Core Viewpoint - The Central Comprehensive Law-based Governance Committee Office announced the third batch of national law-based government construction demonstration regions and projects, including 72 demonstration cities (counties, districts) and 33 demonstration projects aimed at innovating grassroots social governance [1][1][1] Group 1: Demonstration Regions and Projects - The list includes cities such as Shijingshan District in Beijing and Gongzhuling City in Jilin Province [1] - The demonstration projects feature initiatives like the "Six-Foot Alley Work Method" in Tongcheng City, Anhui Province, which aims to innovate grassroots social governance [1] Group 2: Implementation Process - The third batch of demonstration creation activities was initiated in May 2023, following a process that includes voluntary application, provincial preliminary review, third-party evaluation, public satisfaction assessment, and social announcement [1][1][1] - The initiative has been ongoing since 2019, with batches released every two years to progressively promote and establish exemplary models of law-based government construction [1]

为深入学习贯彻习近平法治思想，不断把法治政府建设向纵深推进，加快实现法治政府建设率先突破， 自2019年起，中央依法治国办组织开展全国法治政府建设示范创建活动，每两年一批，梯次推进、辐射 带动，树立一批批新时代法治政府建设的典范标杆，营造法治政府建设创优争先的浓厚氛围。 2023年5月，中央依法治国办启动了第三批全国法治政府建设示范创建活动。根据《关于开展第三批全 国法治政府建设示范创建活动的实施方案》和《市县法治政府建设示范指标体系》（2023年版），按照 客观公正、公开透明、务求实效、为基层减负的原则，通过自愿申报、省级初审、第三方评估、人民群 众满意度测评、社会公示等程序，经报中央依法治国委批准，决定对第三批全国法治政府建设示范地区 和项目予以命名。 获得示范命名的地区要坚持以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导，深入学习贯彻党的二十大和 二十届历次全会精神，全面贯彻习近平法治思想，珍惜荣誉、再接再厉，持续巩固深化示范创建成果， 进一步探索创新、构建长效机制，不断为建设更高水平的法治政府创造可复制可推广的新鲜经验。希望 各地区以先进典型为标杆，以示范创建为抓手，聚焦法治政府建设关键环节，聚焦解决人民群 ...

为深入学习贯彻习近平法治思想，不断把法治政府建设向纵深推进，加快实现法治政府建设率先突破， 自2019年起，中央依法治国办组织开展全国法治政府建设示范创建活动，每两年一批，梯次推进、辐射 带动，树立一批批新时代法治政府建设的典范标杆，营造法治政府建设创优争先的浓厚氛围。 2023年5月，中央依法治国办启动了第三批全国法治政府建设示范创建活动。根据《关于开展第三批全 国法治政府建设示范创建活动的实施方案》和《市县法治政府建设示范指标体系》（2023年版），按照 客观公正、公开透明、务求实效、为基层减负的原则，通过自愿申报、省级初审、第三方评估、人民群 众满意度测评、社会公示等程序，经报中央依法治国委批准，决定对第三批全国法治政府建设示范地区 和项目予以命名。 2025年10月19日 附件 第三批全国法治政府建设示范地区和项目名单 （按行政区划排列） 一、全国法治政府建设示范市（县、区）（72个） 北京市石景山区 北京市顺义区 获得示范命名的地区要坚持以习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想为指导，深入学习贯彻党的二十大和 二十届历次全会精神，全面贯彻习近平法治思想，珍惜荣誉、再接再厉，持续巩固深化示范创建成果， 进一 ...

Core Points - The conference emphasized the importance of constructing an independent knowledge system for administrative law in China to enhance governance and legal confidence [1][2] - The meeting highlighted the need for reforms in administrative litigation to improve the accessibility and effectiveness of legal remedies for administrative subjects [2][3] - The discussion included the necessity of addressing various issues in law enforcement and judicial practices, such as non-action and improper actions by law enforcement agencies [4][5] Group 1: Conference Overview - The annual meeting of the Administrative Law Research Association focused on deepening reforms and building a rule-of-law government [1] - The meeting marked the 40th anniversary of the association, reflecting on its achievements and discussing the historical mission of administrative law in the new era [1] Group 2: Legislative and Institutional Reforms - The upcoming National People's Congress meeting will review the draft of the Public Interest Litigation Law, which aims to enhance legal supervision in governance [3] - The need for a systematic approach to supervising administrative violations was emphasized, particularly in light of the recent reforms initiated by the 20th National Congress [3] Group 3: Current Issues in Law Enforcement - The conference addressed ongoing issues in law enforcement, including excessive administrative checks and the need for better protection of new employment groups' rights [4][5] - A nationwide campaign to standardize administrative enforcement has led to a significant reduction in administrative inspections, with a reported 30% decrease in inspections from January to August [4][5]

