近年来，省司法厅持续推进健全依法行政制度机制、强化行政执法监督、加强行政复议等工作，以 群众和企业满意度为重要标尺，聚焦法治政府建设"率先突破"目标，纵深推进《陕西省关于进一步推进 法治政府建设的若干措施》落地见效，实现法治政府建设人民群众满意度连续3年提升。 陕西在全国率先出台《行政公文类型源头认定指导意见》《行政规范性文件合法性审核正负面事项 清单》，制定《全面提升行政规范性文件质量专项行动方案》，不断完善规范性文件合法性审核机制， 加强对行政规范性文件监督管理。 "政策法规，分门别类，一键查清，真是给咱省下了不少时间。"8月19日，西安市一家科创企业的 行政负责人通过陕西省政府门户网站上的陕西省政策文件省级统一公开查询平台，很快就弄清了省上的 科学技术奖励办法。 人民满意，是法治政府建设的根本导向。 2024年以来，省司法厅对279件省政府和省政府办公厅拟制发文件进行合法性审核，对13件市政府 规章、380件市政府和省级部门行政规范性文件进行备案审查，同时抓实异议审查，高度重视群众和企 业反映的问题，将其作为优化营商环境的重要抓手。省司法厅针对某市正在制定的网约车行业新规引发 的争议，精准对接企业诉求， ...

不可否认，我们在法治政府建设上取得的显著成绩，但也不能 忽视从"亮证姐"等事件中暴露出的短板缺项。依法行政、建设 法治政府仍然任重道远，还须围绕强化履职尽责、推进公开公 正、保护公民权利等方面持续发力、久久为功，让人民群众更 加满意。 作者：柳宇霆 封图：图虫创意 时隔多日，"亮证姐"事件仍在发酵。8月6日，据八桂警察阳光执法网消息，此前备受关注的防城 港"亮证姐"侯某某因违反《治安管理处罚法》被处以行政拘留五日的处罚。对当事人被依法处理， 公众普遍给予了肯定。 依法行政，为何不能守住权力底线？行使公权力，不能逾越边界，侵犯公民私权利。公开行政处罚 决定，固然是正确的，但相关内容必须符合法律规定。翻看上述决定，一方隐去姓名，另一方全名 显示，很容易让人感觉"厚此薄彼"。前期，侯某某车牌号未遮掩在网络平台公布后，"当晚陆续收 到广东、江苏、湖北、河南、安徽、湖南、陕西等地交管12123平台发送的11条违停挪车信息"， 这次无保留地公开车牌号，也有可能带来套牌使用等危险。这些细节，并不是无关紧要的小事。 如今回看这起沸沸扬扬的公共事件，恰如当地通报所言，"这件事情源于一起偶然的交通争议，本 来只是普通的民间纠纷" ...

Core Insights - The 2024 administrative trial work in Heze aims to enhance judicial efficiency and service to the public while promoting high-level rule of law [2][5] - A significant decrease in first-instance administrative cases is noted, with 1,578 cases filed in 2024, a 35.2% drop from 2,435 cases in 2023, marking the largest decline in the province [2] - The administrative cases cover 32 areas of administrative management, with a high proportion related to "administrative penalties," "administrative enforcement," "administrative confirmation," and "government information disclosure" [2] Group 1: Judicial Efficiency and Quality Improvement - The court is implementing regular data meetings and special work promotion meetings to enhance case handling efficiency [3] - A fast-track trial mechanism is being established, with dedicated teams for expedited cases and complex cases led by senior judges [3] - The integration of smart court initiatives is underway, utilizing case management platforms to modernize trial work [3] Group 2: Collaborative Governance and Dispute Resolution - The court is actively involving social forces in dispute resolution, including hiring dedicated mediators and engaging public representatives in mediation efforts [3][4] - A pre-litigation mediation center is established to review cases before they reach court, promoting early resolution [3] - A joint meeting system for administrative trials and responses is being implemented to encourage the use of administrative review channels for dispute resolution [3][4] Group 3: Strengthening Government and Judicial Cooperation - A task list for government-court collaboration has been developed to address common issues in administrative enforcement [4] - Judicial recommendations are being sent to relevant departments to prevent and resolve disputes effectively [4] - Legal education initiatives are being conducted for government officials to enhance their understanding of the law and improve administrative practices [4]

Group 1 - The meeting emphasized the importance of advancing the rule of law in government as a key task for comprehensive governance under the rule of law, aligning with Xi Jinping's thoughts on the rule of law [1][2] - The city aims to enhance legal awareness, strengthen legal thinking, and improve legal capabilities to support high-quality development and efficient governance [1] - The meeting reported on the 2024 progress of rule of law initiatives, with various departments sharing their experiences [1] Group 2 - The government is encouraged to actively promote high-quality legislative processes and explore new legislative needs in emerging fields [2] - There is a focus on improving the quality of administrative law enforcement, ensuring it is standardized, fair, and civil, while also enhancing service-oriented law enforcement [2] - The establishment of a comprehensive administrative decision-making system is prioritized, including the refinement of major decision-making procedures and post-decision evaluations [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is the issuance of the "2025 Major Administrative Decision Project Catalog" by the Sichuan Provincial Government, which includes 21 significant decision-making items aimed at enhancing scientific, democratic, and lawful decision-making mechanisms [1][2] - The catalog covers various areas such as technological innovation, credit enhancement for small and micro enterprises, environmental impact assessments, employment support policies, public data resource management, social security card integration, and the establishment of a national digital economy innovation development pilot zone [1] - The implementation of the catalog is part of a broader initiative to accelerate the construction of a law-based government, with a structured process involving expert evaluations and public consultations [1][2] Group 2 - The provincial government has set clear requirements for the organization and implementation of the catalog, emphasizing the need to adhere to legal procedures for decision-making, including public participation and expert reviews [2] - There is a focus on dynamic management, allowing for adjustments or additions to decision items as necessary, which must be proposed by the responsible units and processed according to established procedures [2] - The government also highlights the importance of proper documentation and archiving of decision-making records to ensure comprehensive tracking of the entire decision-making process [2]

