Core Viewpoint - The article highlights serious hygiene violations in a ghost kitchen operating in Shanghai, revealing the risks associated with food safety in the delivery industry [1][6][9]. Group 1: Hygiene Violations - The kitchen was found to have unsanitary conditions, including the presence of flies and improper handling of food, with staff not wearing masks or gloves [5][6]. - Raw and cooked food items were mixed together without proper separation, violating food safety regulations [6][9]. Group 2: Business Model - The establishment operates multiple ghost kitchens under different names, utilizing a shared kitchen model to minimize costs and maximize profits [7]. - Each kitchen reportedly earns between 12,000 to 15,000 yuan per month, with a sales volume of over 400 orders on a single platform [7]. Group 3: Regulatory Issues - The incident underscores broader regulatory challenges within the food delivery industry, emphasizing the need for stricter oversight and verification of food service providers [9]. - Experts suggest implementing a whistleblower reward system to encourage reporting of violations and imposing heavy fines on platforms that overlook non-compliance [9].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights serious food safety violations in a ghost kitchen operating in Shanghai, revealing unsanitary conditions and improper food handling practices that pose risks to consumer health [1][2][4]. Group 1: Food Safety Violations - The kitchen was found to have a foul odor, with unsanitary conditions including raw and cooked food being stored together, and staff handling food without proper hygiene measures such as gloves and masks [1][2]. - The kitchen's layout was inadequate, with nine food stalls separated by makeshift barriers, leading to cross-contamination risks [2]. - The local market supervision authority intervened, sealing all food items and initiating an investigation into the establishment's operating credentials [2]. Group 2: Business Model and Profitability - The ghost kitchen operated multiple storefronts on food delivery platforms, with one dish priced at 27.8 yuan, discounted to 12.8 yuan, achieving monthly sales of over 400 orders on a single platform [3]. - Each stall reportedly earned between 12,000 to 15,000 yuan monthly, with a profit-sharing model that eliminated rent costs, relying instead on shared expenses for ingredients and utilities [3]. - The business model involved frequently changing names and storefronts to evade scrutiny, akin to the "shared kitchen" concept that exploits regulatory loopholes [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Challenges and Recommendations - The incident underscores systemic regulatory issues within the food delivery industry, necessitating stricter enforcement of food safety regulations and real-world verification of vendors by platforms [4]. - Experts suggest implementing a whistleblower reward system to encourage reporting of violations by delivery personnel and consumers, alongside imposing hefty fines on platforms that overlook non-compliance [4]. - The article calls for a collective responsibility approach to food safety, emphasizing the need for rigorous platform audits and active consumer participation in safeguarding food quality [4].