Core Points - The enforcement inspection team emphasizes the importance of implementing the Administrative Review Law effectively in the province, focusing on key legal provisions to enhance the quality and efficiency of administrative review work [1][2] - The team conducted inspections in six cities, utilizing various methods to understand the implementation status and identify prominent issues, aiming to improve public trust and satisfaction in administrative reviews [1] Group 1 - The enforcement inspection team acknowledges the achievements in implementing the Administrative Review Law and provides targeted suggestions for identified issues and weaknesses [1] - The team stresses the need for a high-quality, professional administrative review workforce to meet the demands of legal implementation [2] - The team highlights the importance of collaboration and coordination among departments to strengthen the enforcement of the Administrative Review Law [2] Group 2 - The team calls for the establishment of a robust evaluation mechanism for administrative review work and encourages public supervision to address social concerns promptly [2] - The team advocates for legal education and awareness to foster a culture of lawfulness in society, providing a strong legal guarantee for revitalization and development [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the interdependence of reform and rule of law, highlighting the need for comprehensive legal reforms to enhance governance capabilities and stimulate development in Liaoning [1][2] - Comprehensive reform is identified as a crucial strategy for achieving overall revitalization in Liaoning, requiring the breaking of existing interest patterns and reliance on the rule of law to resolve conflicts and reduce reform risks [1][2] - Strengthening the legal environment and optimizing the business environment are essential for addressing complex challenges and maintaining social stability, thus driving development momentum [1][2] Group 2 - The construction of a rule-of-law government is prioritized, focusing on clarifying responsibilities, regulating government decision-making, and enhancing regulatory services to better combine effective markets with proactive government [2] - Fairness and justice are highlighted as the lifelines of the rule of law, necessitating continuous judicial reforms to ensure equitable access to the benefits of development for all citizens [2][3] - The promotion of legal awareness and education is crucial for building a law-abiding society, with an emphasis on grassroots conflict resolution and the establishment of a modern public legal service system [3] Group 3 - The current year marks the conclusion of the 14th Five-Year Plan, necessitating a problem-oriented approach to deepen legal reforms and provide solid legal guarantees for comprehensive revitalization [3]

Core Viewpoint - The case represents a significant step in promoting legal governance and accountability within the government, showcasing the mayor's commitment to transparency and the rule of law [1][2] Group 1: Case Details - The case involves a citizen, Li, who contested a land compensation decision made by the Wudang Mountain Tourism Economic Special Zone Management Committee, leading to an administrative lawsuit after the city government rejected his appeal [1] - This is the first instance in Shiyan City where the mayor, Wang Yonghui, appeared in court as the head of the administrative agency to respond to the lawsuit [1] Group 2: Government's Response and Legal Implications - Wang Yonghui emphasized the importance of administrative litigation in safeguarding the rights of citizens and ensuring that administrative agencies operate within the law [1] - The city government aims to enhance the legal decision-making process and reduce administrative disputes by fostering a culture of legal awareness among its leaders [1][2] Group 3: Judicial System and Administrative Accountability - The Shiyan courts have achieved a 100% appearance rate of administrative agency heads in court, indicating a strong commitment to resolving administrative disputes effectively [2] - The implementation of mechanisms such as open dispute resolution and the integration of administrative case handling has improved the resolution of administrative and civil disputes [2]

