要点概览： 可奖励案件条件从罚没款金额10万元提升为100万元 奖励金额由案件罚没款金额1%提升为3%。提供重大违法行为线索的，奖金上限也从10万元提升为50万 元 提供的案件线索在全国范围内有重大影响，或者涉案数额特别巨大，或者吹哨人为内部知情人员的，每 案奖金上限从30万元、60万元统一提升至100万元 明确吹哨人登记确认期限为3个月 炒股就看金麒麟分析师研报，权威，专业，及时，全面，助您挖掘潜力主题机会！ 证监会9月30日消息，为深入贯彻党中央、国务院决策部署，进一步完善举报制度，有效回应市场关 切，弘扬公正担当的吹哨人文化，更好适应资本市场高质量发展和监管执法工作要求，结合举报工作实 践，中国证监会会同财政部修订完善了《证券期货违法违规行为举报工作暂行规定》，形成了《证券期 货违法行为吹哨人奖励工作规定（征求意见稿）》，并向社会公开征求意见。 征求意见稿较大幅度提高奖励标准。提高奖金比例，奖励金额由案件罚没款金额1%提升为3%。提供重 大违法行为线索的，奖金上限也从10万元提升为50万元。提供的案件线索在全国范围内有重大影响，或 者涉案数额特别巨大，或者吹哨人为内部知情人员的，每案奖金上限从30万元、 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights serious food safety violations in a ghost kitchen operating in Shanghai, revealing unsanitary conditions and improper food handling practices that pose risks to consumer health [1][2][4]. Group 1: Food Safety Violations - The kitchen was found to have a foul odor, with unsanitary conditions including raw and cooked food being stored together, and staff handling food without proper hygiene measures such as gloves and masks [1][2]. - The kitchen's layout was inadequate, with nine food stalls separated by makeshift barriers, leading to cross-contamination risks [2]. - The local market supervision authority intervened, sealing all food items and initiating an investigation into the establishment's operating credentials [2]. Group 2: Business Model and Profitability - The ghost kitchen operated multiple storefronts on food delivery platforms, with one dish priced at 27.8 yuan, discounted to 12.8 yuan, achieving monthly sales of over 400 orders on a single platform [3]. - Each stall reportedly earned between 12,000 to 15,000 yuan monthly, with a profit-sharing model that eliminated rent costs, relying instead on shared expenses for ingredients and utilities [3]. - The business model involved frequently changing names and storefronts to evade scrutiny, akin to the "shared kitchen" concept that exploits regulatory loopholes [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Challenges and Recommendations - The incident underscores systemic regulatory issues within the food delivery industry, necessitating stricter enforcement of food safety regulations and real-world verification of vendors by platforms [4]. - Experts suggest implementing a whistleblower reward system to encourage reporting of violations by delivery personnel and consumers, alongside imposing hefty fines on platforms that overlook non-compliance [4]. - The article calls for a collective responsibility approach to food safety, emphasizing the need for rigorous platform audits and active consumer participation in safeguarding food quality [4].