受贿犯罪
Search documents
受贿3068万余元,张效廉一审获刑12年
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2026-01-28 09:09
经审理查明:2007年至2023年,被告人张效廉利用担任黑龙江省哈尔滨市委副书记、市长,黑龙江省委常委、宣传部部长,十三届全国政协农业和农村委员 会副主任、经济委员会副主任等职务上的便利,以及职权或者地位形成的便利条件,为有关单位和个人在案件处理、企业经营、工作安排等事项上提供帮 助,直接或通过他人非法收受上述单位和个人给予的财物共计折合人民币3068万余元。 石家庄市中级人民法院认为,被告人张效廉的行为构成受贿罪,受贿数额特别巨大,应依法惩处。鉴于其到案后如实供述罪行,主动交代办案机关尚未掌握 的部分受贿事实,认罪悔罪,积极退赃,涉案赃款大部分已追缴,具有法定、酌定从轻处罚情节,依法可对其从轻处罚。法庭遂作出上述判决。 据悉,石家庄市中级人民法院于2025年11月21日公开开庭审理了该案。庭审中,检察机关出示了相关证据,被告人张效廉及其辩护人进行了质证,控辩双方 在法庭的主持下充分发表了意见,张效廉进行了最后陈述,并当庭表示认罪悔罪。人大代表、政协委员和各界群众30余人旁听了庭审。 2026年1月28日,河北省石家庄市中级人民法院一审公开宣判十三届全国政协经济委员会副主任张效廉受贿案,对被告人张效廉以受贿罪 ...
中国建设银行浙江省分行原党委书记、行长高强被开除党籍
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-23 10:09
高强身为国有金融机构党员领导干部,纪法意识淡漠,甘于被"围猎",在职期间以贷谋私、以股谋利, 离职后以"工资""顾问费"等名义敛财,搞银企"旋转门"式腐败,严重违反党的政治纪律、组织纪律、廉 洁纪律、生活纪律,构成严重职务违法并涉嫌受贿犯罪,且在党的十八大、十九大后不收敛、不收手, 甚至在党的二十大后仍不知止,性质严重、影响恶劣,应予严肃处理。依据《中国共产党纪律处分条 例》《中华人民共和国监察法》《中华人民共和国公职人员政务处分法》等有关规定,经中国建设银行 党委研究,决定给予高强开除党籍处分;收缴其违纪违法所得;北京市通州区监委将其涉嫌犯罪问题移 送检察机关依法审查起诉,所涉财物一并移送。 (中央纪委国家监委驻中国建设银行纪检监察组、北京市纪委监委) 责任编辑:王馨茹 中央纪委国家监委网站讯据中央纪委国家监委驻中国建设银行纪检监察组、北京市纪委监委消息:日 前,中央纪委国家监委驻中国建设银行纪检监察组、北京市通州区监委对中国建设银行浙江省分行原党 委书记、行长高强严重违纪违法问题进行了立案审查调查。 中央纪委国家监委网站讯据中央纪委国家监委驻中国建设银行纪检监察组、北京市纪委监委消息:日 前,中央纪委国家 ...
三堂会审丨准确认定违反廉洁纪律和受贿犯罪
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2026-01-07 02:40
中央纪委国家监委网站 方弈霏 编者按 工程建设领域资金密集、资源富集、环节众多,腐败问题易发多发。实践中,有的党员领导干部利用职权帮助亲属或特定关系人承揽工程项目,有的与不法 商人结成利益共同体,以合作投资项目名义获得"分红",还有的把项目审批权异化为以权谋私的工具向商人老板索贿,严重扰乱公平公正的市场秩序,损害 群众切身利益,必须以零容忍态度依规依纪依法严肃查处,正本清源。本期案例中,刘某某利用职权或者职务上的影响为特定关系人打招呼承接工程项目, 未从中收受好处,应怎样定性?刘某某要求请托人免除其妻子租赁的商铺租金,为何认定构成受贿?刘某某在办成请托事项收受好处后继续收受请托人所送 节礼,是否一并计入受贿数额?刘某某利用职务便利帮助他人承揽工程项目,在无实际出资和参与管理经营的情况下收受项目"分红",并将部分"分红"交由 行贿人保管,构成受贿未遂还是既遂?我们特邀相关单位工作人员予以解析。 刘旸 南京江北新区人民检察院第一检察部检察官助理 徐子敬 南京江北新区人民法院刑事审判庭副庭长 基本案情: 刘某某,男,2000年8月加入中国共产党,曾任A市B区管委会规划建设处处长、规划建设局局长,A市某园区党委书记, ...