Group 1 - The core objective of the special action is to promote standardized law enforcement related to enterprises, addressing difficulties faced by businesses, and creating a conducive development environment [1][3] - The inspection team held a meeting to discuss the progress and challenges of the special action, emphasizing the importance of administrative law enforcement in shaping government image and public trust [3][8] - Various enforcement departments reported on their responsibilities and exchanged views on the challenges faced during law enforcement processes [3][6] Group 2 - The inspection team visited several companies to gather feedback from business leaders regarding law enforcement practices and to discuss standardization [5][6] - The team acknowledged the efforts made by the county government in implementing the special action and outlined requirements for further improvement, including enhancing law enforcement efficiency and optimizing service for businesses [8] - Emphasis was placed on adhering to local jurisdiction principles, establishing collaboration mechanisms, and prohibiting any form of coercive enforcement or profit-seeking behavior by law enforcement officials [8]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary education in law, highlighting how exposure to various subjects broadens understanding of legal principles [1] - The author discusses the significance of administrative law in national governance and expresses a strong interest in the field, influenced by passionate educators [1][2] - The article outlines the author's academic journey, including the transition from undergraduate studies to becoming the first doctoral student in administrative litigation law in New China [2] Group 2 - The author reflects on the relationship between academic research and practical application, noting that high-quality research is often driven by personal interest and societal needs [3][6] - The article mentions the establishment of the Administrative Legislative Research Group by the National People's Congress, where the author contributed to legislative efforts, including the drafting of the Compensation Law [3][4] - The author highlights the importance of engaging with legal practice through typical cases to understand the legal system's operation and to identify systemic issues [5] Group 3 - The article discusses the establishment of the Rule of Law Government Research Institute at China University of Political Science and Law, focusing on the development of projects that assess and promote the construction of a rule of law government [6][7] - The author emphasizes the need for legal research to be rooted in local culture and responsive to contemporary issues, aiming to contribute to the construction of an independent legal knowledge system in China [7][8] - The article concludes with a call for high-quality research that addresses China's unique challenges and contributes to the broader goal of socialist modernization [7]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is that Hangzhou has implemented a special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, resulting in significant reductions in administrative penalties and inspections [1][2] - Since the launch of the special action, administrative penalty cases related to enterprises have decreased by 33.37%, and the amount of fines has dropped by 21.44% [1] - The number of on-site inspections related to enterprises has seen a dramatic decline of 62.83% [1] Group 2 - The special action focuses on reducing redundant and inefficient inspections, with administrative checks on enterprises decreasing by 29.43% in 2024 compared to the previous year, and a further decline of 62.83% since 2025 [2] - To address enterprises' needs for compliance rather than punishment, Hangzhou has established a legal risk prevention system for key industries, shifting enforcement from "post-correction" to "source prevention" [2] - The city has published 40 key industry legal risk management guidelines and conducted over 80 special activities, serving more than 800 enterprises [2] Group 3 - Hangzhou has expanded its "first violation not punished" and "minor violations exempt from punishment" lists to cover 37 items across 21 enforcement areas [2] - By the end of 2024, the total number of exempted or lightly punished cases reached 144,100, resulting in a fine reduction of over 639 million yuan for market entities and the public [2] - The city aims to continue its efforts to optimize the business environment and contribute to the national legal business environment improvement [3]

Group 1 - The meeting of the municipal standing committee focused on various reports from the municipal government regarding the management of medical insurance funds, the implementation of laws related to small and medium enterprises, traditional Chinese medicine, property management in residential communities, and the management of state-owned assets for 2024 [2][3] - The standing committee reviewed and discussed the draft regulations on land compensation and resettlement, which were later approved pending review by the provincial standing committee [3] - Personnel appointments were made during the meeting, with new appointees taking an oath of office [4]

石景山分局作为统筹石景山区规划自然资源事务的基层政府部门，以"接诉即办"改革为契机，着力 强化法治思维和法治能力；以解决市民诉求为出发点，分局内上下协同，政府职能部门间通力合作，着 力解决在规划自然资源中遇到的基层治理难点问题，形成了以接诉即办为核心的"三维"工作体系；通过 构建"制度+热线"体系，夯实法治保障，完善配套文件，建立多元会商机制；通过构建"督办+热线"体 系，健全诉求化解机制，形成"督回应、督质效、督作风"工作方法；通过构建"治理+热线"体系，提升 服务水平，纵向上形成"工单办理—需求提炼—政策完善—预防化解"闭合回路，横向上形成"工单办理 —公众评价—整改提升"闭合回路。 石景山分局相关负责人表示，法治建设没有终点站，全局将以此次获奖为新起点，持续推动法治政 府建设，让改革红利更好惠及群众，为石景山区高质量发展做出更多贡献。 日前，第七届"法治政府奖"终评揭晓。北京市规划和自然资源委员会石景山分局申报的项目"以接 诉即办为抓手，深入推进基层治理法治化——北京市规划和自然资源委员会石景山分局法治政府建设新 实践"荣获"法治政府奖"。 "法治政府奖"是由中国政法大学法治政府研究院发起设立，对各级国 ...