproductive to building trust and bridging differences among parties involved [1] - The Chinese government believes that any actions taken by the Security Council should facilitate negotiations for a new agreement rather than hinder them [1] Group 2: Commitment to Peace - China expresses its commitment to playing a constructive role in promoting dialogue and negotiations to resolve the Iran nuclear issue [1] - The aim is to uphold the international non-proliferation system and contribute to peace and stability in the Middle East [1]

Group 1 - The core point of the article highlights the ongoing communication between Trump and Putin, with a total of six calls this year, indicating a focus on bilateral relations and cooperation [1] - The discussions covered various topics including energy, AI, and the U.S. dollar, emphasizing the potential for "huge benefits" from future cooperation between the two countries [3] - The calls included agreements on the need for a long-term peaceful resolution to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, starting with a ceasefire in energy and infrastructure, and technical negotiations for a comprehensive ceasefire and permanent peace [4] Group 2 - In a call on May 19, 2025, the two leaders discussed the current state of U.S.-Russia relations and emphasized the importance of normalizing these relations, particularly focusing on the issue of prisoner exchanges [5] - A call on June 4, 2025, involved discussions about recent attacks on Russian airports by Ukraine and various incidents, as well as the Iranian nuclear issue [6] - The June 14, 2025 call addressed the escalating tensions between Israel and Iran, indicating ongoing geopolitical concerns in the region [7] - On July 3, 2025, the leaders exchanged views on bilateral relations, the Ukraine issue, and the situation in the Middle East, reflecting a broad range of diplomatic topics [8]

此访是伊朗6月暂停与国际原子能机构合作后，该机构高级官员首次到访。 以色列6月13日凌晨对伊朗实施大规模空袭后，以伊互相发动多轮袭击。美国于美东时间6月21日空 袭伊朗三处核设施，伊朗6月23日向美国驻卡塔尔的乌代德空军基地发起导弹袭击。6月24日，根据美方 宣布的时间表，以伊停火。伊朗议会6月25日通过法案，暂停伊朗与国际原子能机构的合作。 新华社德黑兰8月11日电 伊朗外交部长阿巴斯·阿拉格齐10日表示，国际原子能机构高级官员11日将 访伊。 阿拉格齐当天对媒体说，伊朗与国际原子能机构的会谈"将聚焦于一个新的合作框架"，在新框架达 成协议前，双方合作不会启动。在高级官员到访期间，不会为其安排对核设施的"检查或访问"。 阿拉格齐表示，伊朗与欧洲就核问题仍在继续接触，但下一轮谈判日期尚未确定。 ...

Group 1 - Iran is currently negotiating with the UK, France, and Germany regarding its nuclear issues, despite facing military threats from the US and Israel [1] - The negotiations with the European countries aim to address the UN sanctions against Iran, while previous talks with the US focused on American sanctions [2] - The outcome of the negotiations could potentially influence future discussions between Iran and the US, especially if the European demands align with those of the US and Israel [2] Group 2 - The negotiations are linked to the 2015 resolution that lifted UN sanctions on Iran, which could be reactivated by the UK, Germany, and France if no agreement is reached [2] - Iran has shown a willingness to return to the negotiating table to avoid UN sanctions, indicating a strategic shift in its diplomatic approach [2] - Progress has been noted in the talks, with the International Atomic Energy Agency expressing readiness to resume technical discussions with Iran, suggesting a possible concession from Iran [3]

Group 1 - The core point of the article revolves around the upcoming third round of trade negotiations between the US and China in Stockholm, which will also address China's oil purchases from Russia and Iran, indicating a shift towards incorporating geopolitical issues into economic discussions [1][3][4] - The US Treasury Secretary's comments suggest a strategy to use energy procurement as leverage in trade talks, aiming to pressure China into concessions in other areas [3][4][6] - China's response emphasizes the importance of keeping trade negotiations focused on economic issues, rejecting the inclusion of geopolitical matters such as oil procurement [4][6][9] Group 2 - The article highlights the significance of the trilateral meeting between China, Russia, and Iran, which underscores their collective stance on regional stability and fair international order amidst US sanctions and pressures [6][9] - The changing attitudes of the UK, France, and Germany towards Iran indicate a recognition that sanctions alone may not resolve the nuclear issue, reflecting a need for a more balanced approach that considers their own economic and energy interests [7][9] - The evolving international dynamics suggest that the interplay of geopolitical and economic interests is increasingly complex, with various nations reassessing their strategies in light of the US's unpredictable actions regarding Iran [7][9]