辽宁省营口市政协原副主席段绪华被双开
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-19 14:22
Core Viewpoint - The investigation into Duan Xuhua, former vice chairman of the Yingkou Municipal Political Consultative Conference, reveals serious violations of party discipline and law, leading to severe disciplinary actions and criminal prosecution [1] Summary by Relevant Sections Investigation Findings - Duan Xuhua lost his ideals and beliefs, betrayed his original mission, and was disloyal to the party, resisting organizational scrutiny [1] - He violated the spirit of the Central Eight Regulations by illegally accepting gifts and money [1] - He failed to report personal matters as required, purchased property below market value, and imposed fees on private business owners, damaging the business environment [1] Violations and Disciplinary Actions - Duan Xuhua interfered in market economic activities and improperly arranged for subordinates to pay excessive public reception expenses [1] - He utilized his position to seek benefits for others in business operations and illegally accepted property [1] - His actions constituted severe violations of political, organizational, integrity, mass, and work discipline, leading to serious job-related offenses and suspected bribery [1] Consequences - The decision was made to expel Duan Xuhua from the party and remove him from public office, confiscate his illegal gains, and transfer his suspected criminal activities to the prosecution [1]
中信银行资产管理业务中心原副总裁罗金辉一审被判十二年九个月
Bei Jing Ri Bao Ke Hu Duan· 2025-12-11 09:25
Core Points - The case involves the sentencing of Luo Jinhui, former Vice President of the Asset Management Business Center of CITIC Bank, for bribery, receiving a prison sentence of 12 years and 9 months along with a fine of 2 million RMB [1] - Luo Jinhui was found guilty of accepting bribes totaling over 44.37 million RMB from 2014 to 2020 while holding senior positions in various banks, including China Industrial Bank and Bank of Communications [3] - The court acknowledged Luo's confession and cooperation during the investigation, which contributed to a lighter sentence despite the significant amount of bribery [5] Company Summary - Luo Jinhui held key positions in major banks, including CITIC Bank, where he utilized his authority to facilitate financing and stock transactions for enterprises and individuals [3] - The court's decision reflects the legal consequences of corruption within the banking sector, emphasizing the importance of integrity in financial institutions [5] - The case highlights the potential risks associated with senior management positions in banks, where the misuse of power can lead to significant legal repercussions [3][5]
袁光宇,受贿数额特别巨大
Bei Jing Ri Bao Ke Hu Duan· 2025-12-11 06:48
转自:北京日报客户端 据最高人民检察院12月11日消息,中国海洋石油集团有限公司原党组成员、副总经理袁光宇涉嫌受贿一 案,由国家监察委员会调查终结,移送检察机关审查起诉。经最高人民检察院指定管辖,江苏省人民检 察院依法以涉嫌受贿罪对袁光宇作出逮捕决定。 近日,江苏省徐州市人民检察院已向徐州市中级人民法院提起公诉。 检察机关起诉指控:被告人袁光宇利用担任中海石油北方钻井公司总经理,中海油田服务有限公司总经 理、总裁,中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司总经理,中国海洋石油渤海石油管理局局长,中国海 洋石油有限公司执行副总裁、总裁等职务上的便利,为有关单位和个人谋取利益,非法收受他人财物, 数额特别巨大,依法应当以受贿罪追究其刑事责任。 无视中央八项规定精神,接受可能影响公正执行公务的打高尔夫球活动安排; 在职务晋升方面为他人谋取利益; 搞钱色交易,退休后违规从事与原任职务管辖业务相关的营利活动、违规任职; 毫无纪法底线,肆无忌惮"靠石油吃石油",大搞权钱交易,利用职务便利为他人在项目承揽、企业经营 等方面谋利,并非法收受巨额财物。 中央纪委国家监委表示,袁光宇严重违反党的政治纪律、组织纪律、廉洁纪律和生活纪律,构 ...
