Core Viewpoint - The parking issue at Dongguan's Sena City Garden reflects a complex interaction between developers, government agencies, and residents, highlighting the gap between legality and rationality in urban governance [1][2]. Group 1: Legal and Regulatory Aspects - The Dongguan Municipal Bureau of Industry and Information Technology (工信局) has the legal right to lease parking spaces, as supported by the Civil Code and the Guangdong Property Management Regulations [1]. - However, the principle of "owner priority" was overlooked in this case, raising concerns about procedural justice and the credibility of the legal framework [1]. Group 2: Political and Ethical Considerations - The political nature of the Bureau's actions is significant; while legally justified, the presence of government vehicles in exclusive parking spaces during peak hours contrasts with the public service ethos [2]. - The Bureau should prioritize higher ethical standards than commercial entities, especially during times of public need [2]. Group 3: Proposed Solutions and Community Engagement - A preliminary plan suggests sharing 50-70 parking spaces with residents to alleviate parking difficulties caused by municipal construction [3]. - There is a need for better communication between government departments and local communities to prevent reliance on media exposure for information dissemination [3].

Core Viewpoint - The administrative order from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in April 2025 has plunged over 4,700 international students into an identity crisis, highlighting the arbitrary nature of policy enforcement and judicial processes in U.S. immigration history [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - In March 2025, the Trump administration initiated a "criminal screening" operation targeting international students, resulting in the termination of SEVIS records for over 4,700 students since January 20, 2025, leading to loss of legal status and visa revocation [2][3]. - Many students were caught off guard, with some unaware of their SEVIS termination until notified by their schools, creating widespread panic within the international student community [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Response and Developments - In response to perceived injustices, international students began filing lawsuits against the Trump administration, with many judges siding with the students on grounds of "procedural injustice" [4]. - On April 25, 2025, the Trump administration temporarily restored the SEVIS records of some students, indicating a shift in policy following legal pressures, although concerns about ongoing risks remained [4][5]. Group 3: Ongoing Concerns and Future Implications - Despite some students regaining legal status, uncertainty persists as the government retains the authority to terminate SEVIS records for various reasons, leaving many students cautious and anxious [5][6]. - The incident has prompted some students to consider accelerating their graduation or transferring to institutions in other countries due to fears of further policy changes [6][8]. Group 4: Broader Context and Reactions - The incident reflects deeper issues within U.S. immigration policy under the Trump administration, which has focused on strict measures against both illegal and legal immigrants, impacting the academic environment [6][7]. - Prominent universities, including Harvard, have publicly opposed the government's actions, emphasizing the need to protect academic independence and constitutional rights [7][8].