Core Points - The Yellow River Water Resources Commission has officially issued the "Guidelines for the Legality Review of Major Decision-Making Matters" marking a new phase of institutionalization, standardization, and normalization in legality review of major administrative decisions [1][2] - The guidelines aim to support ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River basin by implementing legal governance and standardizing administrative decision-making [1] Summary by Sections Legality Review Mechanism - The guidelines establish a comprehensive and efficient legality review mechanism focusing on the principles of "review all that should be reviewed, advance the review process, standardize procedures, and ensure legality" [1] - The review scope is comprehensive, ensuring that all decision-making matters submitted for meetings are included in the legality review, with specific exceptions for emergency responses, personnel matters, and party discipline [1] Review Focus and Elements - The review process emphasizes three core elements: authority, procedure, and content, ensuring that decisions comply with legal authority, necessary procedures, and national laws and policies [1][2] Submission Process and Efficiency - The guidelines specify the submission materials required for review, including a submission letter, decision draft, explanatory notes, and legal basis compilation, addressing issues of procedural rigor, time constraints, and quality stability [2] - The guidelines promote the use of digital tools, such as the "National Laws and Regulations Database," to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of the legality review process, contributing to the digital transformation of legal work [2] Legal Governance Enhancement - The implementation of the guidelines is a critical step for the Yellow River Water Resources Commission in advancing comprehensive legal governance and enhancing the level of government legal work [2]

Group 1 - The article highlights the reduction of frequent inspections by various law enforcement agencies, allowing companies to focus more on production and operations [1] - The transformation is attributed to Sichuan's continuous efforts to deepen the rule of law and optimize the business environment, particularly during the critical period of the "14th Five-Year Plan" and the preparation for the "15th Five-Year Plan" [1] - The establishment of legal service workstations in industrial parks aims to provide targeted legal support to private enterprises, enhancing their operational efficiency [2] Group 2 - Sichuan has built 48 public legal service centers and 50 complaint service stations in industrial parks, covering over 100,000 enterprises [2] - The "Tianfu Enterprise Code" is being implemented to improve transparency in enterprise inspections, with a trial phase running until March 31 of the following year [4] - The province has collected over 1,400 clues related to administrative law violations and has corrected more than 1,300 issues, aiming to standardize administrative law enforcement [4] Group 3 - The new public legal service center in Sichuan integrates 13 legal service projects, allowing for one-stop processing of various legal needs [5] - Over 20,900 "legal understanders" are actively promoting legal awareness and participating in grassroots governance [6] - The province has established 216 public legal service centers and integrated legal services into community centers, addressing the imbalance of legal resources [6] Group 4 - The judicial administration system has facilitated the resolution of nearly 50,000 disputes since April, contributing to social stability [7] - Innovative measures such as the "Returning Goose Plan" and "Three-Color Work Method" have been introduced to enhance community correction efforts [7] - The article emphasizes the importance of grassroots governance and the role of legal services in maintaining social harmony [8]

Core Insights - The report highlights the effectiveness of administrative trials in enhancing public trust in the government and the rule of law, with a total of 314,000 administrative cases accepted and 304,000 concluded since 2020 [1] - The courts have actively supported the establishment of a law-based business environment, handling 16,000 first-instance administrative cases related to enterprises and publishing typical cases to optimize the business environment [1] - The report emphasizes the importance of addressing public concerns in administrative cases, with a focus on areas such as food safety, land contracts, and social security, achieving a 25.1% mediation and withdrawal rate in administrative cases over the past three years [2] Group 1 - The provincial courts have maintained a high efficiency in administrative trials, with 138,000 first-instance and 56,000 second-instance administrative cases concluded [1] - The courts have adjudicated 68,000 cases in key areas such as natural resources, housing construction, and environmental protection, supporting effective government administration [1] - The report indicates a strong commitment to resolving administrative disputes through mediation, with significant efforts made to ensure that administrative agencies act within the law [2] Group 2 - The report notes a high participation rate of administrative agency heads in court proceedings, with a 100% appearance rate in enterprise-related cases, leading to the resolution of over 40,000 disputes in the past five years [2] - The approach of linking government and court actions has been pivotal in promoting a higher level of legal governance, transitioning from mere appearances in court to substantive dispute resolution [2] - The focus on administrative cases related to public welfare has been crucial in addressing urgent issues faced by the community, ensuring that citizens feel the warmth of judicial support [2]