三堂会审丨从严纠治违规接待 准确认定受贿犯罪
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2025-12-10 00:18
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the case of Guo, a former director of a supply and marketing cooperative, who is implicated in serious violations of party regulations, including excessive hospitality and corruption, leading to his expulsion from the party and criminal prosecution for bribery and embezzlement [1][5]. Summary by Sections Basic Case Facts - Guo joined the Communist Party in April 2003 and held various positions, including director of the supply and marketing cooperative in B Town, A County. In 2022, during the liquidation of the cooperative, it was found that Guo had not performed his duties adequately, leading to his dismissal [2][3]. Violations of Regulations - From October 2020 to July 2021, the cooperative, under Guo's direction, violated regulations by providing cigarettes and high-end alcohol during business receptions, totaling 18,800 yuan. Guo is directly responsible for these actions [3][11][14]. Criminal Charges - Guo is charged with bribery for accepting 1,142,000 yuan from a real estate company between 2005 and 2009, and embezzlement for misappropriating 627,000 yuan of public funds from 2015 to 2017, which he later returned [3][5][17]. Investigation and Disciplinary Actions - The A County Discipline Inspection Commission initiated an investigation on July 19, 2024, leading to Guo's expulsion from the party on September 27, 2024, and subsequent criminal prosecution for bribery and embezzlement [4][5]. Court Proceedings - On June 6, 2025, the A County People's Court sentenced Guo to five years in prison and imposed fines totaling 200,000 yuan for his crimes, with the judgment already in effect [6]. Definition of State Staff - The article discusses whether Guo qualifies as a state worker, concluding that he is considered a public servant due to his appointed role in the cooperative, which was managed under state guidelines [7][10]. Misconduct in Hospitality - The cooperative's management established strict rules against excessive hospitality, which Guo violated by approving inappropriate expenses during receptions, reflecting a broader issue of misconduct in public service [11][12][13]. Calculation of Bribery Amounts - Guo's acceptance of bribes was calculated at 1,142,000 yuan, with the article explaining that returning funds after being investigated does not negate the crime of bribery [15][18].
受贿11.08亿余元!白天辉被执行死刑
中国基金报· 2025-12-09 04:27
来源:人民日报客户端 原中国华融国际控股有限公司总经理白天辉被执行死刑 les & FR 点击下载中国基金报客户端 ■ 中国基金报内容矩阵 ■ 巅峰对话 投资热点说 ETF风向标 IPO情报站 fe o 1 ■ a a - 444 and 4 4 CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND 开盘速递 港股日报 全球早班车 数说人物 √ � [ 8 a 4 a g a d 4 4 4 CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND ●微信搜一搜( 〔 〔 中国基金报 〕即刻获取财经资讯 202 4 年 5 月 28 日, 天津市第二 中级人民法院以 受贿 罪判处 被告人白天辉 死刑,剥夺 政治权利终身,并处没收个人全部财产。 白天辉 上诉后, 天津市 高级人民法院 经开庭审 理,于 2025年2月24日 裁定驳回上诉,维持 原判 ,并 依法 报请最高人民法院核准。 最高人民法院经复核确认: 2014年至2018年,被告人白天辉利用担任华融(香港)国际控 股有限公司业务拓展三部负责人、总经理、投资银行部董事总经理,中国 华融国际 控股有限 公司资 ...
上海市委原常委朱芝松,被提起公诉
证券时报· 2025-11-11 05:02
Core Points - The article reports on the case of Zhu Zhison, a former member of the Shanghai Municipal Committee and former Secretary of the Pudong New Area Committee, who is suspected of bribery and has been arrested by the Supreme People's Procuratorate [1] Summary by Sections - Zhu Zhison's case has been investigated by the National Supervisory Commission and has been transferred to the procuratorial organs for review and prosecution [1] - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has made an arrest decision against Zhu Zhison for suspected bribery and has designated the Nanchang Municipal People's Procuratorate to handle the case [1] - The Nanchang Municipal People's Procuratorate has filed a public prosecution with the Nanchang Intermediate People's Court [1] - During the review and prosecution stage, the procuratorial organs informed Zhu Zhison of his litigation rights and conducted an interrogation, considering the opinions of his defense counsel [1] - The prosecution accuses Zhu Zhison of using his various official positions to seek benefits for others and illegally accepting substantial amounts of property, which is considered particularly large in scale [1]
青海省委原常委、政法委原书记杨发森受贿案一审宣判
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-10-29 09:18
Core Points - The court sentenced Yang Fasen, former member of the Qinghai Provincial Committee and Secretary of the Political and Legal Committee, to life imprisonment for bribery, confiscating all personal property and depriving him of political rights for life [1][3] - Yang Fasen was found guilty of accepting bribes totaling over 147 million RMB (approximately 21 million USD) from 2005 to 2024 while holding various governmental positions [3] Summary by Sections - **Judicial Outcome** - Yang Fasen received a life sentence for bribery, with all personal assets confiscated and political rights revoked for life [1] - The court acknowledged mitigating factors such as the attempted bribery and voluntary confession, leading to a lighter sentence [3] - **Bribery Details** - The total amount of bribes accepted by Yang Fasen was over 147 million RMB [3] - His positions allowed him to facilitate contracts and business operations for various enterprises and individuals [3] - **Court Proceedings** - The trial was held publicly on September 12, 2025, with evidence presented by the prosecution and defense [3] - Approximately 20 members of the public attended the court session [3]