今年3月以来，根据中央统一部署，规范涉企执法专项行动在全国范围内全面展开。周伦军介绍，最高人民法院党组高度重视，结合司法审判工作实际细化 具体安排，聚焦重点难点任务，做深做实平等保护，从严从实纠治问题。 周伦军称，今年以来，最高法院先后发布6个企业名誉权司法保护典型案例、8个反不正当竞争典型案例、5个反垄断典型案例。发布5个促进民营经济发展典 型刑事案例、12个依法平等保护民营企业和企业家合法权益典型案例、4个涉民营企业产权和民营企业家合法权益保护再审典型案例，今年9月，最高人民法 院、司法部联合发布10个规范涉企执法司法行政复议、行政诉讼典型案例。这些案例，既是专项行动的部分成果展示，也是明晰相关裁判标准，做实依法平 等保护民营企业合法权益，稳定法治预期，提振发展信心的具体工作举措。 此外，周伦军还提到，人民法院加强府院联动，大力推进清理政府机关、事业单位拖欠中小企业账款工作，今年1月至9月初，共结案9166件，执行到位账款 311.42亿余元。严格落实"背靠背"条款司法解释、防止大型企业凭借优势地位"以大欺小"，依法制止有关主体滥用市场支配地位挤压中小企业生存发展空 间，积极营造统一开放、竞争有序的市场环 ...

Core Points - The conference emphasized the importance of constructing an independent knowledge system for administrative law in China to enhance governance and legal confidence [1][2] - The meeting highlighted the need for reforms in administrative litigation to improve the accessibility and effectiveness of legal remedies for administrative subjects [2][3] - The discussion included the necessity of addressing various issues in law enforcement and judicial practices, such as non-action and improper actions by law enforcement agencies [4][5] Group 1: Conference Overview - The annual meeting of the Administrative Law Research Association focused on deepening reforms and building a rule-of-law government [1] - The meeting marked the 40th anniversary of the association, reflecting on its achievements and discussing the historical mission of administrative law in the new era [1] Group 2: Legislative and Institutional Reforms - The upcoming National People's Congress meeting will review the draft of the Public Interest Litigation Law, which aims to enhance legal supervision in governance [3] - The need for a systematic approach to supervising administrative violations was emphasized, particularly in light of the recent reforms initiated by the 20th National Congress [3] Group 3: Current Issues in Law Enforcement - The conference addressed ongoing issues in law enforcement, including excessive administrative checks and the need for better protection of new employment groups' rights [4][5] - A nationwide campaign to standardize administrative enforcement has led to a significant reduction in administrative inspections, with a reported 30% decrease in inspections from January to August [4][5]

Group 1 - The construction of a national unified market is essential for enhancing China's comparative advantages and scale effects, thereby increasing economic growth potential [1][2] - The new development pattern emphasizes domestic circulation as the mainstay, which involves smooth supply-demand cycles and the establishment of a unified market to boost demand and improve supply quality and resilience of industrial and supply chains [2][3] Group 2 - The Central Economic Committee has made specific deployments focusing on six key areas, including regulating low-price disorderly competition among enterprises and promoting the integration of domestic and foreign trade [2][4] - The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) has established guidelines to create a set of universal action rules and behavior norms for the unified market, clarifying the boundaries of power and the "bottom line" for various regions and departments [3][4] Group 3 - The automotive industry is experiencing a decline in profit margins, with projections indicating a drop to 4.3% in 2024 and further to 3.9% in the first quarter of 2025, which is below the manufacturing average [5] - The ongoing price wars and "involution" competition in the automotive sector are leading to decreased efficiency across the supply chain, which could undermine research and development capabilities and raise quality concerns [7][8] Group 4 - Multiple departments are intensifying efforts to address "involution" competition, aiming to foster effective competition, technological innovation, and market expansion [9][10] - The NDRC is committed to addressing structural issues in key industries through targeted policies and measures, promoting healthy development and quality upgrades [10][11] Group 5 - The ongoing special actions to standardize enterprise-related law enforcement are crucial for optimizing the business environment and stabilizing market expectations, which will help private enterprises to develop confidently [11][12] - The special actions have already identified over 6,200 issues and recovered significant amounts for affected enterprises, indicating a proactive approach to improving regulatory practices [12][13]

Core Points - The article discusses the implementation and progress of a nationwide special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, aiming to protect their legal rights and improve the business environment [2][4][6] Group 1: Special Action Overview - The special action was launched in March this year, focusing on addressing issues such as arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and seizures [2][4] - As of May 21, the action has gathered 6,232 problem clues and urged the handling of 5,246 cases, involving a total amount of 335 million yuan, recovering losses of approximately 98.81 million yuan for enterprises [6] Group 2: Key Issues Addressed - The action targets four main issues: arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and seizures; illegal cross-regional enforcement; inconsistent enforcement standards; and abuse of power or misconduct by enforcement personnel [4][6] - These issues are widespread and have significant negative impacts, with strong feedback from enterprises [4] Group 3: Implementation and Results - The Ministry of Justice has established a working platform to streamline the collection and processing of problem clues, enhancing efficiency and reducing the burden on local authorities [5] - Initial results show a downward trend in administrative fines and effective curtailment of arbitrary inspections, although there is still a gap between outcomes and enterprise expectations [6] Group 4: Future Plans and Mechanisms - Future efforts will focus on strengthening supervision of problem rectification, addressing prominent enforcement issues, and conducting research to evaluate the effectiveness of the action [6][9] - The establishment of a long-term mechanism for standardized enforcement is emphasized to prevent issues from recurring and to foster a conducive business environment [7][9]